EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 89 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 89 (2019) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 89, 2019
The 2018 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2018)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Wettability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198903002
Published online 29 March 2019
  1. C. McPhee, J. Reed and I. Zubizarreta, “Core Analysis: A Best Practice Guide”. Petroleum Development in Science, 64Series Editor J. Cubbit Elsevier 1st edition, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson G. A. “Wettability Literature Survey- Part 1: Rock/Oil/Bine Interactions and the Effects of Core handling on Wettability”. SPE13932-PA 1986. [Google Scholar]
  3. G.A. Anderson, “Wettability Literature Survey Part 3: The effects of wettability on the electrical properties of porous media”. J. Pet. Technol, 38(12), 1371–1379 (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G.A. Anderson, “Wettability Literature Survey Part 4: The Effects of wettability on capillary pressure”. J. Pet Technol., 39(10), 1183–1300 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  5. G.A. Anderson, “Wettability Literature Survey Part 5: The Effects of wettability on relative permeability”. J. Pet Technol., 39(11), 1183–1300 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  6. G.R. Jerauld and J.J. Rathmell, “Wettability and relative permeability of Prudhoe Bay: a case study in mixed-wet reservoirs” In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Evaluation of Reservoir Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery;Laramie, Wyoming. (1994). [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Lebedeva, A. Fodgen and T. SendenKnackstedt M. “Kaolinite Wettability – The Effect of Salinity, pH and Calcium” # 11 in SCA(2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. J.L. Bantignies, C.C. Dit Moulin and H. Dexpert, “Wettability contrasts in kaolinite and illite clays: characterization by infrared and X-ray absorption spectroscopies.. Clay. Clay Miner., 45(2), 184–193 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Fjelde, A.V. Omekeh and P.E. Haugen, “Effect of Ferrous Ion Fe+2 on Wettability: Oxidation and Cation Bridging”. SPE -185816-MS, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. R.F. Kleinschmidt and P.B. Lorenz, “North Burbank Unit tertiary recovery pilot Test”., BERC/TPR-76/ 2 Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville Oklahoma US (1976). [Google Scholar]
  11. J.C. Trantham and R.L. Clampitt, “Determination of Oil Saturation After Waterflooding in an Oil-Wet Reservoir – The North Burbank Unit, Tract 97 project”. SPE 5802, (1977). [Google Scholar]
  12. E.C. Donanldson, R.D. Thomas and P.B. Lorenz, “Wettability determination and its effect on recovery efficiency”. SPEJ, 9, 13–20 (1969). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Fjelde, A.V. Omekeh and M.W. Minde, “Removal of Mud Components from Reservoir Sandstone Rocks”. #16 in SCA, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. W.H. Thomas, J.K. Ringen and S.O. Rash, “Effect of Glauconite on petrophysical properties as revealed by core analysis”. #32 in SCA, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  15. G.W. Brindley and R.F. Youell, “Ferrous chamosite and ferric chamosite”. The Mineralogical Society, 30, 57–70 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  16. Morrow, N. R., H. T. Lim, J. S. Ward, “Effect of Crude-Oil-Induced Wettability Changes on Oil Recovery”, SPE-13215-IPA 1986. [Google Scholar]
  17. G.Q. Zhang, C.C. Huang and G.J. Hirasaki, “Interpretation of Wettability in Sandstones with NMR Analysis” #9921. in SCA, (1999). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.