Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 161, 2020
International Conference on Efficient Production and Processing (ICEPP-2020)
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016101015
Published online 15 April 2020
  1. M. Arkhipova, V. Sirotin, Cooperation and partnership in innovative development of Russian Federation, Proc. 9th European Conf. on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Belfast, Belfast: University of Ulster, 410-419 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Blind, The influence of regulations on innovation: a quantitative assessment for OECD countries, Research Policy, 41, 391-400 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Chandra, I. Osorio-Rodarte, C.A. Primo Braga, Korea and the BICs, Brazil, India and China: Catching-up Experiences, Innovation and Growth Chasing a Moving Frontier, Paris: The World Bank, 25-67 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, OECD Publishing, (2013). DOI: 10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-en. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting. Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th ed., OECD publishing (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Bogliacino, M. Pianta, Engines of growth. Innovation and productivity in industry groups, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22, 41-53 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Edwards-Schachter, E. Castro-Martínez, M. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, Motives for international cooperation on R&D and innovation: empirical evidence from Argentinean and Spanish firms, Int J of Technology management, 62, 128-151 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Geum, S. Lee, B. Yoon, Y. Park, Identifying and evaluating strategic partners for collaborative R&D: Index-based approach using patents and publications, Technovation, 33, 211-224 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Gokhberg, Transformation of R&D in the post-socialist countries: Partners and trends. Innovation and Structural Change in Post-Socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach, D. ed S. Dyker and S. Radosevic, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Hagedoorn, Organizational modes of inter-firm cooperation and technology transfers, Technovation, 10, 17-30 (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Barros, The Effects of Innovation Partnership, Foreign Ownership and Enhanced Management Practices on the Use of Patents in Brazilian Manufacturing, Proc. EuroMOT, Hsinchu, Taiwan (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Teece, Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Strategic Management and Research Policy, Singapore: McGraw Hill Int. Ed. (2004). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Porter, N. Newman, Xao-Yin Jin, D. Johnson, J. Roessner, High Tech Indicators-based Competitiveness of 33 Nations report, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332-0345 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Private Partnerships for Research and Innovation: an Evaluation of Dutch Experience, Paris: OECD (2004). [Google Scholar]
  15. Regions of Russia: Social and Economic Indicators (2018) [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru. [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Sirotin, M. Arkhipova, Cooperation and Innovation Activity: study of the relationship at the regional level, Proc 10th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Genoa, Italy, ed. L Beltrametti and R P Dameri, Genoa: University of Genoa, 673-682 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.