EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 111 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 111 (2019) 01041 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 111, 2019
CLIMA 2019 Congress
Article Number 01041
Number of page(s) 6
Section Advanced HVAC&R&S Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911101041
Published online 13 August 2019
  1. M. Lidwell O. Sepsis after Total Hip or Knee Joint Replacement in Relation to Airborne Contamination 1983. 583-92 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gosden PE, MacGowan AP, Bannister GC. Importance of air quality and related factors in the prevention of infection in orthopaedic implant surgery. J Hosp Infect. 1998; 39 (3): 173–80. [Google Scholar]
  3. Verkkala K, Eklund A, Ojajärvi J, Tiittanen L, Hoborn J, Mäkelä P. The conventionally ventilated operating theatre and air contamination control during cardiac surgery – bacteriological and particulate matter control garment options for low level contamination. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 1998; 14 (2): 206–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersson AE, Bergh I, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Nilsson K. Traffic flow in the operating room: an explorative and descriptive study on air quality during orthopedic trauma implant surgery. American journal of infection control. 2012; 40 (8): 750–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hubble MJ, Weale AE, Perez JV, Bowker KE, MacGowan AP, Bannister GC. Clothing in laminar-flow operating theatres. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1996; 32 (1): 1–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hambraeus A, Bengtsson S, Laurell G. Bacterial contamination in a modern operating suite. 3. Importance of floor contamination as a source of airborne bacteria. The Journal of hygiene. 1978; 80 (2): 169-74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aganovic A, Cao G, Stenstad L-I, Skogås JG. Impact of surgical lights on the velocity distribution and airborne contamination level in an operating room with laminar airflow system. Building and Environment. 2017; 126: 42–53. [Google Scholar]
  8. Howorth FH. Prevention of airborne infection during surgery. Lancet (London, England). 1985; 1 (8425): 386–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Whyte W, Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Blowers R. Suggested bacteriological standards for air in ultraclean operating rooms. J Hosp Infect. 1983; 4 (2): 133–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Whyte W, Hodgson R, Tinkler J. The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1982; 3 (2): 123–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen D, Krabs C, Benner D, Brauksiepe A, Popp W. Laminar air flow provides high air quality in the operating field even during real operating conditions, but personal protection seems to be necessary in operations with tissue combustion. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2005; 208 (6): 455–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Memarzadeh F, Manning AP. Comparison of operating room ventilation systems in the protection of the surgical site 2002. 3-15 p. [Google Scholar]
  13. Erichsen Andersson A, Petzold M, Bergh I, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Nilsson K. Comparison between mixed and laminar airflow systems in operating rooms and the influence of human factors: experiences from a Swedish orthopedic center. American journal of infection control. 2014; 42 (6): 665–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brandt C, Hott U, Sohr D, Daschner F, Gastmeier P, Ruden H. Operating room ventilation with laminar airflow shows no protective effect on the surgical site infection rate in orthopedic and abdominal surgery. Annals of surgery. 2008; 248 (5): 695–700. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C, Wyatt MC. Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement? The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2011; 93-B(1): 85-90. [Google Scholar]
  16. Breier AC, Brandt C, Sohr D, Geffers C, Gastmeier P. Laminar airflow ceiling size: no impact on infection rates following hip and knee prosthesis. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2011; 32 (11): 1097–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. W.H.O. WHO Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. WHO Press. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cacciari P, Giannoni R, Marcelli E, Cercenelli L. [Cost evaluation of a ventilation system for operating theatre: an ultraclean design versus a conventional one]. Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita. 2004; 16 (6): 803–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ahl T, Dalen N, Jorbeck H, Hoborn J. Air contamination during hip and knee arthroplasties. Horizontal laminar flow randomized vs. conventional ventilation. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1995; 66 (1): 17–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tammelin A, Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B. Comparison of three distinct surgical clothing systems for protection from air-borne bacteria: A prospective observational study. Patient safety in surgery. 2012; 6 (1): 23–. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tammelin A, Ljungqvist B, Reinmuller B. Single-use surgical clothing system for reduction of airborne bacteria in the operating room. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 84 (3): 245–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kasina P, Tammelin A, Blomfeldt A-M, Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B, Ottosson C. Comparison of three distinct clean air suits to decrease the bacterial load in the operating room: an observational study. Patient safety in surgery. 2016; 10: 1–. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Turtiainen J, Hakala T, Hakkarainen T, Karhukorpi J. The Impact of Surgical Wound Bacterial Colonization on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection After Lower Limb Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2014; 47 (4): 411–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuchs E, Raghavan S. Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2002; 3: 199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Noble WC. Dispersal of skin microorganisms. The British journal of dermatology. 1975; 93 (4): 477–85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Surgical drapes, gowns and clean air suits, used as medical devices for patients, clinical staff and equipment - General requirements for manufacturers, processors and products, test methods, performance requirements and performance levels. EN 137952011+A1:2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Whyte W, Vesley D, Hodgson R. Bacterial dispersion in relation to operating room clothing. The Journal of hygiene. 1976; 76 (3): 367–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scaltriti S, Cencetti S, Rovesti S, Marchesi I, Bargellini A, Borella P. Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres. J Hosp Infect. 2007; 66 (4): 320–6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sehulster L, Chinn RY. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports. 2003; 52 (Rr-10): 1-42. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.