Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2020
The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 10
Section Sustainable Cities and Communities
Published online 25 November 2020
  1. U. A. Agarwal, Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement, Person Rev 43, 1, 41-73, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Janssen, Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour, J. Occ. Organ. Psy. 73, 3, 287–302, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Martín, L Potočnik. A.B Fras, A, Determinants of students’ innovation in Higher Education, Study in Higher Edu 42, 7, 1229-1243, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. G. Scott. R. A. Bruce, Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Acad. Manag. J. 37, 3, 580–607, (1994) [Google Scholar]
  5. I Getz. A.G. Robinson, Innovate or Die: is that a fact? Creativ. and Innov. Manag. 12, 3, 130-136, (2003). Blackwell Publishing Ltd [Google Scholar]
  6.,poin%20ke%20posisi%2064%2C6. Diunduh Agustus 2020 [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Chen. Y. Yin, Research on mechanism of innovation climate in college on college student’s innovative behavior the mediating effects of intrinsic incentives, 3rd Int. Conf. Arts, Des. Contemp. Educ. ICADCE, 144, 914–917, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Messmann. R. H. Mulder, Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed, Vocat. Learn., 4, 1, 63–84, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. X. huan Zhong. Z. liang Liu, Studies on creativity enhancement of contemporary college students, 3rd Int. Conf. Sci. Soc. Res. ICSSR, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Etikariena, Analisis efek mediasi identitas keorganisasian dan kesiapan karyawan untuk berinovasi pada hubungan antara ingatan keorganisasian dan perilaku kerja inovatif, Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia, (2017), Unpublished. Retrive from: [Google Scholar]
  11. N.A. Kwang, Why Asians are more less creative than westerners, (2001), Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  12. B.A. Hennessey and T.M. Amabile, Creativity”, Ann Rev of Psy, 61, 569-598, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. H. M. Roffeei, F. D. Yusop. Y. Kamarulzaman, Determinants of innovation culture amongst higher education students., Tojet Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 17, 1, 37–50, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Azevedoa. M.J Shane, A new training program in developing cultural intelligence can also improve innovative work behavior and resilience: A longitudinal pilot study of graduate students and professional employees,. The Intl J. of Manag. Edu, 17, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. Reddy, Staff Training: Importance, Benefits, Advantages & Disadvantages, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  16. U. Nations, 4 Quality Education.[Online]. Available: [Accessed: 15-Jul-2020] [Google Scholar]
  17. U. Nations, The 17 Goals: History.[Online]. Available: [Accessed: 15-Jul-2020] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. A. Zimmerman, Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between psychological and individual conceptions, American J. of Comm. Psy., 18, 169-177, (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M.A. Zimmerman, Psychological Empowerment: Issues and Illustrations, American. J. of Comm. Psy., 23, 5. (1995) [Google Scholar]
  20. A.B. Frymier, G.M. Shulman, and M. Houser, The development of a learner empowerment measure, Comm. Edu, 45, 3, 181-199, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Batool, G. Noureen, and Z. Ayuob, Relating Learner Empowerment with Learner Self-Regulation Learning in Higher Education, Rev of Eco and Dev. Stud, 5, 4, 755-766, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. M. Kirk, R.K. Lewis, K. Brown, B. Karibo, and E. Park, The power of student empowerment: Measuring classroom predictors and individual indicators, The J. of Edu. Res, 109, 6, 589-595, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Schmidt, C. Baumgarth, Empowerment from a “student as customer” perspective: Literature review and development of a framework in the context of higher education, Res. Gate, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Ghani. K. Jusoff, Stimulating lecturers’ innovative behaviour in Malaysian Polytechnics, Acad Lead: The Online J, 7, 4, [29], (2009a) [Google Scholar]
  25. N. A. A, Ghani, T. A., Hussin. K, Jussoff, The impact of psychological empowerment on lecturers’ innovative behaviour in Malaysian private higher education institutions. Canad. Soc. Sci, 5, 4, 54–62. (2009b) [Google Scholar]
  26. A. A. A, Rahman, ., S. A. Panatik. R. A. Alias, The influence of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior among academia in Malaysian research universities,. Intl. Proc. of Econ. Dev. and Res., 78, 108. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  27. G. M Spreitzer,. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation, Acad. of Manag. J, 38, 5, 1442-1465, (1995) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Tierney. S.M. Farmer, Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time, J. of Appl. Psy., 96, 2, 277–293. (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Tierney. S.M. Farmer, Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance, The Acad. of Manag. J., 45, 1137–1148. (2002) [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Yuan. R.W. Woodman, Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations, Acad. of Manag. J, 53, 2, 323–342. (2010) . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M.L.A. Hsu, S, T. Hou. H. L. Fan, Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: optimism as a moderator, The J. of Creative Behav., 45, 258–272. (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. T. Slåtten, Determinants and effects of employee’s creative self-efficacy on innovative activities, Intl, J. of Qual. and Serv. Sci, 6, 326-347 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Liu. . Y. Pan. X. Luo. L. Wang. W, Pang, Active procrastination and creative ideation: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy, Person. and Indiv. Diff. 119. 227–229. (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Mittal, R.L. Dhar, Transformational leadership and employee creativity, Manag. Decis. 53 5, 894–910. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. L.K. Jenaa, P. Bhattacharyyab, S. Pradhan, Am I empowered through meaningful work? The moderating role of perceived flexibility in connecting meaningful work and psychological empowerment, IIMB Management Review, 31, 298–308. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. N. K. Jaiswal, R.L. Dhar, Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative selfefficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study, Intl J. of Hospitality Manag. 51, 30–41. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Wang, J.C. Rode, K Shi, Z. Luo, W. Chen, A workgroup climate perspective on the relationships among transformational leadership, workgroup diversity, and employee creativity, Group Org. Manag. 38, 3, 334–360. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Y. Kaijun. P.I. Sholihah, A Comparative Study of The Indonesia and Chinese Educative Systems Concerning The Dominant Incentives to Entrepreneurial Spirit (Desire for A New Venturing) of Bussines School Students, J. of Innov. and Entrep., 4, 1, 1-16 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. D. Kemahasiswaan, D. J. P. dan Kemahasiswaan, and Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Pedoman Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa (PKM) Tahun 2020 : Buku 1 – Panduan Umum [Google Scholar]
  40. F. J, Gravetter L. A. B. Forzano, Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  41. F.J. Gravetter, L.B. Wallnau,. Statistics for behavioral sciences, (9th Ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  42. J. Southall, H. Wason, B. Avery, Non-traditional, commuter students and their transition to Higher Education a synthesis of recent literature to enhance understanding of their needs, Stud. Enga. and Exp. J., 5, 1, 1–15. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  43. C. Trautwein, E. Bosse, The first year in higher education—critical requirements from the student perspective Hig. Edu. 73, 3, 371–387. (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. A Etikariena. H Muluk, The correlation between organizational memory and innovative work behavior, Makara Hubs-Asia, 18, 2, 77-88 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. P. M Podsakoff. S. B MacKenzie. J. Y Lee. N. P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, J. of App. Psy., 88, 5, 879. (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. T. J. B. Kline, L. M. Sulsky, S. D Rever-Moriyama, Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection The J. of Psy., 134, 4, 401–421. (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. A. J Berinsky, F.M Michele, M. W Sances, Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys, American J. of Polit. Sci. 58, 3, 739–753. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. A.F. Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach, 2nd edition. The Guilford Press. New York. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  49. A. Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Singh, A. Sarkar, The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior, J. of Personl Psy. 11, 3, 127–137. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  51. K. A. Davis, C.T. Amelink, Exploring differences in perceived innovative thinking skills between first-year and upperclassmen engineers, In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Edu.Conf. (FIE) 1-7 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  52. J. Knol, R. Van Linge, Innovative Behaviour: The Effect of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Nurses. J. of Advan, Nursing, 65, 2, 59-70 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  53. A. Etikariena, Perbedaan perilaku kerja inovatif berdasarkan karakteristik individu karyawan, J. Psiko., 17, 2, 107–118. (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.