Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 234, 2021
The International Conference on Innovation, Modern Applied Science & Environmental Studies (ICIES2020)
Article Number 00083
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 02 February 2021
  1. High Commission for Water and Forests and the Fight Against Desertification. Forest and water in a context of climate change, watershed management in Morocco, an unavoidable territorial approach, Morocco: pp. 8 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. PAP/CAR: Regional Activity Centre for the Priority Action Programme in collaboration with FAO. Guidelines for mapping and measuring water erosion processes in Mediterranean coastal areas, Split, Croatie: pp. 2 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  3. J.G. Arnold, P.M. Allen, Automated methods for estimating baseflow and groundwater recharge from streamflow records. J. American Water Resources. Assoc. 35(2): pp. 411-424 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  4. High Commission for Water and Forests and the Fight against Desertification. Ourika Forest Management Study: Preliminary study: pp. 54 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  5. E.A. Elalaoui, M.E. Saidi, Simulation and spatialization of flood risk in an anthropized valley. The case of Ourika (High Atlas, Morocco): pp. 212-214 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Modeste, A. Khattabi, N. Mhamdi, H. Zhang, Mapping Water Erosion Risks Using the Revised Universal Equation of Soil Losses, Remote Sensing and GIS in the Ourika Watershed (High Atlas, Morocco): pp. 280-281 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. P.W. Gassman, M.R. Reyes, C.H. Green, J.G. Arnold, The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future directions. Transactions of the ASABE 50(4): pp. 1211-1250 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Renaud, J. Poulenard, Implementation of the SWAT agri-environmental model on the Mercube watershed (Haute Savoie): Towards a modelling of phosphorus transfers. pp. 74. DESS report Jean Monnet-ENISE University (2004) [Google Scholar]
  9. S.L. Neitsh, J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, K.W King, Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation-version 2005. Soil and water research laboratory, agricultural research service. Temple: US Department of Agriculture (2005) [Google Scholar]
  10. K.C. Abbaspour, M. Vejdani, S. Haghighat, SWAT-CUP Calibration and uncertainty programs for SWAT. In MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand: pp. 1603-1609 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Nachtergaele, H. van Velthuizen, L. Verelst, N. Batjes, K. Dijkshoorn, V. van Engelen, G. Fischer, A. Jones, L. Montanarella, M. Petri, S. Prieler, X. Shi, E. Teixeira, D. Wiberg, The harmonized world soil database. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. D.N. Moriasi, J.G. Arnold, M.W. Van Liew, R.L. Bingner, R.D. Harmel, T.L. Veith, Model evaluation guideline for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulation. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3): pp. 885-900 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Ferrant, F. Oehler, P. Durand, L. Ruiz, J. Salmon-Monviola, E. Justes, P. Dugast, A. Probst, J.L. Probst, J.M. Sanchez-Perez, Understanding nitrogen transfer dynamics in a small agricultural catchment: Comparison of a distributed (TNT2) and a semi distributed (SWAT) modeling approaches. Journal of Hydrology 406(1-2): pp. 1-15 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. J.G. Arnold, D.N. Moriasi, P.W. Gassman, K.C. Abbaspour, M.J. White, R. Srinivasan, C. Santhi, R.D. Harmel, A. van Griensven, M.W. Van Liew, N. Kannan, M.K. Jha,SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE: pp. 1491-1508 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Oeurng, S. Sauvage, J.M. Sánchez-Pérez, Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 401(3-4): pp. 145-153 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Kumar, V. Merwade, Impact of watershed subdivision and soil data resolution on swat model calibration and parameter uncertainty. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45 (5): pp. 1179-1196 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  17. D.N. Moriasi, M.W. Gitau, N. Pai, P. Daggupati, Hydrologic and Water Quality Models: Performance Measures and Evaluation Criteria. Transactions of the ASABE, 58(6). pp. 1763 1785. doi:10.13031/trans.58.10715 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Ghanam, TS4 Management of Land. TS4.5 Desertification in Morocco - Which control strategy? 2nd FIG Regional Conference Marrakech, Morocco (2003) [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Lean, Down to earth. A simplified guide to the Convention to combat desertification. The Centre for our common future, Geneva. pp. 32 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Rojo Serrano, Programs of national agencies for mitigation of desertification in Spain. European Union Concerted Action on Mediterranean Desertification. King's College, London. pp. 31 (1996) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.