Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 166, 2020
The International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2020)
Article Number 10011
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610011
Published online 22 April 2020
  1. Higher School Mathematics Teacher (2019), http://formathematics.com. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  2. Writing and Structuring Online Learning Materials (Leicester Learning Institute, 2019), https://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/lli/case-studies-and-resources/repository/learning-and-teachingresources/writing-and-structuring-online-learningmaterials-pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  3. The methodology for preparation of materials for online courses (2019), http://www.aereform.si/DIGICOMP/Methodology.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  4. Leicester Learning Institute (2019), https://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/lli. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  5. Methods for teaching mathematics to students in technical universities (2019), http://formathematics.com/courses/instruction-and-methodology-trainings/method-of-trainingmathematics-at-higher-technical-school/. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Ghirardini. E-learning methodologies. A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Vlasenko, O. Chumak, I. Sitak, I. Lovianova, O. Kondratyeva, Training of mathematical disciplines teachers for higher educational institutions as a contemporary problem. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(9), 1892–1900 (2019). doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.070907 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C.J. Dommeyer, P. Baum, R.W. Hanna, K.S. Chapman, Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29(5), 611–623 (2004). doi:10.1080/02602930410001689171 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D.J. Deming, C. Goldin, L.F. Katz, N. Yuchtman, Can online learning bend the higher education cost curve? American Economic Review 105(5), 496–501 (2015). doi:10.1257/aer.p20151024 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Bauer, Translating a successful lecture into online course content – experiences of a control engineering lecturer. IFAC PapersOnLine 52(9), 272–277 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.220 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Cruse, Using educational video in the classroom: theory, research and practice (Library Video Company, 2019), http://www.libraryvideo.com/articles/article26.asp. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  12. A.-M. Suduc, M. Bizoi, F. Filip, Decision support systems for partnership activities facilitation. IFAC Proceedings J. 43(8), 59–62 (2010). doi:10.3182/20100712-3-FR-2020.00010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Suduc, M. Bîzoi, G. Gorghiu, L. Gorghiu, Digital images, video and web conferences in education: A case study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 4102–4106 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.207 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Suwatthipong, C. Thangkabutra, N. Lawthong, A proposed model of knowledge sharing to develop educational, computer standardized test in higher education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 191, 93–97 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.253 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Wrigley, G. Mosely, M. Tomitsch, Design thinking education: A comparison of massive open online courses. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 4, 275–292 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B.-A. Jönsson, A case study of successful elearning: a web-based distance course in medical physics held for school teachers of the upper secondary level. Medical Engineering and Physics 27(7), 571–581 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.11.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Vlasenko, S. Volkov, D. Kovalenko, I. Sitak et al, Web-based online-course training higher school mathematics teachers. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2020, in press) [Google Scholar]
  18. Top Tools for Learning 2019 (2019), http://c4lpt.co.uk/directory-of-learning-performance-tools/collections-of-online-coursesand-resources/. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  19. LinkedIn Learning [Lynda] (2019), https://www.linkedin.com/learning. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  20. Udemy (2019), https://www.udemy.com/. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  21. Coursera (2019), https://www.coursera.org/. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  22. EdX (2019), https://www.edx.org/. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  23. FutureLearn (2019), https://www.futurelearn.com/. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Cuesta, Profile 12(1), 181 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. S.J. McGahan, C.M. Jackson, K. Premer, InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching 10, 126 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  26. APass Educational Group.LLC. Quality matters: A guide to online course development standards (2019), https://apasseducation.com/education-blog/quality-matters-online-course-standards/. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  27. N.I. Scagnoli, J. Choo, J. Tian, Students’ insights on the use of video lectures in online classes. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(1), 399–414 (2019). doi:10.1111/bjet.12572 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Morrison, Seven must-read books about education: the 2017 list (Online Learning Insights, 2019), https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/author/onlinelearninginsights/. Accessed 21 Nov 2019 [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Puzziferro, K. Shelton, A model for developing high-quality online courses: integrating a systems approach with learning theory. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12(3-4), 119–136 (2019). doi:10.24059/olj.v12i3.58 [Google Scholar]
  30. Quora. Why should I use Camtasia? (2019), https://www.quora.com/Why-should-I-use-Camtasia. Accessed 18 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  31. T. Martin-Blas, A. Serrano-Fernandez, The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education 52, 35–44 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.