Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 89, 2019
The 2018 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2018)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Displacement Mechanisms / EOR
Published online 29 March 2019
  1. K.S. Sorbie, Polymer-Improved Oil Recovery, 359p., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1991). [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Bondino, R. Nguyen, G. Hamon, P.A. Ormehaug, A. Skauge and S. Jouenne, “Tertiary Polymer Flooding in Extra-Heavy Oil: an Investigation Using 1D and 2D Experiments, Core Scale Simulation and Pore-Scale Network Models”, International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Austin, Texas (2011), , 12p. [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Unsal, A.B.G.M. ten Berge and D.A.Z. Wever, “Low salinity polymer flooding: Lower polymer retention and improved injectivity”. J Pet Sci Eng, 163, 671–682 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.069. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Dawson and R.B. Lantz, “Inaccessible Pore Volume in Polymer Flooding”. Soc Pet Eng J, 12, 448–452 (1972). doi:10.2118/3522-PA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J.C. Moore, “Gel permeation chromatography. I. A new method for molecular weight distribution of high polymers”. J Polym Sci Part A Gen Pap, 2, 835–843 (1964). doi:10.1002/pol.1964.100020220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K.S. Sorbie, “Depleted Layer Effects in Polymer Flow through Porous Media”. J Colloid Interface Sci, 139, 299–314 (1990). doi:10.1016/0021-9797(90)90103-U. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Omari, M. Moan and G. Chauveteau, “Wall effects in the flow of flexible polymer solutions through small pores”. Rheol Acta, 28, 520–526 (1989). doi:10.1007/BF01332923. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Stavland, H. Jonsbraten, A. Lohne, A. Moen and N.H. Giske, “Polymer Flooding - Flow Properties in Porous Media versus Rheological Parameters”, SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain (2010), pp 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Chauveteau and A. Zaitoun, “Basic Rheological Behavior of Xanthan Polysaccharide Solutions in Porous Media: Effects of Pore Size and Polymer Concentration”. Proceedings to the European symposium on EOR, pp 197–212 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  10. API, “Recommended Practices for Evaluation of Polymers Used in Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations”, 74p (1990). [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Wan and R.S. Seright, Is Polymer Retention Different Under Anaerobic vs. Aerobic Conditions? SPE J, 22, 431–437 (2017). doi:10.2118/179538-PA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. O.R. Cardoso and R.C. Balaban, Comparative study between Botucatu and Berea sandstone properties. J South Am Earth Sci, 62, 58–69 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2015.04.004. [Google Scholar]
  13. C.R. Appoloni, C.P. Fernandes and C.R.O. Rodrigues, “X-ray microtomography study of a sandstone reservoir rock”. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip, 580, 629–632 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. V.H.S. Ferreira and R.B.Z.L. Moreno, “Polyacrylamide Mechanical Degradation and Stability in the Presence of Iron”. OTC Brasil, Rio de Janeiro Brazil, (2017), 15p. doi:10.4043/27953-MS. [Google Scholar]
  15. B.M.O. Silveira, L.F. Lopes and R.B.Z.L. Moreno, “Polymer Flooding in a High Salinity Heavy-Oil Reservoir”. Brazilian J Pet Gas, 12, 35–51 (2018). doi:10.5419/bjpg2018-0004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M.S. Kamal, A.S. Sultan, U.A. Al-Mubaiyedh and I.A. Hussein, “Review on Polymer Flooding: Rheology, Adsorption, Stability, and Field Applications of Various Polymer Systems”. Polym Rev, 55, 491–530 (2015). doi:10.1080/15583724.2014.982821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. B.M.O. Silveira, L.F. Lopes and R.B.Z.L. Moreno, “Rheological Approach of HPAM Solutions under Harsh Conditions for EOR Applications”. Int J Eng Technol IJET-IJENS, 16, 1–8 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. E.C.M. Vermolen, M.J.T. van Haasterecht, S.K. Masalmeh, “Systematic Study of the Polymer Visco-Elastic Effect on Residual Oil Saturation by Core Flooding”, SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, (2014). 14p. doi:10.2118/169681-MS. [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Unsal, S. Oedai, M. Buijse, K. Humphry and M. van der Lee, “In situ Viscosity Measurements of Microemulsions in Cores with Different Permeabilities”, 18th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Dresden, Germany (2015). 15p. doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201412136. [Google Scholar]
  20. W.J. Cannella, C. Huh and R.S. Seright, “Prediction of Xanthan Rheology in Porous Media”, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas (1988). 16p. doi:10.2118/18089-MS. [Google Scholar]
  21. V.H.S. Ferreira and R.B.Z.L. Moreno, “Impact of flow rate variation in dynamic properties of a terpolymer in sandstone”. J Pet Sci Eng, 157, 737–746 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.071. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.