Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 92, 2019
7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Laboratory Experimental Techniques: Element Scale
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199202005
Published online 25 June 2019
  1. R. F. Craig, Craig’s soil mechanics (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. K. Mitchell & K. Soga, Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, Third Edit (John Wiley & Sons, INC, 2005). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000040003x. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. U. Susha Lekshmi, D. N. Singh, & M. Shojaei Baghini, A critical review of soil moisture measurement. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 54 (2014) 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. W. Sarsby, Environmental Geotechnics (Thomas Telford London, 2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Tarantino, A. M. Ridley, & D. G. Toll, Field measurement of suction, water content, and water permeability. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 26 (2008) 751-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9205-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. C. Topp, J. L. Davis, & A. P. Annan, Eletromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resourses Res., 16 (1980) 574-582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Ledieu, P. De Ridder, P. De Clerck, & S. Dautrebande, A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry. Journal of Hydrology, 88 (1986) 319-328. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Persson, R. Berndtsson, S. Nasri, J. Albergel, P. Zante, & Y. Yumegaki, Solute transport and water content measurements in clay soils using time domain reflectometry. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 45 (2000) 833-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660009492387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Cosenza & A. Tabbagh, Electromagnetic determination of clay water content: Role of the microporosity. Applied Clay Science, 26 (2004) 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2003.09.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. N. Dalton & M. T. van Genuchten, The time-domain reflectometry method for measuring soil water content and salinity. Geoderma, 38 (1986) 237-250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. A. Malicki, R. Plagge, & C. H. Roth, Improving the cali-bration of dielectric TDR soil moisture determination taking into account the soild soil. Eur J Soil Sci, 47 (1996) 357-366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Giese & R. Tiemann, Determination of the complex permittivity from thin-sample time domain reflectometry improved analysis of the step response waveform. Advances in Molecular Relaxation Processes, 7 (1975) 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8716(75)80013-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Castiglione & P. J. Shouse, The Effect of Ohmic Cable Losses on Time-Domain Reflectometry Measurements of Electrical Conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67 (2003) 414-424. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.0414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. de C. F. L. Lopes, Microstructural-based approach to the interpretation of clays and transitional soils behaviour, Universidade de Brasília, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Garitte, H. Weber, & H. R. Müller, Requirements, manufacturing and QC of the buffer components Report LUCOEX-WP2 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Cosenza, A. Ghorbani, N. Florsch, & A. Revil, Effects of drying on the low-frequency electrical properties of Tournemire argillites. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 164 (2007) 2043-2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-007-0253-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P. H. Giao, S. G. Chung, D. Y. Kim, & H. Tanaka, Electric imaging and laboratory resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of Pusan clay deposits. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 52 (2003) 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(03)00002-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Rothfuchs, R. Miehe, H. Moog, & K. Wieczorek, Geoelectric Investigation of Bentonite Barrier Saturation (2004). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. A. Ponizovsky & O. A. Salimgaryeyeva, Estimating soil water potential from TDR measurements. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32 (2001) 1829-1839. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120000253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Bianchi, D. Masseroni, M. Thalheimer, L. O. De Medici, & A. Facchi, Field irrigation management through soil water potential measurements : a review. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.19199/2017.2.2038-5625.025. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Bittelli, Measuring soil water potential forwater management in agriculture: A review. Sustainability, 2 (2010) 1226-1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2051226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E. E. Alonso, E. Romero, & C. Hoffmann, Hydromechanical behaviour of compacted granular expansive mixtures: experimental and constitutive study. Géotechnique, 61 (2011) 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2011.61.4.329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. van Genuchten, A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44 (1980) 892-898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Bouksila, M. Persson, R. Berndtsson, & A. Bahri, Soil water content and salinity determination using different dielectric methods in saline gypsiferous soil. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (2008) 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.1.253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.