Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2020
The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Cities and Communities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021101016
Published online 25 November 2020
  1. T. Adharsyah, Jangan Salah Pilih Kuliah, Ini Pekerjaan yang Tren di Era 4.0, CNBC Indonesia (2019) https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190321182918-4-62193/jangan-salah-pilih-kuliah-ini-pekerjaan-yang-tren-di-era-40 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. K. Parker and U. K. Bindl, Proactivity at work: A big picture perspective on a construct that matters, in Proactivity at Work: Making Things Happen in Organizations, U. K. Parker, S. K. Bindl, 1–20 (Routledge, New York, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Zennouche, J. Zhang, and W. B. Wang, Factors influencing innovation at individual, group and organisational levels: A content analysis, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Change Manag., 7, 23–42 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2014.065052 [Google Scholar]
  4. X. Zhong and Z. Liu, Studies on creativity enhancement of contemporary college students, 3rd Int. Conf. Sci. Soc. Res. ICSSR (2014) https://doi.org/10.2991/icssr14.2014.148 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Etikariena, Analisis efek mediasi identitas organisasi dan kesiapan karyawan untuk berinovasi pada hubungan antara memori organisasi dengan perilaku kerja inovatif, Universitas Indonesia (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. H. M. Roffeei, F. D. Yusop, and Y. Kamarulzaman, Determinants of innovation culture amongst higher education students., Tojet Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 17, 37–50 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Martín, K. Potočnik, and A. B. Fras, Determinants of students’ innovation in higher education, Stud. High. Educ., 42, 1229–1243 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1087993 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Chen and Y. Yin, Research on mechanism of innovation climate in college on college student’s innovative behavior the mediating effects of intrinsic incentives, 3rd Int. Conf. Arts, Des. Contemp. Educ. ICADCE, 144, 914–917 (2017) https://doi.org/10.2991/icadce-17.2017.225 [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Janssen, Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers, J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 76, 347–364 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647210 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. C. Shiu, S. Y. Lin, and H. O. Chien, The relationship between learning motivation and innovative behavior in the university students: From the perspective of creative self-efficacy, Int. J. Arts Sci., 5, 33–38 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. U. Nations, About Major Groups and other stakeholders. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/aboutmajorgroups.html. [Google Scholar]
  12. U. Nations, The 17 Goals: History. https://sdgs.un.org/goals [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Kemahasiswaan and D. J. P. dan Kemahasiswaan, Pedoman Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa (PKM) Tahun 2020 (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Winarso, Pekan Ilmiah Mahasiswa Nasional (PIMNAS) (2020) http://kemahasiswaandikti.blogspot.com/2015/11/pekan-ilmiah-mahasiswa-nasional-pimnas.html [Google Scholar]
  15. M. M. Hammond, N. L. Neff, J. L. Farr, A. R. Schwall, and X. Zhao, Predictors of individual-level innovation at Work: A meta-analysis, Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts, 5, 90–105 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Giebels, R. S. M. de Reuver, S. Rispens, and E. G. Ufkes, The critical roles of task conflict and job autonomy in the relationship between personalities and innovative employee behavior, J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 52, 320–341 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316648774 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Fuller and L. E. Marler, Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature, J. Vocat. Behav., 75, 329–345 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. I. F. N. Khasanah and F. Himam, Kepemimpinan transformasional kepribadian proaktif dan desain kerja sebagai prediktor perilaku kerja inovatif, Gadjah Mada J. Psychol., 4, 143 (2018) https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.46361 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. J. Pons, J. Ramos, and A. Ramos, Antecedent variables of innovation behaviors in organizations: Differences between men and women, Rev. Eur. Psychol. Appl., 66, 117–126 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2016.04.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Windiarsih and A. Etikariena, Hubungan antara kepribadian proaktif dan perilaku inovatif di BUMN X, J. Psikogenes., 5, 123–134 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Helmy and M. P. Pratama, Pengaruh proactive personality dan pemberdayaan psikologis terhadap perilaku inovatif melalui creative self efficacy, J. Pro Bisnis, 11, 14–21 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Li, Y. Liu, L. Liu, and Z. Wang, Proactive personality and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of affective states and creative self-efficacy in teachers, Curr. Psychol., 36, 697–706 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-0169457-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Yulianti and F. P. Arifien, Innovative behavior on millennials: Antecedent proactive personality and task conflict with moderating job autonomy, J. Manaj. dan Pemasar. Jasa, 12, 177 (2019) https://doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v12i2.4358 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. E. Purba and J. Paundra, Core self-evaluations and innovative behavior among microentrepreneurs: The mediating effect of proactive personality, Psychol. Res. Urban Soc., 1, 55 (2018) https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v1i1.30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. T. S. Bateman and J. M. Crant, The proactive component of organizational behavior, J. Organ. Behav., 14, 103–118 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. M. Crant and K. Jiang, Proactive personality: A twenty-year review, in Proactivity at Work: Making Things Happen in Organizations, S. Parker and U. Bindl, 193–225 (Routledge, New York, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Wu and W. Li, Individual differences in proactivity: a developmental perspective, in Proactivity at Work: Making Things Happen in Organizations, S. K. Parker and U. K. Bindl, 226–257 (Routledge, New York, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  28. O. Janssen, Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour, J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 73, 287–302 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. G. Scott and R. A. Bruce, Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Acad. Manag. J., 37, 580–607 (1994) https://doi.org/10.5465/256701 [Google Scholar]
  30. R. M. Kanter, Three tiers for innovation research, Communic. Res., 15, 509–523 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022005001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. N. Kostromina and N. V. Grishina, The dynamic personality: ‘Continuity amid change, ’ Psychol. Russ. State Art, 12, 34–45 (2019) https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0203 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Bandura, A social cognitive theory of personality, Handb. Personal. Theory Res., 2, 154–196 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L [Google Scholar]
  33. W. D. Li, D. Fay, M. Frese, P. D. Harms, and X. Y. Gao, Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics: A latent change score approach, J. Appl. Psychol., 99, 948–965 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036169 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. E. G. Kirby, S. L. Kirby, and M. A. Lewis, A study of the effectiveness of training proactive thinking, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 32, 1538–1549 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01451.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. G. Messmann and R. H. Mulder, Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed, Vocat. Learn., 4, 63–84 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S. E. Seibert, M. L. Kraimer, and J. M. Crant, What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success, Pers. Psychol., 54, 845–874 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. R. E. Maunder, M. Cunliffe, J. Galvin, S. Mjali, and J. Rogers, Listening to student voices: Student researchers exploring undergraduate experiences of university transition, High. Educ., 66, 139–152 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9595- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Etikariena and H. Muluk, Correlation between organizational memory and innovative work behavior, Makara Hum. Behav. Stud. Asia, 18, 77 (2014) https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3463 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Nabilah, Hubungan antara kepribadian proaktif dan efikasi diri dalam keputusan karir pada mahasiswa, Universitas Indonesia (2015) [Google Scholar]
  40. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, J. Appl. Psychol., 88, 879–903 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.88.5.879 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. A. W. Meade and S. B. Craig, Identifying careless responses in survey data, Psychol. Methods, 17, 437–455 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085 [Google Scholar]
  42. R. M. Kaplan and Saccuzzo, Psychological testing Principles, Application, and Issues, 7th ed. (Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  43. J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3nd ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 1994) [Google Scholar]
  44. K. Józsa and G. A. Morgan, Reversed items in likert scales: Filtering out invalid responders, J. Psychol. Educ. Res., 25, 7–25 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1988) [Google Scholar]
  46. J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS, 6th ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead, 2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.