Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 145, 2020
2019 International Academic Exchange Conference on Science and Technology Innovation (IAECST 2019)
Article Number 02038
Number of page(s) 5
Section International Conference on New Energy Science and Environmental Engineering
Published online 06 February 2020
  1. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R. et al. (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,387: 253-260. [Google Scholar]
  2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment [M]. Washington DC: Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Z., Wu, Z., Xia, N., et al. (2007) Development of ecological capital valuation in China(J). Ecology and Environment, 16(2):680-685. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu, Z., Li, W., Min, Q., et al. (2005) Changes in Value of Ecosystem Services in Xilin River Basin [J]. 20(1): 99-104. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ou Yang Z.,Zhao T., Wang X., Miao, H., et al. (2004) Ecosystem Services Analyses and Valuation of China Terrestrial Surface Water System[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(10): 2091-2099. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu, X., Lu, S., Jin F. (2005) Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services Value in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25(8): 2096-2102. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hou, Y., Zhang, P., Wang. Q., et al. (1995) Evaluation of Forest Resources in China [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Robert C., et al. (1997) the Value of the Worlds Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital [J]. Nature. Vol387. [Google Scholar]
  9. Loomis, J., Ekstrand, E. (1998) Alternative Approaches for Incorporating Respondent Uncertainty when Estimating Willingness to Pay:The Case of the Mexican Spotted Owl [J] . Ecolog. Ecom. 27: 29- 41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ready, R, Whitehead, J., Blomquist, G. (1995) Contingent Valuat ion when Respondents are Ambivalent [J]. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 29: 181-96. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornelis Van Kooten G., et al. (2001) Preference Uncertainty in Non-market Valuation: A Fuzzy Approach [ J]. Amer. J. Ag r. Econ. 83 (3): 487- 500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li C, Mattsson L. (1995) Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation[J]. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 28: 256- 69. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Y., Ma, J., Jin, X., et al. (2005) Summary of assessment methods for valuation of ecosystem service function. China Population, Resources and Environment, 15(1): 88-92. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, Z., Fan, X. (2007) Concept, characteristics and research trend of ecological assets [J].Environmental Science Research, 20(5):137-143. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.