EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 328 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 328 (2021) 10013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 10013
Number of page(s) 4
Section Resilience Infrastucture and Society, Transportation System, Smart Structure and Construction, Sustainability Infrastructure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132810013
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. A. K. Salim, M. A. Darmawan, and H. Wibowo, “Analisa Perbandingan Biaya Perkerasan Kaku dan Perkerasan Lentur Pada Proyek Jalan Middle Ring Road Kota Makassar,” J. Tek. Sipil Macca, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Rizqurrachman, R. Djmaluddin, and S. A. Sasmita, “Pengaruh Beton Serat Yang Menggunakan Bentonit Terhadap Kekuatan Perkerasan Kaku,” J. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. K. Fauzi, E. Eswan, and S. Suratmi, “Perencanaan Perkerasan Kaku Dengan Beton Precast Sebagai Alternatif Percepatan Konstruksi Perkerasan Jalan,” Tek. Sipil dan Arsit., vol. 1, no.1, pp. 1–13, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Riduan, E. Sulandri, and Su. Sumiyatinnah, “Studi Kuat Tekan Dan Kuat Lentur Beton Pada Perkerasan Kaku Terhadap Variasi Saringan Agregat Kasar,” JeLAST, pp. 1–12, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Indrayani, A. Herius, A. Hasan, and A. Mirza, “The Effect of Addition on Pumice and Fiber on Compressive and Fluxural Strength Precast Lightweight Concrete,” Sci. Technol. Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Niken, “The Behaviour Of Coak Connection Model On The Beam Applied For Precast Concrete,” Din. Tek. Sipil, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Nuroji, B. H. Setiadji, and W. Aktorina, “Comparison of Precast and Conventional Concrete Rigid Pavements Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Media Komun. Tek. Sipil, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 212–219, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Gaus, I. Imran, C. Anwar, and L. Novianti, “Experimental Study of the Use of Pumice Sand in the Rigid Pavement,” EPI Int. J. Eng., vol. 2, no.1, pp. 61–66, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Gaus, M. A. Sultan, R. Hakim, and I. Anggreni, “Substitusi Parsial Batu Apung Sebagai Agregat Kasar Pada Campuran Beton,” J. Tek. Sipil Univ. Teuku Umar, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 11–19, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Sutowo, S. Kirono, and T. Susanto, “Analisa Kekuatan Material Pada Aplikasi Dowel Jalan Beton,” Sintek J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. A. Sultan, K. Kusnadi, and M. T. Yudasaputra, “Effect Of Pressure On Making Of Cemen Bricks from Pumice,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no.5, pp. 1084–1091, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. SNI 03-3449, Tata Cara Rencana Pembuatan Campuran Beton Ringan Dengan Agregat Ringan. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Ardan, “Kajian penggunaan batu apung dan styrofoam sebagai bahan pengganti agregat kasar pada perencanaan beton ringan,” Arbitek, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. A. Sultan, A. Gaus, R. Hakim, and I. Imran, “Review of The Flexural Strength of Lightweight Concrete Beam Using Pumice Stone as of Substitution,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 21, no. 85, pp. 154–159, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Gaus Imran, and C. Anwar, “Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Concrete Beams That Use Pumice as a Partial Substitution of Concrete Mixtures,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1569, no. 4, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Gaus, I. Imran, and C. Anwar, “The Effects of The Use of Pumice on Precasct Concrete Mixture For Highway Drainage,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 177–183, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Rochani, A. Prasetyo, and A. Kurniawan, “Pemanfaatan Batu Apung (Pumice) Lombok dan Bakteri (Baccillus Subtilis) Sebagai Agent Perbaikan Kerusakan Retakan Beton,” Maj. Geogr. Indones., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. SNI 03-2491, “Metode pengujian kuat tarik belah beton,” Badan Standar Nas. Indones., p. 14, 2002. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.