EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 202 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 202 (2020) 04003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020
The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Modelling and Computer Application for Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020204003
Published online 10 November 2020
  1. S. Shanov and K. Kostov, in edited by J. W. LaMoreaux, 1st ed. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2015)., p. 131 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Nicolas, Principles of Rock Deformation, 1st ed. (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1987) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Aimaiti, F. Yamazaki, W. Liu, and A. Kasimu, Appl. Sci. 7 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. C. B. Amos, P. Audet, W. C. Hammond, R. Bürgmann, I. A. Johanson, and G. Blewitt, Nature 509, 483 (2014) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Serpelloni, F. Pintori, A. Gualandi, E. Scoccimarro, A. Cavaliere, L. Anderlini, M. E. Belardinelli, and M. Todesco, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 4413 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. F. G. Bourrouilh-Le Jan, Sediment. Geol. 118, 3 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Klimchouk, A. N. Palmer, J. De Waele, A. S. Auler, and P. Audra, Hypogene Karst Regions and Caves of the World (Spinger, Tuscaloosa, 2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. A. Pambudi, A. Damayanti, and K. Marko, in Padjajaran Earth Dialogues, Int. Symp. Geophys. Issues (IOP Publishing, Bandung, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Fibriantika and R. I. Alhaqq, Meteorol. Dan Geofis. 19, 49 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. H. H. Muhammad Najib Habibie, Sri Noviati, Meteorol. Dan Geofis. 19, 1 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Samrin, I. Irwana, Trismidianto, and N. Hasanah, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 303, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, Data Bencana Indonesia 2017 (Pusat Data, Informasi, dan Humas Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, Jakarta, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Hazards, V. Andreychouk, P. S. Hazards, D. Karst, and I. Karst, 2, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Ford and P. Williams, Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Shi, Y. Tang, Z. Lu, J. W. Kim, and J. Peng, Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk 10, 1125 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Gao, E. C. Alexander, and R. J. Barnes, Environ. Geol. 47, 1083 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Maître, in Process. Synth. Aperture Radar Images, edited by H. Maitre, 1st ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2010), pp. 279–299 [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Bellone, P. Dabove, A. M. Manzino, and C. Taglioretti, Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk 7, 458 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Kaftan and A. Melnikov, in World Multidiciplinary Earth Sci. Symp., edited by M. Drusa, I. Yilmaz, M. Marschalko, I. Torok, O. Karaca, and A.M. Ferrero (IOP Publishing, Prague, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Osmanoğlu, F. Sunar, S. Wdowinski, and E. Cabral-Cano, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 115, 90 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Fárová, J. Jelének, V. Kopačková-Strnadová, and P. Kycl, Remote Sens. 11, 1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Tomaszewski, Geographic Information Systems ( GIS ); A Tool for Disaster Management (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. De Waele, F. Gutiérrez, M. Parise, and L. Plan, Geomorphology 134, 1 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Mulyana, M. B. R. Prayoga, A. Yananto, S. Wirahma, E. Aldrian, B. Harsoyo, T. H. Seto, and Y. Sunarya, MATEC Web Conf. 229, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. R. W. Van Bemmelen, Geol. Indones. Volume IA, 637 (1949) [Google Scholar]
  26. S. B. Kusumayudha, J. Setiawan, A. N. Ciptahening, and P. D. Septianta, J. Geol. Resour. Eng. 3, 1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Samodra, S. Gafoer, and S. Tjokrosapoetro, Geological Map of the Pacitan Quadrangle (Bandung, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  28. Surono, B. Toha, and I. Sudarno, Geological Map of the Surakarta-Giritontro Quadrangles (Bandung, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Haryono and M. Day, J. Cave Karst Stud. 66, 62 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  30. R. A. Pambudi, A. Damayanti, and K. Marko, in E3S Web Conf. (EDP Sciences, Semarang, 2018), pp. 1–7 [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Potin, B. Rosich, N. Miranda, and P. Grimont, Procedia Comput. Sci. 100, 1297 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. P. M. Boncori, Remote Sens. 8, 1 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  33. X. Gao, Y. Liu, T. Li, and D. Wu, Remote Sens. 9, 741 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. R. F. Hanssen, Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publihers, New York, 2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sarmap, SARscape Help Manual (Sarmap, Prague, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  36. Exelis VIS, Getting Started with SARscape 5.4 (Sarmap, Tokyo, n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  37. Sarmap, SARscape’s Basic Module Tutorial (Sarmap, Prague, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  38. Sarmap, 1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  39. J. M. Wempen and M. K. McCarter, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 27, 159 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  40. S. Takeuchi and S. Yamada, in Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IEEE, Toronto, 2004), pp. 2379–2381 [Google Scholar]
  41. Z. Du, L. Ge, X. Li, and A. Hay-Man Ng, Remote Sens. 8, 1 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  42. Sarmap, Sarscape Module (Sarmap, Prague, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  43. M. J. Day, in Nat. Anthropog. Hazards Karst Areas Recognition, Anal. Mitig., edited by M. Parisse and G. John, 1st ed. (The Geological Society, London, 2007), pp. 172–184 [Google Scholar]
  44. V. Tolmachev and M. Leonenko, in Karst Manag., edited by P. E. van Beynen, 1st ed. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 141–158 [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Ustun, E. Tusat, and S. Yalvac, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10, 1151 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. B. Hu, J. Chen, and X. Zhang, Sensors 19, 1 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.