Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 161, 2020
International Conference on Efficient Production and Processing (ICEPP-2020)
Article Number 01092
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 15 April 2020
  1. A. Tullo, Chemical and engineering news, C&EN’s Global Top 50 chemical companies of 2018, 97 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. Site of the United National [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Imai, Gemba Kaizen: A commonsense approach to a continuous improvement strategy, McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, 384 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Zohoori, A. Ghani, H. Zakeri, Impact of Cleaner Production and Environmental Management on Sustainable Product Innovation and Performance: A study of Manufacturing Industry of Iran, International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 6, 8-12 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K.H. Tsai, Y.Ch. Liao, Innovation Capacity and the Implementation of Eco-innovation: Toward a Contingency Perspective, Business Strategy and the Environment (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Aronov, V. Versan, Technical regulation as a tool for innovation, Standards and quality, 24-28 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Scott, J. Scott, Standards and the incentives for innovation, SSRN Electronic Journal (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Blind, The impact of standardization and standards on innovation, 33 (2013) [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Caetano, Standardization and Innovation Management, Journal of innovation management, 5, 8-14 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. European Commission [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Porter, C. Van der Linde, Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 4, 97-118 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T.J. Lah, S. Park, Same material different recycling standards: comparing the municipal solid waste standards of the European Union, South Korea and the USA, International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 21, 1 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. De Bree, Waste and innovation. How waste companies and government can interact to stimulate innovation in the Dutch waste industry, Thesis Delft University of Technology, 144 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Jilcha, D. Kitaw, Impact of quality on global competitiveness in chemical manufacturing industries, 29 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. Sh. Kyokaishi, Summary of EU REACH Regulation, Journal of the Japan society of colour material, 90, 343-346 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Elsmore, M. Urbanowska, Regulatory challenges: REACH regulation in 2017 and beyond, Chemistry today, 35, 38-40 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Nagasato, A study on the environmental regulations and innovation: the case of the European REACH regulation, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Arfaoui, Eco-innovation and regulatory push/pull effect in the case of REACH regulation: empirical evidence based on survey data, Applied Economics, 50, 2, 1-19 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. Evaluation under REACH: Progress Report 2017 10 years of experience, European Chemicals Agency (2018) [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Chatterjee, K. Gupta, T. Chatterjee, Revisiting the conflicts between environmental taxes vs standard in the context of international trade, International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management, 6, 13-29 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Mangelsdorf, The role of technical standards for trade between China and the European Union, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 23, 7, 725-743 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Role of standards, A guide for small and medium-size enterprises, United National industrial development organization, 26 (2006) [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  23. W.B. Gray, Environmental regulations and business decisions, IZA World of Labor, 1-10 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. European Commission of taxation and Customs Union [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  25. European Commission on the environment (chemicals) [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  26. Secretariat of the Basel Convention [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  27. International Organization for Standardization [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  28. Patents related to recycling and secondary raw materials [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  29. Global Green Economy Index [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  30. Made in country Index [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  31. Production and international trade in chemicals [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  32. Industrial waste in Europe [Electronic resource]. Available at: [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.