Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2018
The Sixth International Congress “Water, Waste and Environment” (EDE6-2017)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Waste Management and Environment
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. H. W. Koyro, M. A. Khan and H. Lieth (2011): Halophytic crops: a resource for the future to reduce the water crisis?. Em J Food Agric. 23: 1-16 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Gallardo, A. Zieritz, D. C. Aldridge (2015): The importance of the human footprint in shaping the global distribution of terrestrial, freshwater and marine invaders. PloS one. 10: 1-17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. H. Schlesinger, M. C. Dietze, R. B. Jackson, R. P. Phillips, C. C. Rhoades, L. E. Rustad, J. M. Vose (2015): Forest biogeochemistry in response to drought. Glob Change Biol. 22: 2318-2328 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Abideen, H.W. Koyro, B. Huchzermeyer, B. Gul AND M.A. Khan (2017): Impact of a Biochar or a Compost-Biochar Mixture on Water relation, Nutrient uptake and Photosynthesis of Phragmites karka. Pedosphere. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60362-X [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Von Glisczynski, A. Sandhage-Hofmanna, W. Amelunga, R. Pude (2016): Biochar-compost substrates do not promote growth and fruit quality of a replanted German apple orchard with fertile Haplic Luvicsol soils. Scientia Horticulturae 213: 110-114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Sorrenti, M. Toselli (2016): Soil leaching as affected by the amendment with biochar and compost. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 226: 56–64 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. ForjáN, A. RodríGuez-Vila, B. Cerqueira, E.F. Covelo (2017): Comparison of the effects of compost versus compost and biochar on the recovery of a mine soil by improving the nutrient content. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 183: 46-57 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Suliman, J.B. Harsh, N.I. Abu-Lail, A.M. Fortuna, I. Dallmeyer AND M. Garcia-PéRez (2017): The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci. Total Environ. 574: 139-147 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Liu, H. Schulz, S. Brandl, H. Miehtke, B. Huwe AND B. Glaser (2012): Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a Dystric Cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 175: 698-707 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ventura, G. Sorrenti, P. Panzacchi, E. George AND G. Tonon (2013) : Biochar reduces short-term nitrate leaching from a horizon in an apple orchard. J. Environ. Qual. 42: 76-82 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. S.E Hale, J. Lehmann, D. Rutherford, A.R. Zimmerman, R.T. Bachmann, V. Shitumbanuma, A. O’TOOLE, K.L. Sundqvist, H.P.H. Arp AND G. Cornelissen, G. (2012): Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 :2830-2838 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Oleszczuk, I. Jo_Sko AND M. Ku_Smierz (2013): Biochar properties regarding to contaminants content and ecotoxicological assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 260: 375-382 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. W. Buss AND O. Masek (2014): Mobile organic compounds in biochar : A potential source of contamination-Phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidium sativum) germination. Journal of Environmental Management 137: 111-119 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. KołTowski AND P. Oleszczuk (2015): Toxicity of biochars after polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal by thermal treatment. Ecological Engineering 75: 79-85 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Domene, A. Enders, K. Hanley, J. Lehmann (2015): Ecotoxicological characterization of biochars: Role of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Science of the Total Environment 512–513: 552-561 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Busch, C. Kammann, L. GrüNhage AND CHRISTOPH MÜLLER (2012): Simple Biotoxicity Tests for Evaluation of Carbonaceous Soil Additives: Establishment and Reproducibility of Four Test Procedures. Journal of Environmental Quality 41:1023-1032 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Smider and B. Singh (2014): Agronomic performance of a high ash biochar in two contrasting soils,” Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 191: 99-107 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Sun, B. Gao, Y. Yao, J. Fang, M. Zhang, Y. Zhou, H. Chen, L. Yang (2014): Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties,” Chemical Engineering Journal 240: 574-578 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Nansubuga, N. Banadda, F. Ronsse, W. Verstraete, K. Rabaey (2015): Digestion of high rate activated sludge coupled to biochar formation for soil improvement in the tropics, ” Water Research 81: 216-222 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. K.Y. Chan, L. Van Zwieten, I. Meszaros, A. Downie, S. Joseph (2008): Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments,” Australian Journal of Soil Research 46: 437-444 [Google Scholar]
  21. G.C. Sigua, J.M. Novak, D.W. Watts, M.G. Johnson, K. Spokas (2016): Efficacies of designer biochars in improving biomass and nutrient uptake of winter wheat grown in a hard setting subsoil layer,” Chemosphere 142: 176-183 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. I.M Lima AND W.E. Marshall (2005): Granular activated carbons from broiler manure: physical, chemical and adsorptive properties. Biores. Techno 96: 699-706 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ü. Uras, M. Carrier, A. G. Hardie, J. H. Knoetze (2012): Physico-chemical characterization of biochars from vacuum pyrolysis of South African agricultural wastes for application as soil amendments. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 98: 207-213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Abel, A. Peters, S. Trinks, H. Schonsky, M. Facklam, G. Wessolek (2013): Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202:183-191 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.