EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 202 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 202 (2020) 13004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020
The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
Article Number 13004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Industrial and Health Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020213004
Published online 10 November 2020
  1. S. Buhmann (Kirchhoff), C. Becker, H. R. Duerr, M. Reiser, and A. Baur-Melnyk, Detection of osseous metastases of the spine: Comparison of high resolution multi-detector-CT with MRI, Eur. J. Radiol., 69, 567–573 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Hartwig, G. Giovannetti, N. Vanello, M. Lombardi, L. Landini, and S. Simi, Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review., Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 6, 1778–98 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. K. Ganiyusufoglu, L. Onat, O. Karatoprak, M. Enercan, and A. Hamzaoglu, Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in stress fractures of the lumbar spine, Clin. Radiol., 65, 902–907 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Jacob, Pattern of spine degenerative disease among patients referred for lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es salaam, Tanzania March-September-2010., Accessed: Jan. 03, 2019. [Online] (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Henry, R. I. Riesenburger, J. Kryzanski, A. Jea, and S. W. Hwang, A retrospective comparison of CT and MRI in detecting pediatric cervical spine injury, Child’s Nerv. Syst., 29, 1333–1338 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. M. B. Lange, M. L. Nielsen, J. D. Andersen, H. J. Lilholt, M. Vyberg, and L. J. Petersen, Diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods for the diagnosis of skeletal malignancies: A retrospective analysis against a pathology-proven reference, Eur. J. Radiol., 85, 61–67 (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Rao, A. Mishra, Y. Pimpalwar, R. Sahdev, and N. Yadu, Incorporation of Whole Spine Screening in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Low Back Pain: A Valuable Addition, Asian Spine J., 11, 700 (2017). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Suthar, R. Patel, C. Mehta, and N. Patel, MRI evaluation of lumbar disc degenerative disease., J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 9, TC04-9 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Ngnitewe Massa and F. B. Mesfin, Herniation, Disc. StatPearls Publishing (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. D. F. Fardon, A. L. Williams, E. J. Dohring, F. R. Murtagh, S. L. Gabriel Rothman, and G. K. Sze, Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology., Spine J., 14, 2525–45 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Elliott, T. Flynn, A. Al-Najjar, J. Press, B. Nguyen, and J. T. Noteboom, The Pearls and Pitfalls of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Spine, J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther., 41, 848–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. T. Bushberg, J. A. Seibert, E. M. Leidholdt, and J. M. Boone, The essential physics of medical imaging (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Budrys, V. Veikutis, S. Lukosevicius, R. Gleizniene, E. Monastyreckiene, and I. Kulakiene, Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging: how it can really affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis?, J. Vibroengineering, 20, 1202–1213 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Lavdas et al., Elimination of motion, pulsatile flow and cross-talk artifacts using blade sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 31, 882–890 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Saba, Image principles, neck, and the brain (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Westbrook and J. (Writer on magnetic resonance imaging) Talbot, MRI in practice (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. S.-Y. Lee et al., A study on a method to reduce the effect of the cross-talk artifact in a simultaneous, multiple-slice, plane, oblique MRI scan, J. Korean Phys. Soc., 61, 807–814 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Westbrook, Handbook of MRI technique (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. N. C. Prabawati, S. Masrochah, and S. Mulyati, Analisis TSE Factor Terhadap Signal to Noise Ratio dan Contrast to Noise Ratio pada Pembobotan T2 Turbo Spin Echo Potongan Axial MRI Brain, J. Imejing Diagnostik, 3, 271 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Tanjung Aji Prastowo, W. Setiabudi, and dan Choirul Anam, Korelasi Nilai Time Repetition (TT) Dan Time Echo (TE) Terhadap Signal To Noise Ratio (SNR) Pada Citra MRI, Bad. Pen. Jur. Fis. Uni. Dip. Berkala Fisika, 16, 103-110 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.