EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 197 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 197 (2020) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 197, 2020
75th National ATI Congress – #7 Clean Energy for all (ATI 2020)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 13
Section Sustainable Mobility
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019705005
Published online 22 October 2020
  1. IMO, 2017b. URL http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Air-Pollution.aspx [Google Scholar]
  2. Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 74th session, 13-17 May 2019 http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/MEPC/Pages/MEPC-74th-session.aspx [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Barsali, R. Giglioli, P. Pelacchi, D. Poli. Hybrid energy systems for static applications. In: 2016 IEEE AEIT international annual conference – sustainable development in the mediterranean area, Capri, Italy; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Ceraolo, M. Funaioli, G. Lutzemberger, M. Pasquali, D. Poli, L. Sani, Electrical storage for the enhancement of energy and cost efficiency of urban railroad systems, Civil-Comp. Proc. 104 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. M.U. Mutarraf, Y. Terriche; K.A.K. Niazi; J.C. Vasquez; J.M. Guerrero, Energy Storage Systems for Shipboard Microgrids—A Review. Energies 2018, 11, 3492 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Curt, Marine transportation of LNG, presentation at the Intertanko conference March 29, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. A.B. Smith, Gas fuelled ships: fundamentals, benefits classification & operational issues. In: Proceedings of the first gas fuelled ships conference, Hamburg, Germany 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Schinas, M. Butler Feasibility and commercial considerations of LNG-fueled ships. Ocean Engineering Volume 122, 1 August 2016, Pages 84-96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G.A. Livanos, G. Theotokatos., D.N. Pagonis, Techno-economic investigation of alternative propulsion plants for ferries and roro ships. Energy Conversion Management 79, 640–651. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Pasini, A. Baccioli, L. Ferrari, U. Desideri. Potential energy recovery from LNG regasification in LNG-fueled ships. E3S Web of Conferences, 113, p. 02011. 2019. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Zahedi, L. Norum, K. Ludvigsen. Optimized efficiency of all-electric ships by dc hybrid power systems. Journal of Power Sources, 255, pp. 341-354. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Tronstad, H. Astrand, G. Haugom e L. Langfeldt, “Study on the use of fuel cells in shipping. DNV-GL. Study commissioned by European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA),” 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pathways to sustainable shipping American Bureau of Shipping [Google Scholar]
  14. U. Desideri, R. Giglioli, G. Lutzemberger, G. Pasini and D. Poli, “Auxiliary Power Units for pleasure boats,” 2017 6th International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP), Santa Margherita Ligure, 2017, pp. 650-655 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ballard Power System, Scheda tecnica cella a combustibile FCvelocity-9ssl. URL https://www.ballard.com/docs/default-source/motive-modules-documents/material-handling/fcvelocity-9ssl.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  16. B. D. James e D. A. DeSantis, “Manufacturing Cost and Installed Price Analysis of Stationary Fuel Cell Systems,” Strateg. Anal., pp. 1–143, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. L. Dicks e D. A. Rand, “Fuel cell systems explained,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. IMO, “Guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained energy efficiency design index for new ships,” 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Sun et al., “Criteria Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Production in U.S. Steam Methane Reforming Facilities,” Environ. Sci. Technol., pp. 7103–7113, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. R. Walker, “Green Marine: An environmental program to establish sustainability in marine transportation,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., pp. 199–207, 2016. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Aneke e M. Wang, “Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review,” Appl. Energy, pp. 350–377, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. Proton Motor.URL http://www.hydrogendays.cz/2016/admin/scripts/source/presentations. [Google Scholar]
  23. MJE Alam, TK Saha. Cycle-life degradation assessment of Battery Energy Storage Systems caused by solar PV variability. 2016 IEEE Power Energy Soc Gen Meet 2016:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741532. [Google Scholar]
  24. G.F. Frate, P.P. Carro, L. Ferrari, U. Desideri. Techno-economic sizing of a battery energy storage coupled to a wind farm: An Italian case study. Energy Procedia, vol. 148, Elsevier; 2018, p. 447–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. F. A. de Bruijin, G. Janssen (2019). PEM Fuel Cell Materials: Costs, Performance, and Durability. In Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production (Issue June 2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Tsiropoulos, D. Tarvydas, e N. Lebedeva, “Li-ion batteries for mobility and stationary storage applications,” JCR science for policy report, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. BloombergNEF. URL https://about.bnef.com/behind-scenes-take-lithium-ion-batteryprices/. [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Mongird et al., “Energy storage technology and cost characterization report,” Pacific Northwest Natl. Lab., pp. 1–120, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Jafarzadeh, “LNG-fuelled fishing vessels: a systems engineering approach,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  30. The Math Works, Inc. MATLAB, 1994-2019. URL mathworks.com/products/matlab. [Google Scholar]
  31. C-L Hwang, Y-J Lai, T-Y Liu. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput Oper Res 1993;20:889–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.