Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020
The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
Article Number 06024
Number of page(s) 10
Section Green Infrastructure and Resilience
Published online 10 November 2020
  1. X. Ge, F. Xu, and Y. Li, Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Recent progress and perspectives, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 205, pp. 239–249, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Haryanto, F. Marotin, S. Triyono, and U. Hasanudin, Developing A Family-Size Biogas-Fueled Electricity Generating System, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111-118, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. BPS, Luas Panen dan Produksi Padi di Jawa Tengah 2018, no. 61. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Kainthola, A. S. Kalamdhad, and V. V. Goud, A review on enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by different enhancement techniques, Process Biochem., vol. 84, no. January, pp. 81–90, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. H. H. A. Matin and Hadiyanto, Biogas Production from Rice Husk Waste by using Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SSAD) Method, E3S Web Conf., vol. 31, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. Avicenna, M. Mel, S. I. Ihsan, and R. H. Setyobudi, Process Improvement of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cow Dung and Corn Husk, Procedia Chem., vol. 14, pp. 91–100, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.-F. Huang and S.-L. Lo, Utilization of rice hull and straw. AACCI. Published by Elsevier Inc. in cooperation with AACC International, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. B. lin Dai, X. jing Guo, D. hai Yuan, and J. ming Xu, Comparison of Different Pretreatments of Rice Straw Substrate to Improve Biogas Production, Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1503–1512, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Kumari and R. Singh, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 90, no. March, pp. 877–891, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. S. Lim, Z. Abdul Manan, S. R. Wan Alwi, and H. Hashim, A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3084–3094, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. N. I. Siddique and Z. A. Wahid, Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: A review, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 359–371, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. I. A. Fotidis, T. F. V. C. Laranjeiro, and I. Angelidaki, Alternative co-digestion scenarios for efficient fixed-dome reactor biomethanation processes, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 127, pp. 610–617, Jul. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Wang, G. Yang, Y. Feng, G. Ren, and X. Han, Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 120, pp. 78–83, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. H. Patil, M. A. L. AntonyRaj, B. B. Shankar, M. K. Shetty, and B. P. Pradeep Kumar, Anaerobic co-digestion of Water Hyacinth and Sheep Waste, Energy Procedia, vol. 52, pp. 572–578, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Cestonaro et al., The anaerobic co-digestion of sheep bedding and ≥50% cattle manure increases biogas production and improves biofertilizer quality, Waste Manag., vol. 46, pp. 612–618, (2015) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Tasnim, S. A. Iqbal, and A. R. Chowdhury, Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and Water Hyacinth, Renew. Energy, vol. 109, pp. 434–439, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Yao, S. Chen, and G. K. Kafle, Importance of ‘weak-base’ poplar wastes to process performance and methane yield in solid-state anaerobic digestion, J. Environ. Manage., vol. 193, pp. 423–429, (2017) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. C. Chan, R. A. De Toledo, H. In Iu, and H. Shim, Co-digestion of food waste and domestic wastewater - Effect of copper supplementation on biogas production, Energy Procedia, vol. 153, pp. 237–241, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Jabeen, Zeshan, S. Yousaf, M. R. Haider, and R. N. Malik, High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice husk at different organic loading rates, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., vol. 102, pp. 149–153, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Zhang, L. Luo, W. Li, X. Wang, Y.Sun, Y. Sun, W. Gong, Optimization of mixing ratio of ammoniated rice straw and food waste co-digestion and impact of trace element supplementation on biogas production, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 745–753, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. S. Mulyawan, D.W. Aghnia, E. Rianawati, E. Damanhuri, M. Handjani, T. Padmi, B.C.L. Fui, M. Acda, P. Unrean, The Study of Rice Husk as Co-Digestion Together with Cow Dung is Biogas Production of Anaerobic Digester, E3S Web Conf., vol. 73, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Asiyanthi Tabran, A. Abdul Nasser, and Nurhayati, Effect of Bio-activator Addition and Stirring on Biogas Production from Rice Husks and Cow Dung, E3S Web Conf., vol. 73, pp. 6–10, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Wahyudi, T. B. Achmad Kurnani, and J. Clancy, Biogas Production in Dairy Farming in Indonesia: A Challenge for Sustainability, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 219-226, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. E. T. Iyagba, I. A. Mangibo, and Y. S. Mohammad, The study of cow dung as co-substrate with rice husk in biogas production, Sci. Res. Essays, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 861–866, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Jijai, S. Muleng, L. Noynoo, and C. Siripatana, Kinetic model of biogas production from co-digestion of Thai rice noodle wastewater with rice husk and different type of manure with ash supplement, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 463, no. 1, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. A. K. Kumar and S. Sharma, Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review, Bioresour. Bioprocess., vol. 4, no. 1, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. W. D. Nugraha, Syafrudin, V. N. Kusumastuti, H. H. A. Matin, and Budiyono, Optimization of biogas production in Indonesian region by liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD) method from rice husk using response surface methodology (RSM), IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 845, p. 012042, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Mothe and V. R. Polisetty, Review on anaerobic digestion of rice straw for biogas production, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., Apr. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  29. E. R. Abaide, M. V. Tres, G. L. Zabot, and M. A. Mazutti, Reasons for processing of rice coproducts: Reality and expectations, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 120, no. March 2018, pp. 240–256, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Pathak and R. Wassmann, Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: I. Generation of technical coefficients, Agric. Syst., vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 807–825, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra, Z. Liu, and M. Lund, The impact of biogas technology adoption for farm households – Empirical evidence from mixed crop and livestock farming systems in Indonesia, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 74, no. November, pp. 1371–1378, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. I. Nygaard, F. Dembelé, I. Daou, A. Mariko, F. Kamissoko, N. Coulibaly, R.L. Borgstrøm, T.B. Bruun, Lignocellulosic residues for production of electricity, biogas or second generation biofuel: A case study of technical and sustainable potential of rice straw in Mali, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 61, pp. 202–212, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.