Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 08005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Natural Science, Natural Resources Management, Bio Technology, Microbiology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132808005
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. L. Wang, Q. Zhou, Y. Zheng, and S. Xu, “Composite structure and properties of the pitcher surface of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes and its influence on the insect attachment system,” Prog. Nat. Sci., vol. 19, no.12, pp. 1657-1664, (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.09.005. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Mansur, “LAJU PENYERAPAN CO2 PADA KANTONG SEMAR (Nepenthes gymnamphora Nees) DI TAMAN NASIONAL GUNUNG HALIMUN-SALAK, JAWA BARAT,” J. Teknol. Lingkung., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 59, (2016), doi: 10.29122/jtl.v13i1.1405. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mardhiana, Y. Parto, R. Hayati, and D. P. Priadi, “Karakteristik dan Kemelimpahan Nepenthes di Habitat Miskin Unsur Hara,” J. Lahan Suboptimal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50-56, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. S. J. Bhore, V. Komathi, and K. I. Kandasamy, “Diversity of endophytic bacteria in medicinally important Nepenthes species,” J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 431-434, (2013, doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.117022. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. K. Fanani, A. L. Abadi, and L. Q. Aini, “EKSPLORASI BAKTERI PATOGEN PADA BEBERAPA SPESIES TANAMAN KANTONG SEMAR (Nepenthes sp.),” J. Hama dan Penyakit Tanam., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 104-110, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Drancourt, C. Bollet, A. Carlioz, R. Martelin, J. P. Gayral, and D. Raoult, “16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates,” J. Clin. Microbiol., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3623-3630, (2000), doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.10.3623-3630.2000. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. B. S. C. Bibiana Wid, “Identifikasi dan Keragaman Genetik Bakteri Asam Laktat dari Tapai Singkong berdasarkan Sekuen Gen 16S rRNA,” J. Biota, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 46-52, (2018), doi: 10.24002/biota.v2i2.1656. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Srinivasan et al., “Use of 16S rRNA gene for identification of a broad range of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens,” PLoS One, vol.10, no. 2, pp. 1-22, (2015), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117617. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. E. Clarridge, “Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases,” Clin. Microbiol Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp 840-862, (2004), doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Z. DeSantis et al., “Greengenes, a chimera- checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 5069-5072, (2006), doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nurjanah, Zulhamsyah, and Kustiyariyah, “Kandungan mineral dan proksimat kerang darah (Anadara granosa) yang diambil dari Kabupaten Boalemo, Gorontalo,” Bul. Teknol. Has. Perikan., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 15-24, (2005), doi: https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v8i2.1012. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. de Oliveira Ribeiro, R. A. Caires, T. C. Mariguela, L. H. G. Pereira, R. Hanner, and C. Oliveira, “DNA barcodes identify marine fishes of Sao Paulo State, Brazil,” Mol. Ecol. Resour., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1012-1020, (2012), doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12007. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Meliah, A. W. Hardiyanti, N. Haida, G. A. Putri, and E. Q. Ainy, “Penapisan Bakteri Penghambat Fusarium yang Diisolasi dari Cairan Kantung Semar (Nepenthes sp.),” J. Ilmu Pertan. Indones., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 627-635, (2020), doi: 10.18343/jipi.25.4.627. [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0,” Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2725-2729, (2013), doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.