Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2020
2020 International Conference on Energy Big Data and Low-carbon Development Management (EBLDM 2020)
Article Number 02051
Number of page(s) 5
Section Machine Learning and Energy Industry Structure Forecast Analysis
Published online 07 December 2020
  1. C.C. Chen, X. Chen, S. Huang. Chinese Guanxi : An Integrative Review and New Directions for Future Research[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2013, 9(1): 167-207. [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo Y, Huang Y., & Wang S.L. Guanxi and Organizational Performance: a Meta-analysis[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2012, 8(1): 139-172. [Google Scholar]
  3. Du J, & Zhou C. Does Guanxi Matter in the Foreign Expansion of Chinese Manufacturing Firms? the Mediator Role of Linking and Leveraging[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2019, 36(5): 1-25. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang M, & Hartley J.L. Guanxi, It Systems, and Innovation Capability: the Moderating Role of Proactiveness[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 90: 75-86. [Google Scholar]
  5. Garud R, & Karnøe P. Bricolage Versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(2): 277-300. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yli-renko H., Autio E., & Sapienza H. Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-based Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 587-613. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gu F, Hung K., & Tse D. When Does Guanxi Matter? Issues of Capitalization and Its Dark Sides[J]. Journal of Marketing American Marketing Association Issn, 2008, 72: 12-28. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yeniyurt S, Henke JW, & Yalcinkaya G. A Longitudinal Analysis of Supplier Involvement in Buyers’ New Product Development: Working Relations, Inter-dependence, Co-innovation, and Performance Outcomes[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2014, 42(3): 291-308. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ranjan KR, & Read S. Value Co-creation: Concept and Measurement[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(3): 290-315. [Google Scholar]
  10. [10] Moran P., & Ghoshal S. Value Creation By Firms[J]. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1996, 1996(1): 41-45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Weiler M, & Hinz O. Without Each Other, We Have Nothing: a State-of-the-art Analysis on How to Operationalize Social Capital[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2018 (483): 1-33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang HH, & Chuang S.S. Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge Sharing: Participant Involvement as a Moderator[J]. Information & Management, 2011, 48(1): 9-18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Y., D. J. X., K. M.. A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams[J]. International Journal of Information, 2013, 33(5): 780-790. [Google Scholar]
  14. Stewart KJ, & Gosain S. The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams[J]. Mis Quarterly, 2006, 30(2): 291-314. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wasko ML, & Faraj S. ”it Is What One Does”: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2000, 9(2): 155-173. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohli AK, & Jaworski B.J. Market Orientation: the Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(2): 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu L, Liu H., & Zhang J. Bricolage Effects on New-product Development Speed and Creativity: the Moderating Role of Technological Turbulence[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 70: 127-135. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Cankurtaran, F. Langerak, A. Griffin. Consequences of New Product Development Speed: A Meta‐Analysis[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(3): 465-486. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.