EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 85 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 85 (2019) 07001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 85, 2019
EENVIRO 2018 – Sustainable Solutions for Energy and Environment
Article Number 07001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198507001
Published online 22 February 2019
  1. ***, USDA-NRCS-United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Part 630 Hydrology, National Engineering Handbook, Ch. 17 Flood Routing (2014) https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/wntsc/H&H/NEHhydrology/ch17.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Fiorentini, S. Orlandini, Adv. Water Resour., 59, 123 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres. 2013.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  3. X. Li, B.D. Wang, R. Shi, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(2), 197 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:2(197) [Google Scholar]
  4. D.L. Fread, K.S. Hsy, Applicability of two simplified flood routing methods: level-pool and Muskingum-Cunge, in: Shen H.W., Su S.T., Wen F., ASCE National Hydraulic Engineering Conference, CA: ASCE, (1993) http://cedb.asce.org/CEDB search/record.jsp?dockey=0084080 [Google Scholar]
  5. B.A. Dendrou, E.N. Houstis, T.S. Papatheodorou, S.A. Dendrou, Department of Computer Science Technical Reports, Purdue e-Pubs, Report no. 78-279 (1978) https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.ro/&httpsredir=1&article=1209&context=cstech [Google Scholar]
  6. J.D. Fenton, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 37(3), 233 (2010) http://johndfenton.com/Papers/Fenton92-Reservoir-routing.pdf [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Haktanir, H. Ozmen, Comparison of hydraulic and hydrologic routing on three long reservoirs, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 123(2), 153 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123 :2(153) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V.T. Chow, D.R. Maidment, L.W. Mays, Applied Hydrology, second ed. (Mc-Graw Hill Inc., Europe 2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. L.G. Puls, Flood Regulation of Tennesse River, In Proceedings of the 70th Congress, 1st Session, House Document No. 185, Part 2, Appendix B, US Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1928) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Strelkoff, USACE, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Research Documents RD-23 (1980) http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/publications/ResearchDocuments/RD-23.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. R.D. Goodrich, Civil Eng., 1, 417 (1931) [Google Scholar]
  12. ***, USACE-United States Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering and Design, Flood Runoff Analysis, Manual No. 1110-2-1417 (1994) https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/em_1110-2-1417.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. ***, USACE-United States Army Corps of Engineers, HEC-RAS, Hydrologic Engineering Centre- River Analysis System, Version 5.05 (2018) http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/ [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Goodell, B. Walhin, Dynamic and Level Pool Reservoir drawdown-a Practical Comparison for Dam Breach modeling, 33rd IAHR Congress Proceedings, Vancouver (2009) [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Cocoş, Water management in Bucharest City, in Romanian (Ars Docendi, Bucureşti, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. D.M. Cojoc, Hydrologic analysis of Dâmboviţa river in the context of regulated regime, in Romanian, (Terra Nostra, Iaşi, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. D.E. Gogoaşe Nistoran, A. Dragomirescu, C.S. Ionescu, M. Schiaua, N. Vasiliu, M. Georgescu, A Procedure to Develop Area- Storage Capacity Curves of Reservoirs from Depth Sounding Surveys, IEEE Conf. Publications, 2017 Int. Conf. on Energy and Environment CIEM, (2017) https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8120761 [Google Scholar]
  18. D.E. Gogoaşe Nistoran, D. A. Gheorghe Popovici, B. A. Craia Savin, I. Armaş, GIS for dam-break flooding. Study area: Bicaz-Izvorul Muntelui (Romania), in: M. Bostenaru M., C. Crăciun, Space and time visualizations, Springer, 253 (2016) https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-24942-1_15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P.B. Bedient, W.C. Huber, B.E. Vieux, Hydrology and floodplain analysis, 6th edition (Pearson, 2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.