Implementing Web 2.0 Technologies in Mining Engineers Language Communications

Alena Perevalova

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20184104030

All issues

Volume 41 (2018)

E3S Web Conf., 41 (2018) 04030

References

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 41, 2018 III^rd International Innovative Mining Symposium


Article Number		04030
Number of page(s)		6
Section		Mining Regions’ Sustainable Development
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104030
Published online		26 June 2018

M.A. Chatti, D. Dahl, M. Jarke, WEBIST 2008, 4th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 1, 370-375 (2008) [Google Scholar]
T. Orehovački, M. Konnecki, D. Radošević, 31st MIPRO International Convention on Computers in Education, 1, 269-273 (2008) [Google Scholar]
A. Darwish, K. I. Lakhtaria, Jour. Of Adv. In Inf. Tech., 2:4 (2011) [Google Scholar]
P. Gautam, Schol. Res. Jour. Hum. Scien. Eng. Lang, 1:3 (2014) [Google Scholar]
S. J. Cold, ACM SIGITE Newsletter, 3:1, 6–9 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
B. Kieslinger, F. Wild, O. Arsun, 1 st European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 640-645 (2006) [Google Scholar]
D. Munca, Web 2.0 as Cognitive Tools in Teaching a Foreign Language (LAP, Los Angeles, 2010) [Google Scholar]
K. Placing, M-H Ward, M. Pead, P. T. Teixeira, UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings, 2, 159-164 (2005) [Google Scholar]
W. G Stock, Inf. Serv. Use, 27:3, 97-103 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
J. P. Shim, J. Shropshire, S. Park, H. Harris, N. Campbell, Ind. Man. & Data Syst., 107:4, 587 – 600 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. Tyagi, IJEDICT, 8:2, 28-43 (2012) [Google Scholar]
L. Lee, ReCALL, 22:2, 212-227 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
L. Lee, Lang. Learn. & Tech, 15:3, 87-109 (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] M.A. Chatti, D. Dahl, M. Jarke, WEBIST 2008, 4th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 1, 370-375 (2008) [Google Scholar]

[2] T. Orehovački, M. Konnecki, D. Radošević, 31st MIPRO International Convention on Computers in Education, 1, 269-273 (2008) [Google Scholar]

[3] A. Darwish, K. I. Lakhtaria, Jour. Of Adv. In Inf. Tech., 2:4 (2011) [Google Scholar]

[4] P. Gautam, Schol. Res. Jour. Hum. Scien. Eng. Lang, 1:3 (2014) [Google Scholar]

[5] S. J. Cold, ACM SIGITE Newsletter, 3:1, 6–9 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[6] B. Kieslinger, F. Wild, O. Arsun, 1 st European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 640-645 (2006) [Google Scholar]

[7] D. Munca, Web 2.0 as Cognitive Tools in Teaching a Foreign Language (LAP, Los Angeles, 2010) [Google Scholar]

[8] K. Placing, M-H Ward, M. Pead, P. T. Teixeira, UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings, 2, 159-164 (2005) [Google Scholar]

[9] W. G Stock, Inf. Serv. Use, 27:3, 97-103 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[10] J. P. Shim, J. Shropshire, S. Park, H. Harris, N. Campbell, Ind. Man. & Data Syst., 107:4, 587 – 600 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[11] S. Tyagi, IJEDICT, 8:2, 28-43 (2012) [Google Scholar]

[12] L. Lee, ReCALL, 22:2, 212-227 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[13] L. Lee, Lang. Learn. & Tech, 15:3, 87-109 (2011) [Google Scholar]