Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 92, 2019
7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)
Article Number 16009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Numerical Modelling: THCM Coupling, Localisation, Boundary Value Problems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199216009
Published online 25 June 2019
  1. P. Dove, H. Treu, B. Wilde. Suction embedded plate anchor (SEPLA): A new anchoring solution for ultra-deepwater mooring. Proc. Deep Offshore Tech. Conf., New Orleans (1998). [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Wilde, H. Treu, T. Fulton. Field testing of suction embedded plate anchors. Proc. 11th Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf., Stavanger, 544-551 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Gaudin, Y. Tian, M.J. Cassidy, M.F. Randolph, C. O’Loughlin. Design and performance of suction embedded plate anchors. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Frontiers in Offshore Geotech, Oslo, Norway. CRC Press, Leiden, the Netherlands, pp. 863-868 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Song, Y. Hu, C. O’Loughlin, M. Randolph. Loss in anchor embedment during plate anchor keying in clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng, 135, No. 10, 1475-1485 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Yang, C.P. Aubeny, J. D. Murff. Behavior of suction embedded plate anchors during keying process. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng 138, No. 2, 174-183 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Pisano, L. Flessati, C. di Prisco. A macroelement framework for shallow foundations including changes in configuration. Géotechnique, 62, No. 11, 910-926 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. J. Cassidy, C. Gaudin, M.F. Randolph, P.C Wong, D. Wang, Y. Tian. A plasticity model to assess the keying of plate anchors. Géotechnique, 62, No. 9, 825-836 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S.R. Neubecker, M.F. Randolph. Profile and frictional capacity of embedded anchor chains. J. Geotech. Engng, 121, No. 11, 797-803 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Tian, C. Gaudin, M.F. Randolph, M.J. Cassidy. Influence of padeye offset on bearing capacity of three-dimensional plate anchors. Can. Geotech. J. 52, No. 6, 682-693 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Hu, Z. Song. Large deformation FE Analysis of plate anchor keying in clay. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. of IACMAG, Goa, India, pp. 3299-3306 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Song, Y. Hu, D. Wang, C.D. O’Loughlin. Pullout capacity and rotational behaviour of square anchors in kaolin clay and transparent soil. Proc. Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Hong Kong, China, 4-6 August, 1325-1331 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. M.F. Bransby, M. O’Neill. Drag anchor fluke soil interaction in clays. Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, Graz, 489-494 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Elkhatib, M.F. Randolph. The effect of interface friction on the performance of drag-in plate anchors. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotech, Perth, 171-177 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. D. Murff, M.F. Randolph, S. Elkhatib, H.J. Kolk, R. Ruinen, P.J. Strom, C. Thorne. Vertically loaded plate anchors for deep water applications. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotech, Perth, 31-48 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Yang, C.P. Aubeny, J.D. Murff. Behavior of suction embedded plate anchors during keying process. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng 138, No. 2, 174-183 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Wang, Y. Hu, M.F. Randolph. Keying of rectangular plate anchors in normally consolidated clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng 137, No. 12, 1244-1253 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Elkhatib. The behaviour of drag-in plate anchors in soft cohesive soils. PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia (2006). [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Nova, L. Montrasio. Settlements of shallow foundations on sand. Géotechnique, 41, No. 2, 243-256 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Hu, M.F. Randolph. A practical numerical approach for large deformation problems in soil. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 22, No. 5, 327-350 (1998). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.