Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 111, 2019
CLIMA 2019 Congress
Article Number 03026
Number of page(s) 7
Section High Energy Performance and Sustainable Buildings
Published online 13 August 2019
  1. EU. High Energy Performing Buildings: Support for innovation and market uptake under Horizon 2020 energy efficiency, Publication of the European Union, Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. K.B. Janda. Buildings don’t use energy: people do. Architectural Science Review, 54:1, pp. 15–22, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Shove. Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy, 26, pp. 1105–1112 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  4. K.B. Janda. Building communities and social potential: Between and beyond organizations and individuals in commercial properties. Energy Policy, 67, pp. 48–55 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Moezzi, M. Iyer, L. Lutzenhiser, J. Woods. Behavioral Assumptions in Energy Efficiency Potential Studies. Oakland, CA: California Institute for Energy Efficiency (2009). [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Moezzi, K.B. Janda. From “if only” to “social potential” in schemes to reduce building energy use. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, pp. 30–40 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. B.K. Sovacool. Energy studies need social science. Nature, 511, (7511), pp. 529–530 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. D’Oca, C-F. Chen, T. Hong, Z. Belafi. Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: An interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings. Energy Research & Social Science, 34, pp. 204–251 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Cooper. Building a socio-technical energy research community: Theory, practice and impact. Energy Research & Social Science, 26, pp. 115–120 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Galvin. Humans and stuff: Interweaving social and physical science in energy policy research. Energy Research & Social Science, 26, pp. 98–102 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Gluesing. Being There: The Power of Conventional Ethnographic Methods. In Advancing Ethnography in Corporate Environments: Challenges and Emerging Opportunities, ed. Brigitte Jordan. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press Inc. pp. 23-37 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Jordan, B. Dalal. 2006. Persuasive Encounters: Ethnography in the Corporation. Field Methods, 18 (4), pp. 1-24 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Mackley, S. Pink. From Emplaced Knowing to Interdisciplinary Knowledge. The Senses and Society, 8:3, pp. 335–353 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Cefkin. Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Ladner, Sam. Practical Ethnography: A Guide to Doing Ethnography in the Private Sector. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Pink, J. Morgan. Short-term Ethnography: Intense Routes to Knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36 (3), pp. 351–361 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.