Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
Article Number 18013
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Education
Published online 04 December 2020
  1. Á. Török, J. Tóth, J. M. Balogh, Push or Pull? The nature of innovation process in the Hungarian food SMEs.Journal of Innovation [amp] Knowledge, 4, 234-239 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. M. LeeSilvana, TrimiInnovation for creating a smart future. Journal of Innovation [amp] Knowledge, 3, 1-8 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Philipson, Sources of innovation: Consequences for knowledge production and transfer.Journal of Innovation [amp] Knowledge, 5, 50-58 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. A. Cancino, J. M. Merigó, F. C. Coronado, A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research. Journal of Innovation [amp] Knowledge, 2, 106-124 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. L. Leal-Rodríguez, G. Albort-Morant, Promoting innovative experiential learning practices to improve academic performance: Empirical evidence from a Spanish Business School. Journal of Innovation [amp] Knowledge, 4, 97-103 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Baumann, K. Mantay, A. Swanger, G. Saganski, S. Stepke. Education and Innovation Management: A Contradiction? How to Manage Educational Projects if Innovation is Crucial for Success and Innovation Management is Mostly Unknown.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 243-251 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Seufert, The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24, 116-129 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Bardach, R. M. Klassen, A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 30, 100312 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Cozma, The Challenge of Teaching English to Adult Learners in Today’s World.Procedia– Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1209-1214 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Polkowski, R. Jadeja, N. Dutta, Peer Learning in Technical Education and it’s Worthiness: some facts based on implementation. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 247-252 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. van Leeuwen, J. Janssen, A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71-89 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Bulle, Student’s activity and development: Disentangling secondary issues from the heart of the matter, Educational Research Review, 27, 56-70 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Pushkareva, M. Pushkarev, Experience economy in the system of culture and education. E3S Web of Conferences, 135, 04070 (2019) doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913504070 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Rus, N. Medrea, Developing Communicational Abilities in Professional Environments Through English Language Teaching. Procedia-economics and Finance, 3, 1161-1164 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Murtonen, H. Gruber, E. Lehtinen, The return of behaviourist epistemology: A review of learning outcomes studies. Educational Research Review, 22, 114-128 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.