EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 184 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 184 (2020) 01092 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 184, 2020
2nd International Conference on Design and Manufacturing Aspects for Sustainable Energy (ICMED 2020)
Article Number 01092
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018401092
Published online 19 August 2020
  1. Aleem M.A., & Arumairaj P.D. (2012). Geopolymer concrete-a review. International journal of engineering sciences & emerging technologies, 1(2), 118-122. [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh A.K. (2016). Strength and Durability Test of Fly Ash and GGBS Based Geopolymer Concrete. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Application ISSN, 2248-9622. [Google Scholar]
  3. Venkatesan R.P., & Pazhani K.C. (2016). Strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete made with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(6), 2384-2391. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thokchom, S., Ghosh, P., & Ghosh S. (2009). Effect of water absorption, porosity and sorptivity on durability of geopolymer mortars. ARPN Journal of engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(7), 28-32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Naspuri Arun Raju, T. Suresh Kumar, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, Vol. 8 no. 11, pp: 3860-3864, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. Lavanya, G, & Jegan, J. (2015). Durability study on high calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Adak, D., Sarkar, M, & Mandal, S. (2014). Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 70, 453-459. [Google Scholar]
  8. Raijiwala D.B., Patil H.S., & Kundan I.U. (2012). Effect of alkaline activator on the strength and durability of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, 3 (1), 18-21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thokchom, S., Ghosh, P., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Durability of fly ash geopolymer mortars in nitric acid–effect of alkali (Na2o) content. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 17 (3), 393-399. [Google Scholar]
  10. Anchula Nagarjuna, T. Suresh Kumar, B.Yogeswara Reddy, M. Udaykiran, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, Vol. 8 no. 11, pp: 640-645, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. Okoye F.N., Prakash, S., & Singh N.B. (2017). Durability of fly ash based geopolymer concrete in the presence of silica fume. Journal of cleaner Production, 149, 1062-1067. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jindal B.B. (2019). Investigations on the properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116644. [Google Scholar]
  13. Luhar, S., & Khandelwal, U. (2015). A study on water absorption and sorptivity of geopolymer concrete. SSRG Int. J. Civil Eng., 2 (8), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Thunuguntla C.S., & Rao T.G. (2018). Effect of mix design parameters on mechanical and durability properties of alkali activated slag concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 193, 173-188. [Google Scholar]
  15. JayShankar T.N., & Nagaraja P.S. (2018). Evaluation of Water Absorption and Sorptivity Properties of Fly Ash, GGBS, M-Sand Based Glass Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete. [Google Scholar]
  16. Purushotham, P., Prasad M.H., & Naveen, P. (2017). A study on green concrete. [Google Scholar]
  17. Huseien G.F., Mirza, J., Ismail, M., Hussin M.W., Arrifin M.A.M., & Hussein A.A. (2016). The effect of sodium hydroxide molarity and other parameters on water absorption of geopolymer mortars. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (48), 1-7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Farhana Z.F., Kamarudin, H., Rahmat, A., & Al Bakri A.M. (2015). The relationship between water absorption and porosity for geopolymer paste. In Materials Science Forum (Vol. 803, pp. 166-172). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thokchom, S., Dutta, D., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Effect of incorporating silica fume in fly ash geopolymers. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 60, 243-247. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rajamane N.P., Nataraja M.C., Lakshmanan, N., Dattatreya J.K., & Sabitha, D. (2012). Sulphuric acid resistant ecofriendly concrete from geopolymerisation of blast furnace slag. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shraddha P.S., & Madhuri, M. Compative Study on Acid Resistance of Geopolymer Concrete to Conventional Concrete. [Google Scholar]
  22. Aiken T.A., Kwasny, J., Sha, W., & Soutsos M.N. (2018). Effect of slag content and activator dosage on the resistance of fly ash geopolymer binders to sulfuric acid attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 111, 23-40. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dave S.V., Bhogayata A.C., & Arora N.K. DURABILITY STUDY OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE CURED AT AMBIENT TEMPERATURE. [Google Scholar]
  24. Thokchom, S., Ghosh, P., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Durability of fly ash geopolymer mortars in nitric acid–effect of alkali (Na2o) content. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 17 (3), 393-399. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thokchom, S., Ghosh, P., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer mortars. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 1 (6), 36. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tummala Suresh Kumar, Kosaraju Satyanarayana, Materials Today: Proceeding, 26 (2), 3228-3233, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shaikh F.U. (2014). Effects of alkali solutions on corrosion durability of geopolymer concrete. Advances in concrete construction, 2 (2), 109. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.