Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 233, 2021
2020 2nd International Academic Exchange Conference on Science and Technology Innovation (IAECST 2020)
Article Number 01130
Number of page(s) 6
Section NESEE2020-New Energy Science and Environmental Engineering
Published online 27 January 2021
  1. Berendonk T U, Manaia C M, Merlin C, et al. Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework [J]. Nature Reviews: Microbiology, 2015, 13(5):310-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo G, Li B, Li L G, et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Correlations with Microbial Community and Metal Resistance Genes in Full-Scale Biogas Reactors As Revealed by Metagenomic Analysis [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(7):4069-4080. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ji X, Shen Q, Liu F, et al. Antibiotic resistance gene abundances associated with antibiotics and heavy metals in animal manures and agricultural soils adjacent to feedlots in Shanghai; China [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 235-236:178-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Whitehead T R, Cotta M A Stored swine manure and swine faeces as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance genes [J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2013, 56(4):264-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marti R, Scott A, Tien Y C, et al. Impact of manure fertilization on the abundance of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and frequency of detection of antibiotic resistance genes in soil and on vegetables at harvest [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 79(18):5701-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kanger K, Guilford N G H, Lee H, et al. Antibiotic resistome and microbial community structure during anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, paper and cardboard [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2020, 96(2). [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang J, Ben W, Yang M, et al. Dissemination of veterinary antibiotics and corresponding resistance genes from a concentrated swine feedlot along the waste treatment paths [J]. Environment International, 2016, 92-93:317-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhao Q, Liu Y Is anaerobic digestion a reliable barrier for deactivation of pathogens in biosludge? [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 668:893-902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tian Z, Zhang Y, Yu B, et al. Changes of resistome, mobilome and potential hosts of antibiotic resistance genes during the transformation of anaerobic digestion from mesophilic to thermophilic [J]. Water Research, 2016, 98:261-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma Y, Wilson C A, Novak J T, et al. Effect of various sludge digestion conditions on sulfonamide, macrolide, and tetracycline resistance genes and class I integrons [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(18):7855-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lu T, Zhang J, Li P, et al. Enhancement of methane production and antibiotic resistance genes reduction by ferrous chloride during anaerobic digestion of swine manure [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 298:122519. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jang H M, Shin J, Choi S, et al. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) sludge [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 244(Pt 1):433-444. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Youngquist C P, Mitchell S M, Cogger C G Fate of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance during Digestion and Composting: A Review [J]. Journal of Environment Quality, 2016, 45(2):537-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang J, Lu T, Wang Z, et al. Effects of magnetite on anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Attention to methane production and fate of antibiotic resistance genes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 291:121847. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sui Q, Zhang J, Chen M, et al. Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in anaerobic digestion and land application of swine wastewater [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 213:751-759. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gurmessa B, Pedretti E F, Cocco S, et al. Manure anaerobic digestion effects and the role of pre- and post-treatments on veterinary antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes removal efficiency [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 721:137532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pu C, Liu H, Ding G, et al. Impact of direct application of biogas slurry and residue in fields: In situ analysis of antibiotic resistance genes from pig manure to fields [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 344:441-449. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao R, Feng J, Liu J, et al. Deciphering of microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge reactors under high selective pressure of different antibiotics [J]. Water Research, 2019, 151:388-402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ju F, Li B, Ma L, et al. Antibiotic resistance genes and human bacterial pathogens: Co-occurrence, removal, and enrichment in municipal sewage sludge digesters [J]. Water Research, 2016, 91:1-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duan M, Gu J, Wang X, et al. Factors that affect the occurrence and distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in soils from livestock and poultry farms [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environment Safety, 2019, 180:114-122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin H, Chapman S J, Freitag T E, et al. Fate of tetracycline and sulfonamide resistance genes in a grassland soil amended with different organic fertilizers [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environment Safety, 2019, 170:39-46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Scott A, Tien Y C, Drury C F, et al. Enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes in soil receiving composts derived from swine manure, yard wastes, or food wastes, and evidence for multiyear persistence of swine Clostridium spp [J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2018, 64(3):201-208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.