EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 165 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 165 (2020) 04073 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2020
2020 2nd International Conference on Civil Architecture and Energy Science (CAES 2020)
Article Number 04073
Number of page(s) 9
Section Civil, Architectural Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016504073
Published online 01 May 2020
  1. Du X.L., Xu Z.G., Xu C.S., et al. (2018) Inertia force-displacement method for seismic analysis of shallow buried underground structures. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 40(4): 584-591. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dong L., Wang L.M., Xia K., et al. (2017) Comparison of CPT-based and SPT-based liquefaction discrimination methods by Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake data. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 38(12): 3643-3648. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun Y.W., Li P., Bo J.S., et al. (2010) Damage investigation and cause analysis of Longxi tunnel in Wenchuan great earthquake. World Earthquake Engineering, 26(Supp): 187-191. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tao L.J., Li S.L., Hou S., et al. (2016) Shaking table test for seismic response in portal section of mountain tunnel. World Earthquake Engineering, 32(4): 7-16. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhao X., Hua C.Y., Zhao M., et al. (2017) Study on seismic stability of a tunnel portal section based on the strength reduction method. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 39(6): 1029-1036. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sui C.Y., Gao B., Shen Y.S., et al. (2017) Shaking table tests and analysis on tunnel structures with high steep slope. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36(19): 186-194. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu G.Q., Chen J.T., Xiao M., et al. (2018) Dynamic response simulation of lining structure for tunnel portal section under seismic load. Shock and Vibration, (6): 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu D., Gao B., Shen Y.S., et al. (2015) Damage evolution of tunnel portal during the longitudinal propagation of Rayleigh waves. Natural Hazards, 75(3): 2519-2543. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen Y.S., Gao B., Yang X.M., et al. (2014) Seismic damage mechanism and dynamic deformation characteristic analysis of mountain tunnel after Wenchuan earthquake. Engineering Geology, 180: 85-98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cui G.Y., Wang M.N., Yu L., et al. (2013) Seismic damage and mechanism of portal structure of highway tunnels in Wenchuan Earthquake, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 35(6): 1084-1091. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen G.H., Li H.Q., Zhong Y., et al. (2008) Seismic tunnel damage investigation and analysis of G213 Dujiangyan to wenchuan section. Xi Nan Gong Lu, 4: 114-119. [Google Scholar]
  12. LI T.B. (2012) Damage to mountain tunnels related to the Wenchuan earthquake and some suggestions for aseismic tunnel construction. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment, 71: 297-308. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang W.L., Wang T.T., Su J.J., et al. (2001) Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 16: 133-150. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cui G.Y., Wu X.G., Wang M.N. et al. (2017) Earthquake Damages and Characteristics of Highway Tunnels in the 8.0-Magnitude Wenchuan Earthquake. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 54(2): 9-16. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zang W.J. (2017) Damage to Highway Tunnels Caused by the Wenchuan Earthquake. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 54(2): 12-25. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fan Z.F., Zhang J.C., Xu H. (2019) Theoretical study of the dynamic response of a circular lined tunnel with an imperfect interface subjected to incident SV-waves. Computers and Geotechnics 110: 308-318. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fan Z.F., Zhang J.C., Xu H., et al. (2019) Transmission of normal p-wave across a single joint based on g-λ model. Shock and Vibration. 2019:1-10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu J.S., Xu H., Sun R.F., et al. (2020) Seismic risk evaluation for a planning mountain tunnel using improved analytical hierarchy process based on extension theory. Journal of Mountain Science 17(1): 244-260. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ye H.L., Zheng Y.R., Du X.L., et al. (2012) Shaking table model test and numerical analysis on dynamic failure characteristics of slope. China Civil Engineering Journal, 45(9): 128-135. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan G., Zhang J.J., Fu X., et al. (2015) Large-scale shaking table test on dynamic response of bedding rock slopes with silt intercalation. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 34(9): 1750-1757. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hashash Y.M.A., Hook J.J., Schmidt B., et al. (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 16(4): 247-293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu H., Li T.B., Xia L., et al. (2016) Shaking table tests on seismic measures of a model mountain tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 60: 197-209. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu Y.L., Gu X.L., et al. Judgment and treatment of cracks in concrete structure engineering[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ministry of housing and urban-rural development of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of concrete structures: GB 50010-2010[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu H., Li T.B., Wang D., et al. (2013) Study of seismic responses of mountain tunnels with 3D shaking table model test. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 32(9). [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Z.Z., Shen J.H., Gu T., et al. (2009) Essentials of the excavation and monitoring for twin closely-spaced tunnels embedded in slidding rock. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 46(5): 40-44. [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang H.W., Liu D.J., Xue Y.D., et al. (2013) Numerical analysis of cracking of tunnel linings based on extended finite element. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 35(2): 266-275. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.