Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 97, 2019
XXII International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2019)
Article Number 05033
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hydrotechnical Construction and Melioration
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199705033
Published online 29 May 2019
  1. Guidelines for determining the flow of water in the design of transitions through watercourses in the zone of influence of non-capital dams. M .: VNII transport construction, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mastryukov B.S. Safety in emergency situations. M. Academy, 2003 336s [Google Scholar]
  3. Stepanov K.A. A technique to model a breakthrough wave to prevent possible damage caused by land flooding as a result of dam collapse. Scientific Review. Technical science. -2014. №2. Pp. 165-172. [Google Scholar]
  4. Development and creation of a set of measures to ensure the safety of hydraulic structures: A methodological guide. UNECE IFAS. Almaty, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. PP RK No. 171 dated January 30, 2012. “Rules for the operation of water facilities located directly on water bodies”. [Google Scholar]
  6. PP RK №29 from 12.01.2012. “Criteria for the safety of water systems and facilities.” [Google Scholar]
  7. PP RK No. 1449 dated December 31, 2014 “On approval of requirements for organizations certified for the right to work in the field of dam safety”. [Google Scholar]
  8. PP RK № 115 from 10.03.2015. “Rules defining criteria for classifying dams as declared and Rules for developing a dam safety declaration”. [Google Scholar]
  9. GOST R22.1.11-2202 Monitoring of the state of water-supporting hydraulic structures (dams) and forecasting the possible consequences of hydrodynamic accidents on them. General requirements. [Google Scholar]
  10. Karpenchuk I.V., Striganova M.Yu. The method for determining the design parameters and graphing the movement of a breakthrough wave along a water course / I.V. Karpenchuk, // Emergencies: Prevention and Liquidation. 2007. –№ 2 (22). pp. 76–84. [Google Scholar]
  11. Karpenchuk I.V., Striganova M.Yu. The method for determining the design parameters and graphing the movement of a breakthrough wave along a water course / I.V. Karpenchuk, // Emergencies: Prevention and Liquidation. 2007. –№ 2 (22). pp. 76–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. Technical passport of hydraulic engineering facility No. 2 of the Kurtinsky reservoir. RSE “UE BV and BAK them. D. Kunaev.” [Google Scholar]
  13. Rules of operation of the Kurtinsky reservoir. RSE “UE BV and BAK named after Kunayev”, Baiterek village, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Veksler AB, Ivashintsov D.A., Stefanishin D.V. Reliability, social and environmental safety of hydraulic facilities: risk assessment and decision making. St. Petersburg: OJSC VNIIG them. B.V. Vedeneyeva, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stefanishin D.V. Evaluation of the regulatory safety of dams according to risk criteria // Hydraulic Engineering. 1997. № 7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zoteev V. E, Shakhov I. S. Calculation of the risk of emergency situations in small reservoirs // Ecological and water economic Bulletin. 2002. № 6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guidelines for conducting risk analysis of accidents of hydraulic structures: STF VNIIG 230.2.001-00 / VNIIGM B.Ye. Vedeneyeva, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  18. Methods of operational safety assessment of hydraulic structures in long-term operation. M .: NIIES, 1997. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.