Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 125, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2019)
Article Number 07020
Number of page(s) 8
Section Waste Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912507020
Published online 28 October 2019
  1. The Republic of Indonesia President Regulation Number 8 of 2008 on National Disaster Management Agency. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Kahar, P. Purwanto, W. K. Hidajat, Dampak Penurunan Tanah dan Kenaikan Muka Laut Terhadap Luasan Genangan Rob di Semarang, Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, 7(2), 83-91. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. D. A. Putra, W. Handayani, Kajian Bentuk Adaptasi terhadap Banjir dan Rob Berdasarkan Karakteristik Wilayah dan Aktivitas di Kelurahan Tanjung Mas, Jurnak Teknik PWK, 2 (3). (2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. A.S. Ramadhany, P. Subardjo, A.A.D. Suryo, Daerah Rawan Genangan Rob di Wilayah Semarang, Journal of Marine Research, 1(2), pp.174-180. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. S.H. Nugroho, Prediksi luas genangan pasang surut (rob) berdasarkan analisis data spasial di Kota Semarang, Indonesia, Jurnal Lingkungan dan Bencana Geologi, 4(1), pp.71-87. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Buchori, A. Sugiri, M. Mussadun, D. Wadley, Y. Liu, A. Pramitasari, I.T. Pamungkas, A predictive model to assess spatial planning in addressing hydro-meteorological hazards: a case study of Semarang City, Indonesia, International journal of disaster risk reduction, 27, 415-426. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Handoyo, Suryoputro, A.D Agus, dan P. Subardjo, Genangan Banjir Rob di Kecamatan Semarang Utara, Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 19 (1): 55-59. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maryono, Evaluation of Disaster Resilience on Waste Management in Developing Countries. Doctor Disertation, Departement of Urban and Enviromental Engineering, Khusyu University. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. C.O. Brown, Disaster Waste Management: a systems approach, University of Canterbury. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. J.R. Chen, H.Y. Tsai, P.C. Hsu, C.C. Shen, Estimation of waste generation from floods, Waste management, 27(12), pp.1717-1724. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Nakayama, T. Shimaoka, K. Omine, Maryono, P. Patsaraporn, and O. Siriratpiriya, Solid Waste Management in Bangkok at 2011 Thailand Floods, J. Disaster Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 356–346. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Tempo.co. BMKG: Sepekan ke Depan Tinggi Rob Pantura Mencapai 1 Meter. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/782171/bmkg-sepekan-ke-depan-tinggi-rob-pantura-mencapai-1-meter/full&view=ok. 8 Juli 2019. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. Law No. 18 of 2008 Regarding Waste Management. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Aida, Eksternalitas (Negatif) dan Lingkungan Hidup, JAMSWAP, 1(1), pp.88-94. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. D.N. Hyman, Public finance: A contemporary application of theory to policy, Cengage Learning. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Ruban, E.I.K. Putri, Ekayani, Willingness to Pay Masyarakat Terhadap Pengolahan Sampah Ramah Lingkungan di TPA Dusun Toisapu Kota Ambon, Journal of Agriculture, Resource and Environmental Economics, 1(1). (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. Atlantic Coastal Action Program (ACAP), Handbook on Environmental Economics, Environment Canada Atlantic Region. Dartmouth. (1996). [Google Scholar]
  18. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cost Accounting for Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Handbook, EPA 530-R-95-041. Washington DC. (1997). [Google Scholar]
  19. AACE, International Recommended Practice No.10S-90 Cost Engineering Terminology Tcm Framework: General Reference, Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Debnath, S.K. Bose, Exploring full cost accounting approach to evaluate cost of MSW services in India, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, pp.87-95. (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maryono, H. Nakayama, and T. Shimaoka, ‘Identification of Factors Affecting Stakeholders’ Intentions to Promote Preparedness in Disaster Waste Management: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach’, J. Mem. Fac. Eng. Kyushu Univ., 74, no. 3, pp. 79–98. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Tabata, Y. Wakabayashi, P. Tsai, T. Saeki, Environmental and Economic Evaluation of Pre-Disaster Plans for Disaster Waste Management: Case Study of Minami-Ise, Japan, Waste Management, 61, 386–396. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Brown, M. Milke, Recycling Disaster Waste: Feasibility, Method, and Effectiveness. Journal Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 106, 21-32. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). Flood Waste Management Guidelines for Bangkok. Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management Research National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). Ibaraki. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. National Disaster Management Agency Regulation No. 2 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for Implementing Use of Disaster Management Special Equipment. [Google Scholar]
  26. Regulation of the Minister of Public Works of the Republic of Indonesia No.03/PRT/M/2013 Regarding the Implementation of Infrastructure and Solid Waste Facilities in Handling Household and Similar Waste. [Google Scholar]
  27. Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia No PER.08/MEN/VII/2010 Regarding Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). [Google Scholar]
  28. Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia No.PER.15/MEN/VIII/2008 Regarding First Aid in Accidents at the Workplace. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sustainable Heritage Network (SHN). Disaster Response Equipment. https://sustainableheritagenetwork.org/digital-heritage/disaster-response-equipment-checklist. 8 Juli 2019. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  30. Central Statistics Agency on North Semarang Sub-District in Figures year 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.