Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 217, 2020
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Environmental Risks and Safety in Mechanical Engineering” (ERSME-2020)
Article Number 07012
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Economics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021707012
Published online 14 December 2020
  1. D. Demitru, Procedia Manufacturing 46, 932-940 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Ansyori, Procedia Computer Science 135, 43-51 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Azevedo, Information Systems 54, 235-262 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. S.R. Mirsalari, Evaluation and Program Planning 83 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Löffler, Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 32, 47-55 (2018) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. M.J. Hutt, Journal of Dairy Science 76, 2069-2079 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  7. A.R. Burden, Anesthesiology Clinics (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Anjaria, Expert Systems with Applications 157, 493-497 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. S.R. Oktari, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Mottaeva, As. Mottaeva, EMMFT 2019, AISC 1258, 506-517 (2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57450-5_44 [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Gulenko, Teamwork management (REPAL, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Gulenko, Humanitarian socionics (Black squirrel, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Jankowski, The 16 Personality Types in a Nutshell (LOGOS MEDIA, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Pietrak, Cognitive Systems Research 47, 1-11 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Gulenko, Types of people and business. How 16 types of personality determine your success at work (AST, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Ganebnykh, O. Lezhnina, T. Zhilkina, E3S Web of conferences 164, 10033 (2020) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chechevichkin, V.N., Vatin, N.I. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2014. 50(6). Pp. 67-74. DOI:10.5862/MCE.50.7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kovačič, B., Kamnik, R., Pustovgar, A., Vatin, N. Procedia Engineering. 2016. 165. Pp. 918-925. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.801 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ognjenovic, S., Donceva, R., Vatin, N. Procedia Engineering. 2015. 117(1). Pp. 544-550. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.210 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ognjenovic, S., Donceva, R., Vatin, N. Procedia Engineering. 2015. 117(1). Pp. 551-558. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.212 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ognjenovic, S., Ristov, R., Vatin, N. Procedia Engineering. 2015. 117(1). Pp. 568-573. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.215 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ognjenović, S., Zafirovski, Z., Vatin, N. Procedia Engineering. 2015. 117(1). Pp. 574-579. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.216 [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Kozlov, M. Pushkarev, V. Mokhna E3S Web of Conferences 135, 01052 (2019) DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/201913501052 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.