Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 12004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Minisymposium: Low Carbon Geotechnical Engineering (organized by Alessandro Tarantino, Enrique Romero, and Alessio Ferrari)
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. Patra, C.R., Das, B.M., Atalar, C.: Bearing capacity of embedded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext. Geomembranes. 23, 454–462 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrawes, K.Z., McGown, A., Wilson-Fahmy, R.F., Mashhour, M.M.: The finite element method of analysis applied to soil-geotextile systems. In: Proc. of Second lnt. Conf. of Geotextiles. pp. 695–700. , Las Vegas, USA (1972) [Google Scholar]
  3. Khing, K.H., Das, B.M., Puri, V.K., Yen, S.C., Cook, E..: Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotext. Geomembranes. 13, 199–206 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Latha, G.M., Somwanshi, A., Latha, M.G., Somwanshi, A.: Bearing capacity of square footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext. Geomembranes. 27, 281–294 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.02.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sitharam, T.G., Sireesh, S.: Model studies of embedded circular footing on geogridreinforced sand beds. Proc. ICE - Gr. Improv. 8, 69–75 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Das, S.K., Samadhiya, N.K.: Numerical modelling of prestressed geogrid reinforced soil for adjacent square footing. In: Geo-Chicago 2016. pp. 827–835 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. Gray, D.H., Al-Refeai, T.: Brhavior of fabric versus fiber reinforced sand. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE. 113, 541–542 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  8. Das, B.M.: Shallow foundation on sand underlain by soft clay with geotextile interface. Geosynth. Soil Improv. 1, 203–214 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayyar, T.S.R., Krishnasamy.N.R., Ravishankar, S., Parashar, S.P.: Bearing capacity of kaolinite clay reinforced with geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. pp. 11–14. , Bombay, India (1990) [Google Scholar]
  10. Love, J.P., Burd, H.J., Milligan, G.W.E., Houlsby, G.T.: Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on soft clay subgrade. Can. Geotech. J. 24, 611–622 (1987) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Madhav, M.R., Poorooshasb, H.B.: A new model for geosynthetic reinforced soil. Comput. Geotech. (1988). doi:10.1016/0266-352X(88)90070-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Guido, V.A., Biesiadecki, G.L., Sullivan, M.J.: Bearing capacity of a geotextilereinforced foundation. In: Proc. of 11th International Conference on SMFE. pp. 1777–1780. , San Francisco, USA (1985) [Google Scholar]
  13. Koerner, R.M.: Designing with geosynthetics. 6th Ed. 1, (2012). doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Broms, B.B.: Design of fabric reinforced retaining structures. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, DSCE Special Convention. pp. 282–304. , Pittsburg, USA (1972) [Google Scholar]
  15. Aboshi, H.: Soil improvement techniques in japan. In: Proc. of Seminar on Soil Improvement and Construction Techniques in Soft Ground. pp. 3–16. , Singapore (1984) [Google Scholar]
  16. Shukla, K., Chandra, S.: A Generalized Mechanical Model for Geosynthetic-Reinforced Foundation Soil. Geotext. Geomembranes. 13, 813–825 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shukla, S.K., Chandra, S.: The Effect of Prestressing on the Settlement Characteristics of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil. Geotext. Geomembranes. 13, 531–543 (1994). doi:10.1016/0266-1144(94)90063-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lovisa, J., Shukla, S.K., Sivakugan, N.: Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing. Geotext. Geomembranes. 28, 23–32 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shivashankar, R., Jayaraj, J.: Behaviour of Prestressed Geosynthetic Reinforced Granular Beds Overlying Weak Soil. Indian Geotech. J. 44, 26–38 (2014). doi:10.1007/s40098-013-0070-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lackner, C., Bergado, D.T., Semprich, S.: Prestressed reinforced soil by geosynthetics concept and experimental investigations. Geotext. Geomembranes. 37, 109–123 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huesker Synthetic: A 143 motorway Western relief road Halle/Germany. , Gescher, Germany (2004) [Google Scholar]
  22. Chew, S.H., Tan, S.A., Leong, K.W.: Performance of geotextile stabilized unpaved road systems subjected to pretensioning. In: Geo-Frontiers Congress 2005. pp. 1–14 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  23. Brinkgreve, R.B.J., Engin, E., Swolf, W.M.: Plaxis 3d 2013. Plaxis bv. 2013 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. Aswathy, M.H., Jayamohan, J., Shivasankar, R.: Behaviour of Prestressed Geosynthetic Reinforced Granular Bed Overlying Weak Soil. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. , Roorkee.India (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. Aswathy, M.S., Shivashankar, R., Jayaraj, J.: Behaviour of Prestressed Geosynthetic Reinforced Granular Beds Overlying Weak Soil. In: Indian Geotechnical Conference. pp. 1–8. , Roorkee.India (2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharma, R., Chen, Q., Abu-Farsakh, M., Yoon, S.: Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotext. Geomembranes. 27, 63–72 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.07.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shivashankar, R., Jayaraj, J.: Effects of prestressing the reinforcement on the behavior of reinforced granular beds overlying weak soil. Geotext. Geomembranes. 42, 69–75 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.08.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.