Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 198, 2020
2020 10th Chinese Geosynthetics Conference & International Symposium on Civil Engineering and Geosynthetics (ISCEG 2020)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 7
Section Geosynthetics Applied Design Theory and Method
Published online 26 October 2020
  1. Keawsawasvong S, Ukritchon B. (2017) Undrained limiting pressure behind soil gaps in contiguous pile walls. Computers and Geotechnics, 83, 2017, pp. 152-158. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li C, Tang H, Hu X, et al. (2013) Numerical modelling study of the load sharing law of anti-sliding piles based on the soil arching effect for Erliban landslide, China. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 17(6): 1251-1262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Terzaghi K. (1936) Stress distribution in dry and in saturated sand above a yielding trap-door. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Soil Mech., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1, 307-311. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liang RY, Yamin M. (2010) Three-dimensional finite element study of arching behavior in slope drilled shafts system. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 34(11), 1157-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Şahin, A. (2011). Mathematical models and solution algorithms for computational design of RC piles under structural effects. Applied Mathematical Modeling 35(7), 3611-3638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yamin M. (2007). Landslide stabilization using a single row of rock-socketed drilled shafts and analysis of laterally loaded drilled shafts using shaft deflection data. PhD Thesis, The University of Akron, Akron, USA. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou DP, Xiao SG, Xia X. (2004) Discussion on rational spacing between adjacent anti-slide piles in some cutting slope projects[J]. Chinese Joural of Geotechinal, 26(1): 132-135. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang LW, Huang RQ, Jiang ZX. (2006) Analysis of soil arching effect between adjacent piles and their spacing in cohesive soils. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 27(3): 445-450. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen G, Zou L, Wang Q, et al. (2020) Pile-Spacing Calculation of Anti-Slide Pile Based on Soil Arching Effect. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020(6269):1-6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang CH, Chen YB, Lin LX. (2001) Soil arch mechanical character and suitable space between one another anti-sliding pile. Journal of Mountain science, 19(6): 556-559. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao MH, Liao BB, Liu SS. (2010) Calculation of anti-slide piles spacing based on soil arching effect. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 31(4): 1211-1216. [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng XH, Jian WX. (2014) Study on model calculating spacing of anti-slide piles based on friction arch. Subgrade Engineering, 3: 31-36. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li C, Tang H, Hu X, et al. (2013) Numerical modelling study of the load sharing law of anti-sliding piles based on the soil arching effect for Erliban landslide, China. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(6):1251-1262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu J, Li C, Liu Q, et al. (2017) Optimal isosceles trapezoid cross section of laterally loaded piles based on friction soil arching. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 21(7):2655-2664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Qiu ZY, Han TC, Dou HQ. (2016) Analysis of spacing between anti-slide piles considering soil arch on lateral sides and back. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 50(3):559-565. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao MH, Peng WZ, Yang CW, et al. (2019) Study on Spacing of Anti-slide Piles Considering Combined Soil Arching Effect on Lateral Side and Back. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 36(3):87-94. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang H, Chen J, Ma H, et al. (2019) A New Method to Determine a Reasonable Pile Spacing of Stabilizing Piles and Earth Pressure on Sheet Piles. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 12(1):37-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.