EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 194 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 194 (2020) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 194, 2020
2020 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2020)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Protection and Pollution Control
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019404002
Published online 15 October 2020
  1. Qilu Tan, Analysis on the co-benefits of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from main sectors in China [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2001: Mitigation of climate change-Contribution of Working Group III to the third assessment report of IPCC [M], Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qilu Tan, and Hongwei Yang. Co-benefit analysis of greenhouse gases and local air pollutants mitigation for transportation sector in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, climate change, 2017, 39(4: 25-31. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bollen J, Guay B, Jamet S, et al. Co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies: literature review and new results [R]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. EPA, Co-benefits definition [EB/OL], (2013-02-21), http://ofmpub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/termreg/searchandretrieve/termsandacronyms/search.do?matchCriteria=Contains&checkedTerm=on&checkedAcronym=on&search=Search&term=co-benefits. [Google Scholar]
  6. EEA, What actions can be taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions [EB/OL], (2007-12-10), http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/climate/faq/what-actions-can-be-taken-to-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions. [Google Scholar]
  7. Overseas Environmental Cooperation Center, Co-benefits approach to climate change and CDM in developing countries [R], Tokyo, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Vuuren D.P., Cofala J, Eerens H.E., et al, Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe[J], Energy Policy, 2006(4): 444-460. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rypdal K, Rive N, Astrom S, et al, Nordic air quality co-benefits from European post-2012 climate policies[J], Energy Policy, 2007(12): 6309-6322. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dudek D, Golub A, Strukova E, Ancillary benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in transitional economies[J], World Development, 2003(10): 1759-1769. [Google Scholar]
  11. Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Palmer K, et al, Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector[J, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003(3): 650-673. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dessus S, O’Connor D,, Climate Policy without tears: CGE-based ancillary benefits estimates for Chile[J],Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003(3): 287-317. [Google Scholar]
  13. Aunan K, Fang J.H., Vennemo H, et al, Co-benefits of climate policy-lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China[J],Energy Policy, 2004(4): 567-581. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shih Y.H., Tseng C.H.., Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach[J], Applied Energy, 2014(119): 57-66. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bollen J, Van Der Zwaan B, Brink C, et al, Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefits analysis[J], Resource and Energy Economics, 2009(3): 161-181. [Google Scholar]
  16. Williams C, Hasanbeigi A, Wu G, et al, International Experience with Quantifying the Co-Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Programs and Policies[J], Science and Management, 2013(3): 3-6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Amann M, Bertok I, Borken Kleefeld J, et al, Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications[J], Environmental Modeling & Software, 2011(12): 1489-1501. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Harmelen T, Bakker J, De Vries B, et al, Long-term reduction in costs of controlling regional air pollution in Europe due to climate change[J], Environmental Science & Policy, 2002(4): 349-365. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nathan R, Climate policy in Western Europe and avoided costs of air pollution control[J], Economic Modeling, 2010, 25(7: 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Alcamo J, Mayerhofer P, Guardans R, et al, An integrated assessment of regional air pollution and climate change in Europe: Findings of the AIRCLIM Project[J], Environmental Science &Policy, 2002(4): 257-272. [Google Scholar]
  21. Alcamo J, Shaw R, Hordijk L,, The RAINS model of acidification: science and strategies in Europe[M], Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  22. Haidong, Kan and Bingheng Chen, Greenhouse gas mitigation policies and their ancillary effects [J], Journal of Environment and Health, 2001(5): 316-318. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yedla S, Park H, S., Co-benefit as an approach to align climate change concerns with national development objectives: solid waste management[J], Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2009(2): 123-129. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shrestha R.M., Pradhan S,, Co-benefits of CO2 emission reduction in a developing country[J], Energy Policy, 2010(5): 2586-2597. [Google Scholar]
  25. Anuan K, Patzay G, Asbjorn Aaheim H, et al, Health and environmental benefits from air pollution reduction in Hungary[J], Science of the Total Environment, 1998(2-3): 245-268. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jochem E, Madlener R,, The forgotten benefits of climate change mitigation: Innovation, technological leapfrogging, employment, and sustainable development[C], OECD Workshop on the Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policy Makers, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Qilu Tan, Zongguo Wen, and Hongwei Yang, Review and recommendations on the co-benefit effects of controlling greenhouse gases and atmospheric pollutants, Environmental protection, 2018, 46(24):51-57. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bollen J.C., Van der Zwaan B,, et al, Local air polluting and global climate change: a combined cost-benefit analysis[J], Resource and Energy Economics, 2009, 31(3: 161-181. [Google Scholar]
  29. Petter Tollerfsen et al, Air pollution policies in Europe: efficiency gains from integrating climate effects with damage costs to health and crops[J], Environmental science and policy, 2009, 12(7: 870-881. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nathan Rive, Climate policy in Western Europe and avoided costs of air pollution control [J], Economic Modelling, 2010, 27(1: 103-115. [Google Scholar]
  31. Peter Rafaj, Wolfgang Schopp, Peter Russ et al, Co-benefits of post-2012 global GHG-mitigation policies[J], Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, 18(6: 801-824. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chae Y,, Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area [J], Environmental Science and Policy, 2010, 13(3): 205:216. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ram M, Shrestha, Shreekar Pradhan, Co-benefits of CO2 emission reduction in a developing country[J], Energy Policy, 2010, 38(5: 2586-2597. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tao Hu, Chunxiu Tian, and Liping Li, Influence of co-benefit on policy in china [J], Environmental Protection, 2004(9): 56-58. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liping Li, Guomei Zhou, and Haoyu Ji, Study of co-benefits assessment of pollution reduction: A case study in Panzhihua [J], China Population Resources and Environment, 2010, S2: 91-95. [Google Scholar]
  36. Changhong Chen, and Bingyan Wang, Local air pollutant emission reduction and co-benefit of China energy policy: Shanghai case study [J], Shanghai Environmental Sciences, 2003(10): 682-689. [Google Scholar]
  37. K. He, Y. Lei, X. Pan et al. , Co-benefits from energy policies in China[J], Energy, 2010, 35(11: 4265-4272. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yuanbo Xie, and Wei Li, Synergistic emission reduction of chief air pollutants and greenhouse gases based on scenario simulations of energy consumptions in Beijing [J], Environmental Science, 2013, 34(5: 2057-2064. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xianqiang Mao, An Zeng, Tao Hu, et al. , Study of coordinate control effect assessment of technological measures for emissions reduction [J], China Population Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(12):1-7. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.