Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2021
2020 2nd International Conference on Power, Energy and Electrical Engineering (PEEE 2020)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 5
Section Power Engineering and Power Electronic Technology
Published online 25 January 2021
  1. Deblina Sarkar, Wei Liu, Xuejun Xie, et al. MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor for Next-Generation LabelFree Biosensors. Acs Nano, 2014, 8(4):3992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Godfrey Akpakwu, Bruno Silva, Gerhard P. Hancke, et al. A Survey on 5G Networks for the Internet of Things: Communication Technologies and Challenges. IEEE Access, 2017, 5(12):3619-3647. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kawaura H, Sakamoto T. Baba T. Observation of source-to-drain direct tunneling current in 8 nm gate electrically variable shallow junction metal–oxide– semiconductor field-effect transistors. Applied Physics Letters, 2000, 76(25):3810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Desai S B, Madhvapathy S R, Sachid A B, et al. MoS2 transistors with 1-nanometer gate lengths. ence, 2016, 354(6308):99-102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu L, Lu Y. Guo J. On Monolayer, Field-Effect Transistors at the Scaling Limit. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2013, 60(12):4133-4139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon Y, Ganapathi K. Salahuddin S. How good can monolayer MoS2‚ transistors be?. Nano Letters, 2011, 11(9):3768-3773. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng Zhang. On the Tunability of Short-Channel Effects in MoS2 Field-Effect Devices. Nano Letters, 2014, 15(1):301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bilu Liu, Yuqiang Ma, Anyi Zhang, et al. High Performance WSe2 Field-Effect Transistors via Controlled Formation of In-Plane Heterojunctions. Acs Nano, 2016, 10(5):51-53. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fathipour S, Hwang W S, Kosel T, et al. Exfoliated MoTe2 field-effect transistor. Device Research Conference. IEEE, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Park S J, Kwon O S, Lee S H, et al. Ultrasensitive Flexible Graphene Based Field-Effect Transistor (FET)-Type Bioelectronic Nose. Nano Letters, 2012, 12(10):5082-5090. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim S, Nah J, Jo I, et al. Realization Of A High Mobility Dual-gated Graphene Field-effect Transistor With Al_2o_3 Dielectric. Applied Physicsletters, 2009, 94(6):161-163. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ki F, Chen Y, Yin K, et al. Large bandgap of pressurized trilayer graphene, 2019, 116(19): 9186–9190. [Google Scholar]
  13. Monteverde U, et al. (2015) Under pressure: Control of strain, phonons and bandgap opening in rippled graphene. Carbon 91:266–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nemnes G A, Dragoman D. Dragoman M. Graphene bandgap induced by ferroelectric Pca21 HfO2 substrate: a first-principles study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Da Zhan, Jia Xu Yan, Zhen Hua Ni, et al. BandgapOpened Bilayer Graphene Approached by Asymmetrical Intercalation of Trilayer Graphene. Small, 2015, 11(9-10):1177–1182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Musso T, Kumar P V, Foster A S, et al. Graphene Oxide as a Promising Hole Injection Layer for MoS2-Based Electronic Devices. Acs nano, 2014, 8(11):11432-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matthew J Allen, Vincent C Tung, Richard B Kaner. Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene. Chemical Reviews, 2009, 110(1):132-145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Sevinçli, Topsakal M, Durgun E, et al. Electronic and magnetic properties of 3d transitionmetal atom adsorbed graphene and graphene nanoribbons[J]. Physical Review B, 2008, 77(19):3107-3109. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kundalwal S I, Meguid S A, Weng G J. Strain gradient polarization in graphene[J]. Carbon, 2017, 117(Complete):462-472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morales-Torres, Sergio, Pastrana-Martní ez, Luisa, Figueiredo, José. Design of graphene-based TiO photocatalysts-a review. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 2012, 19(9):3676-3687. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.