Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018
River Flow 2018 - Ninth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 10
Section Hydraulic structures and their effects on bed, flow regime and ecology
Published online 05 September 2018
  1. C.R. Neill, River bed Scour, a review for bridge engineers. Contract No. 281, Res.Council of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (1964). [Google Scholar]
  2. D.C. Froehlich, Analysis of Onsite Measurements of Scour at Piers. Proc., A.S.C.E.,National Hydraulic Engineering Conference, Colorado Springs, CO (1991). [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Federico, G. Silvagni, F. Volpi, Scour vulnerability of river bridge piers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(10). pp. 890-899 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Z. Lee, C. C. Huang, Y. J. Liao, W. Y. Chang, H. K. Chang, Y. C. Tan, Deviation of local scour and contraction scour near bridge with various scour formulas around bridgepiers, Sixth World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, 6WCSCM,Barcelona, Spain (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. F.Z Lee, T.H. Huang, J.S. Lai, Y.B. Lin, K.C. Chang, Using 2-D Numerical ModelSimulation on Bridge Scouring, Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 65-78 (2017). (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  6. H.W. Shen, V.R. Schneider, S.S. Karaki, Mechanism of local Scour. Engineering Research Center, Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, Colorado CER 66HWS22 (1966). [Google Scholar]
  7. J.H. Hong, W.D. Guo, H.W. Wang, F.Z. Lee, Y.B. Lin, Field measurement andsimulation of riverbed and bridge scour in Cho-Shui River in Taiwan. Sixth WorldConference on Structural Control and Monitoring, 6WCSCM, Barcelona, Spain (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. J.L. Briaud, F. Ting, H.C. Chen, R. Gudavalli, S. Perugu, G. Wei, SRICOS: predictionof scour rate in cohesive soils at bridge piers. Journal of Geotechnical andGeoenvironmental Engineering, 125(4), pp. 237-246 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.S. Lai, Applications of flood disaster monitoring and early warning technology in ariver basin, Project No. MOST 106-3011-F-002-003 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Hamill, Bridge hydraulics. London: E& FN Spon (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L.J. Prendergast, K. Gavin, A review of bridge scour monitoring techniques. Journal ofRock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 6(2), pp. 138-149 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L.S. Hsieh, R.Y. Wang, A Semi-Distributed Parallel-Type Linear Reservoir Rainfall-Runoff Model and Its Application in Taiwan. Journal of Hydrological Processes, 13(8), pp.1247-1268 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Fisher, M.N. Chowdhury, A.A. Khan, S. Atamturktur, An evaluation of scourmeasurement devices. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 33(5), pp. 55-67 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Heidarpour, H. Afzalimehr, E. Izadinia, Reduction of local scour around bridge piergroups using collars. International Journal of Sediment Research, 25(4), pp. 411-422(2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.C. Forde, D.M. McCann, M.R. Clark, K.J. Broughton, P.J. Fenning, A. Brown, Radarmeasurement of bridge scour. NDT&E International, 32(8), pp. 481-492 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Flushing test and hydraulic measurement of bridge piers, National Taiwan University (2012). (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  17. S.C. Inglis, Maximum depth of scour at heads of guide bands and groynes, pier noses, and downstream bridges-the behavior and control of rivers and canals. Indian Waterways Experimental Station, Poona, India (1949). [Google Scholar]
  18. S.C. Jain, E.E. Fischer, Scour around Bridge Piers at High Velocity. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 106(11), pp. 1827-1842 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  19. SRH-1D, User's Manual, version 2.2, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. V.H. Jianchun, G. Blair, User's Manual for SRH-1D V2.1 (2007). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.