Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020
The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
Article Number 06023
Number of page(s) 8
Section Green Infrastructure and Resilience
Published online 10 November 2020
  1. P. Marrone, F. Orsini, F. Asdrubali, and C. Guattari, “Environmental performance of universities: Proposal for implementing campus urban morphology as an evaluation parameter in Green Metric,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 42, no. July, pp. 226–239 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. G. B. Gulwadi, E. D. Mishchenko, G. Hallowell, S. Alves, and M. Kennedy, “The restorative potential of a university campus: Objective greenness and student perceptions in Turkey and the United States,” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 187, no. February, pp. 36–46 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. V. Corazza, P. Di Mascio, and L. Moretti, “Managing sidewalk pavement maintenance: A case study to increase pedestrian safety,” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (English Ed., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 203–214 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Murwadi and B. Dewancker, “Study of quassessment model for campus pedestrian ways, case study: Sidewalk of the University of Lampung,” Sustain., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1–16, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, and M. Zaly Shah, “A pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting walking facilities on campus streets,” Land use policy, vol. 38, pp. 175–193 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. Ö. Göçer, K. Göçer, B. Özcan, M. Bakovic, and M. F. Kıraç, “Pedestrian tracking in outdoor spaces of a suburban university campus for the investigation of occupancy patterns,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 45, no. November 2018, pp. 131–142 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Shamsuddin, N. R. A. Hassan, and S. F. I. Bilyamin, “Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 50, no. July, pp. 167–178 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Leal Filho, C. Shiel, A. do Paço, and L. Brandli, Putting sustainable development in practice: Campus greening as a tool for institutional sustainability efforts. Elsevier Ltd., (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Ramakreshnan, N. Aghamohammadi, S. C. Fong, and N. M. Sulaiman, “Motivations and built environment factors associated with campus walkability in the tropical settings,” vol. 741, p. 140353 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. H. Pradana, J. Ernawati, and I. Martiningrum, “Walkability Jalur Pedestrian by Design di Area Kampus Universitas Brawijaya Malang,” (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Ridhosari and A. Rahman, “Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: Toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 246, p. 119172 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Soni and N. Soni, “Benefits of pedestrianization and warrants to pedestrianize an area,” Land use policy, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 139–150, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Rafiemanzelat, M. I. Emadi, and A. J. Kamali, “City sustainability: the influence of walkability on built environments,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 24, pp. 97–104 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Maizlish, N. J. Linesch, and J. Woodcock, “Health and greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of ambitious expansion of cycling, walking, and transit in California,” J. Transp. Heal., vol. 6, no. April, pp. 490–500 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Nakamura, “The spatial relationship between pedestrian flows and street characteristics around multiple destinations,” IATSS Res., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 156–163 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. D’Orso and M. Migliore, “A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 82, no. July 2019, p. 102555 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. C. Addanki and H. Venkataraman, “Greening the economy: A review of urban sustainability measures for developing new cities,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 32, pp. 1–8, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Olitsky, Y. Lerman, and E. Avineri, “Analysis of Stated PReferences for Accessible Services and Commerce in a Walkable Distance from Home,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 27, pp. 1001–1008 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. General Policy Diponegoro University 2015-2039, No.7/2016 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.