Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 111, 2019
CLIMA 2019 Congress
Article Number 03028
Number of page(s) 8
Section High Energy Performance and Sustainable Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911103028
Published online 13 August 2019
  1. L.P. Lombard, J. Ortiz, C. Pout, A review on buildings energy consumption information, Energy and Buildings, 40 (2008) 394–398. [Google Scholar]
  2. Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the Energy Performance of Buildings, Official Journal of the European Union 1 (2003) 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  3. EPBD recast. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Official Journal of the European Union, 153 (2010) 13–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. http://www.epbd-ca.eu [Google Scholar]
  5. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements, Official Journal of the European Union, 81 (2012) 18-36. [Google Scholar]
  6. Notices from European Union Institutions, Bodies, Offices and Agencies-European Commission-Guidelines accompanying Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements, Official Journal of the European Union, 115 (2012) 1–28 [Google Scholar]
  7. Turkish Standardization Institute, TS825: Thermal insulation requirements for buildings, TSE, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Building’s Energy Performance of Turkey (Bep-Tr), Official Gazette, No: 27075 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Aguacil, S. Lufkin, E. Rey, A. Cuchi, Application of the cost-optimal methodology to urban renewal projects at the territorial scale based on statistical data - A case study in Spain, Energy and Buildings, 144 (2017) 42–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dasgupta, M. Roberts, P. Cropper, Barriers to achieving Energy and Carbon reductions in New-Built and Refurbished schools in England, 7th International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings IEECB’12, Frankfurt, Germany, 2013, pp. 6-18. [Google Scholar]
  11. National Education Statistics-Formal Education-2013/2014, (2014), National Education Strategy Development Presidency. [Google Scholar]
  12. L. F.Cabeza, L. Rincón, V. Vilariño, G. Pérez, A. Castell, Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life-cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 394–416 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Ramesh, R. Prakash, K.K. Shukla, Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy and Buildings, 10 (2010) 1592–1600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. K. C. Ding, Life cycle energy assessment of Australian secondary schools, Building research & information, 35 (2007) 487–500 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. D. Mangan, G. Koclar Oral, Assessment of residential building performances for the different climate zones of Turkey in terms of life cycle energy and cost efficiency, Energy and Buildings, 110 (2016) 362–376 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iso14040 Environmental management life cycle assessment principles and framework. Geneva: International Standards Organization; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. BS EN 15643-2, Sustainability of Construction Works-Assessment of Buildings - Part 2: Framework for the Assessment of Environmental Performance, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Wallhagen, M. Glaumann, T. Malmqvis, Basic building life cycle calculations to decrease contribution to climate change case study on an office building in Sweden. Building and Environment 46 (2011) 1863-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sartori, A.G. Hestnes, Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy and Buildings 39 (2007) 249–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Köse, O. Barkul, A Study on the Problems of the Implementation of Project Type Primary Structures, MEGARON, 7 (2012) 94-102. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
  21. Turkish Standards Institution, TS 825: Buildings’ thermal insulation requirements. Ankara 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. GABI Software. GABI 6.0 User Manual. Germany: PE International; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Al. C. Diaz, Energy Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of silicon-based photovoltaic technologies and the influence of where it is manufactured and installed, Master thesis of renewable energy and energy sustainability, University of Barcelona, 2013-2014 [Google Scholar]
  24. Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Building’s Energy Performance of Turkey (Bep-Tr), Official Gazette, 27075 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. https://www.designbuilder.co.uk/ [Google Scholar]
  26. https://energyplus.net/ [Google Scholar]
  27. Turkish Green Building Council (CEDBIK), Green Building Certification Guide for New Houses (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.