Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 73, 2018
The 3rd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2018)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 6
Section Energy Planning, Policy, and Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187301013
Published online 21 December 2018
  1. Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M., Fonoll, X., Peces, M., Astals, S., A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 36, 412–427 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. LiR., ChenS. and LiX., Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production. Energy Sources. 31: 1848–1856 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. IbnAbubakar, BabaShehu Umar & NasirIsmail, and, Anaerobic digestion of cow dung for biogas production. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 7 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. ContrerasVelázquez, Luz & Schelle, H & Sebrango, Carlos & PeredaReyes, Ileana, Methane potential and biodegradability of rice straw, rice husk and rice residues from the drying process. Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. 65. 1142–9. 10.2166/wst.2012.951(2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. MohammadSayyadi, MangiboA. Ibifuro, IyagbaT. Elijah, Study of Cow Dung as Co-Substrate with Rice Husk in Biogas Production : Scientific Research and Essay Vol. 4 9, pp. 861-866. ISSN 1992-2248 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  6. PillaierP, “RICE: Post Production Manual”, Wiley Eastern yLimited New Delhi, India (1988) [Google Scholar]
  7. EzekoyeVA, OkekeCE, Design, construction and performance evaluation of plastic bio-digester and the storage of biogas. The Pacific J. Sci. Technol. 7: 176–184 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. MackieRI, BryantMPAnaerobic digestion of cattle waste at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Appl. Mocrobiol.Biotechnol. 43: 346–350 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. IloriMO, AdebusoyeA, LawalAK, AwotiwonOA (2007). Production of biogas from banana and plantain peels. Adv. Environ. Biol. 1: 33–38 [Google Scholar]
  10. Okeh, C., Onwosi, C. O., & Fredrick, J. O. C., Renewable Energy, 62, 204—208. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.006 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. YiJ, DongB, JinJ, DaiX, Effect of Increasing Total Solids Contents on Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste under Mesophilic Conditions: Performance and Microbial Characteristics Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(7): e102548. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102548 (2014) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PavanP, BattistoniP, Mata-AlvarezJ., Performance of thermophilic semidry anaerobic digestion process changing the feed biodegradability.Water SciTechnol. 41: 75–81 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. Abbassi-GuendouzA, BrockmannD, TrablyE, DumasC, Delgene`sJP, et al, Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation.Bioresour Technol. 111: 55–61 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Forster-CarneiroT, Pe´rezM, RomeroL, Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresour Technol. 99: 6994–7002 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. VicentaM, PachecoG, AlamisMLA, AngloPG, TanBV, SilverioCM, A study of some factors affecting biogas production from pineapple peelings. In: BidinR, ChongCN, WangCW (Eds.).Proceedings of the second ASEAN Workshop on biogas production applied to the management and utilization of food waste materials. Kaula Terengganu, Malaysia. Pp. 189–202 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  16. MelamaneXolisa, TandlichRoman, Anaerobic Digestion of Fungally pre-treated distillery wastewater. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 6(17), pp. 1990-1993 (2016).. [Google Scholar]
  17. AlexanderM, Introduction to Microbiology, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, India (1977) [Google Scholar]
  18. Mackie. RI, BryantMP, Anaerobic digestion of cattle waste at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43: 346—350 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. ZhangR, ZhangZ, Bio-gasification of rice straw with an anaerobic-phased solids digester system. Bioresour. Technol. 68:235–245 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  20. UzodinmaEO, OfoefuleAU, EzeJI, OnwukaND, Biogas production from blends of agro-industrial wastes. Trends in Appl. Sci. Res. 26 : 554—558 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  21. UzodimaEO, OfoefuleAU, EzeJI, Mbaeyi, I, OnwukaND, Effect of some organic wastes on the biogas yield from carbonated soft drink sludge. Sci. Res. Essay, 3(9): 401–405 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  22. KivaisiAK, Pretreatment of Robusta coffee hulls and codigestion with cow dung for enhanced anaerobic digestion. Tanz. J. Sci. 28:1–10 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  23. NagamaniB, RamasamyK, “Biogas Production Technology: An Indian Perspective Fermentation Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, India (2007) [Google Scholar]
  24. Bronzeoak, Rice Husk Ash Market Study. DTI, London (2003) [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar, P.Senthil, Ramakrishnan, K., Kirupha, S.Dinesh, Sivanesa, S, Thermodynamic and Kinetic Studies of Cadmium Adsorption from Aqueous Solution Onto Rice Husk (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kesuma, WahyuPuja,. Pengembangan Teknologi Alat Produksi Gas Metana dari Pembakaran Sampah Organik dengan Pemurnian Gas menggunakan Zeolite pada Variasi Jumlah Tabung. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. Armesto, L., Bahillo, A., Veijonen, K.Cabanillas, A., and Otero, J, Combustion Behaviourof Rice Husk in a Bubbling Fluidised Bed.Biomass and Bioenergy. 23:171–179 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. AdeyanjuAA, Effect o0f seeding of wood-ash on biogas production using pig waste and cassava peels. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 3: 242–245 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  29. BabelS, Sae-TangJ, PecharaplyA, Anaerobic co-digestion of Iyagba et al. 865 sewage and brewery sludge for biogas production and land application. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 6: 131–140 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cuzin, N.et al., Methanogenic fermentation of cassava peel using a pilot plug flow digester, Bioresource Technology. 41: 259–264 (1992). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.