EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 205 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 205 (2020) 04013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 04013
Number of page(s) 7
Section Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Properties of Geomaterials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020504013
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. H. Sone, M.D. Zoback, Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir rocks — Part 1: Static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy, Geophysics 78, D381-D392 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Sone, M.D. Zoback, Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir rocks — Part 2: Ductile creep, brittle strength, and their relation to the elastic modulus, Geophysics 78, D393-D402 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Kumar, C.H. Sondergeld, C.S. Rai, Nano to Macro Mechanical Characterization of Shale, SPE Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhb., SPE-159804-MS (2012) [Google Scholar]
  4. A.C. Aplin, J.H.S. Macquaker, Mudstone diversity: Origin and implications for source, seal, and reservoir properties in petroleum systems, AAPG Bull. 95, 2031-2059 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Rybacki et al., What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks? – Part I: Strength and Young’s modulus, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 135, 702-722 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Abousleiman et al., GeoMechanics Field Characterization of the Two Prolific U.S. Mid-West Gas Plays with Advanced Wire-Line Logging Tools, SPE Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhb., SPE-124428-MS (2009) [Google Scholar]
  7. F.J. Ulm, Y. Abousleiman, The nanogranular nature of shale, Acta Geotech. 1, 77-88 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Bobko, F.J. Ulm, The nano-mechanical morphology of shale, Mech. Mater. 40, 318-337 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. J.C. Zeszotarski et al., Imaging and mechanical property measurements of kerogen via nanoindentation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 68, 4113-4119 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Ahmadov et al., Confocal laser scanning and atomic-force microscopy in estimation of elastic properties of the organic-rich Bazhenov Formation, TLE 28, 18-23 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Zargari et al., Organic maturity, elastic properties, and textural characteristics of self resourcing reservoirs, Geophysics 78, D223-D235 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T.F.T. Rexer et al., High-Pressure Methane Adsorption and Characterization of Pores in Posidonia Shales and Isolated Kerogens, Energy Fuels 28, 2886-2901 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. E.J. Mathia et al., Influence of Clay, Calcareous Microfossils, and Organic Matter on the Nature and Diagenetic Evolution of Pore Systems in Mudstones, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 149–174 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Mavko, T. Mukerji, J. Dvorkin, The Rock Physics Handbook (Cambridge University Press, 2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Vernik, J. Milovac, Rock physics of organic shales, TLE 30, 318-323 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. K.S. Okiongbo, A.C. Aplin, S.R. Larter, Changes in Type II kerogen Density as a Function of maturity: Evidence from the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, Energy Fuels 19, 1564-1583 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruker’s Application Note #128 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Vernik, A. Nur, Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of hydrocarbon source rocks, Geophysics 57, 727-735 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Yan, D. Han, Measurement of elastic properties of kerogen, 83rd SEG Ann. Meet., 2778-2782 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Emmanuel et al., Impact of thermal maturation on nano-scale elastic properties of organic matter in sales, Mar. Petrol. Geol. 70, 175-184 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Eliyahu et al., Mechanical properties of organic matter in shales mapped at the nanometer scale, Mar. Petrol. Geol. 59, 294-304 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Zaoui, Continuum Micromechanics: Survey, J. Eng. Mech. 128, 808-816 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Mori, K. Tanaka, Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions, Acta Metall. 21, 571-574 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Hill, A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 13, 213-222 (1965) [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Abedi, M. Slim, F.J. Ulm, Nanomechanics of organic-rich shales: the role of thermal maturity and organic matter content on texture, Acta Geotech. 11. 775-787 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Goodarzi et al., Predicting the elastic response of organic-rich shale using nanoscale measurements and homogenisation methods, Geophys. Prospect. 65, 1597-1614 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. J.A. Ortega, F.J. Ulm, Y. Abousleiman, The effect of the nanogranular nature of shale on their poroelastic behaviour, Acta Geotech. 2, 155-182 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  28. B.E. Hornby, L. Schwartz, J. Hudson, Anisotropic effective‐medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales, Geophysics 59, 1570-1583 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. V. Dubey et al., Multiscale Poromechanical Modeling of Shales Incorporating Microcracks, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 52, 5099-5121 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  30. Z. Wang, M. Wang, M.E. Cates, Effective elastic properties of solid clays, Geophysics 66, 428–440 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Goodarzi, M. Rouainia, A.C. Aplin, Numerical evaluation of mean-field homogenisation methods for predicting shale elastic response, Comput. Geosci. 20, 1109-1122 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  32. J.A. Ortega, F.J. Ulm, Y. Abousleiman, The effect of particle shape and grain-scale properties of shale: A micromechanics approach, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. 34, 1124-1156 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Delafargue, F.J. Ulm, Explicit approximations of the indentation modulus of elastically orthotropic solids for conical indenters, Int. J. Solids Struct. 41, 7351-7360 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Herrmann et al., Deformation Experiments on Bowland and Posidonia Shale—Part I: Strength and Young’s Modulus at Ambient and In Situ pc–T Conditions, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51, 3645-3666 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.