Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2021
3rd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2020)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 4
Section Environmental Protection and Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123701019
Published online 09 February 2021
  1. China Environmental Protection Industry Association. Technical Catalogue of Contaminated Sites Remediation (First batch) [A]. Beijing: Report on the Development of China’s Environmental Protection Industry (2014), 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. BAI Y H, ZHANG S J. Permeable reactive barrier as a remedy technology of contaminated groundwater [J]. Yunnan Environmental Science, 2005, 24(4) : 51-54. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu Jun, Lou Yuefeng, Li Jun. Method and characteristics of loading iron oxide on quartz sand surface[J]. Chemical progress, 2016, 35 (2) :624-628. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao Fang, Zhang Weimin, Guo Yadan, et al. Hydroxyapatite nano zero-valent iron removal of uranium (VI) in aqueous solution [J]. Chinese ceramics, 2015, 51 (8) :10-15. [Google Scholar]
  5. UESPA. A citizens guide to permeable reactive barriers[M]. Washington D. C. : US Environmental Protection Agency Press, 2001:1-2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zuo Simin, Jing Zhaoqian, Tao Mengni, et al. Study on the application of natural zeolite and modified zeolite in wastewater treatment [J] Application of chemical, 2019, 48(5):1136-1145. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zeng Yunzheng, Zhang Weimin, Wang Huidong, et al. Study on removal of Manganese from aqueous solution with quartz sand loaded hydroxyapatite [J] Water treatment technology, 2017, 43(5):72-79. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu Haiyu, Zhang Mingqing, Chen Yiyu. Removal of hexavalent chromium from water by organic attapulgite loaded nano zero valent iron [J] Environmental Science in China, 2019, 39(12) : 5079-5084. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu N, Ding F, Wang L, et al. Coupling of bio-PRB and enclosed in-well aeration system for remediation of nitrobenzene and aniline in groundwater [J] Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 2016, 23(19):9972-9983. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ministry of Environmental Protection, PRC. Technical Report on remediation of contaminated Sites [R]. Beijing: Ministry of Environmental Protection, PRC, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Xiaohui, Ge Fangzhou, Dong Yujing, et al. Research progress of permeable reactive wall in situ remediation of contaminated groundwater [J]. Industrial water and wastewater, 2015, 46 (3) :1-5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cun Junfang, Zheng Xilai, Lin Guoqing. Permeable reactive wall technology for groundwater organic pollution treatment [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2003, 14 (3). [Google Scholar]
  13. JEEN S W, GILLHAM R W, PRZEPIORA A. Predictions of longterm performance of granular iron permeable reactive barriers: fieldscale evaluation[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2011, 123 (1/2) : 50-64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Yan, Gu Xiaogang, Miu Zhouwei, et al. Review on the screening methods of groundwater remediation in contaminated sites [J]. China Municipal Engineering, 2018, 5 (10) :25-27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang Hong, Zhu Liangliang, Yuan Lingwei. Preparation and degradation of methylene blue from modified attapulgite loaded nano zero valent iron [J]. Sichuan chemical, 2020, 23 (1) :6-10. [Google Scholar]
  16. CHEN W, PAN L, CHEN L, et al. Dechlorination of hexachlorobenzene by nanozero-valent iron/ activated carbon composite: iron loading, kinetics and pathway[J]. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(87): 46689-46696. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun Y P, Li X Q, Zhang W X. A method for the preparation of stable dispersion of zero-valent iron nanoparticles[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical And Engineering Aspects, 2013, 308 (1-3):60-66. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jing Li, Mingjie Fan, Miao Li, et al. Cr(VI) removal from groundwater using double surfactant-modified nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): Effects of materials in different status[J]. Science of the Total Environment. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tian Lei. Study on the Removal of mixed pollution of chlorinated hydrocarbon and benzene Series from groundwater by PRB[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. HOU G, LIU F, LIU M, et al. Performance of a permeable reactive barrier for in situ removal of ammonium in groundwater[J]. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2014, 14(4): 585-592. [Google Scholar]
  21. LUDWIG R D, SMYTH D J, BLOWES D W, et al. Treatment of arsenic, heavy metals, and acidity using a mixed ZVI-compost PRB[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, 43(6) :1970-1976. [Google Scholar]
  22. VESELA L, NEMECEK J, SIGLOVA M, et al. The biofiltration permeable reactive barrier: practical experience from Synthesia [J]. International Biodeterioration&Biodegradation, 2006, 58(3/4): 224-230. [Google Scholar]
  23. O’HANNESIN S F, GILLHAM R W, VOGAN J L. TCE degradation in groundwater using zerovalent iron [R]. Washington DC: American Chemical Society Extended Abstract, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Division, 1995: 55-58. [Google Scholar]
  24. USCG. In situ permeable reactive barrier for treatment of contaminated groundwater at the US Coast Guard Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina[R]. Elizabeth City, NC: US Coast Guard Support Center, 1998. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.