Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 238, 2021
100RES 2020 – Applied Energy Symposium (ICAE), 100% RENEWABLE: Strategies, Technologies and Challenges for a Fossil Free Future
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Renewable Energies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123801011
Published online 16 February 2021
  1. DiPippo R.: Geothermal power plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact, 3rd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, Oxford, England, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  2. DiPippo R.: Geothermal power plants: Evolution and performance assessments, Geothermics, 53, (2015), 291-307. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fiaschi D., Manfrida G., Rogai E., Talluri L.: Exergoeconomic analysis and comparison between ORC and Kalina cycles to exploit low and medium-high temperature heat from two different geothermal sites, Energy Conversion and Management, 154, (2017), 503-516. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaya E., Zarrouk S.J., O’Sullivan M.J.: Reinjection in geothermal fields: A review of worldwide experience, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, (2011), 47-68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Diaz A.R., Kaya E., Zarrouk S.J., Reinjection in geothermal fields: A review of worldwide update, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, (2016), 105-162. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zarrouk S.J., Woodhurst B.C., Morris C.: Silica scaling in geothermal heat exchangers and its impact on pressure drop and performance: Wairakei binary plant, New Zealand, Geothermics, 51, (2014), 445-459. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldacci A., Mannari M., Sansone F.: Greening of Geothermal Power: An Innovative Technology for Abatement of Hydrogen Sulphide and Mercury Emission, Proceedings, World Geothermal Congress 2005, Antalya, Turkey, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. Sullivan J.L., Clark C.E., Han J., Wang M.: Life-Cycle Analysis Results of Geothermal Systems in Comparison of Other Power Systems, Report, Energy Systems Division of Argonne national laboratory, US Department of Energy, Chicago, US (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruscoli L., Fiaschi D., Manfrida G., Tempesti D.: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Flash Geothermal Power Plants – A Case Study, Sustainability, 7, (2015), 15262-15283. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shafaei M.J., Abedi J., Hassanzadeh H., Chen Z.: Reverse gas-lift technology for CO2 storage into deep saline aquifers, Energy, 45, (2012), 840-849. [Google Scholar]
  11. Klein S.A., Nellis G.F.: Mastering EES, f-Chart software, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. Colucci V., Fiaschi D., Leveni M., Manfrida G., Talluri L.: Thermodynamic model of geothermal resources for low-medium temperature energy conversion process optimization, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 76, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. Kotas, T., The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis, Elsevier, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bejan A., Tsatsaronis G., Moran M.J.: Thermal Design and Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  15. ISO (2006a). ISO 14040: Environmental management: Life-cycle assessment: Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, available at http://www.iso.org (last accessed on 12/07/2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO (2006b). ISO 14044: Environmental management: Life-cycle assessment: Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. available at http://www.iso.org (last accessed on 12/07/2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Noi C., Ciroth A., Srocka M.: OpenLCA 1.7, Comprehensive User Manual, GreenDelta GmbH, Berlin, Germany, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wernet G., Bauer C., Steubing B., Reinhard J., MorenoRuiz E., Weidema, B.: The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, (2016), 1218–1230. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huijbregts M.A.J., Steinmann Z.J.N., Elshout P.M.F., Stam G., Verones F., Vieira M.D.M., Hollander A., Zijp M., Van Zelm R., ReCiPe 2016, A harmonized life cycle assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level, Report, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  20. Ding Y., Liu C., Zhang C., Xu X., Li Q., Mao L.: Exergoenvironmental model of Organic Rankine Cycle system including the manufacture and leakage of working fluid, Energy, 145, (2018), 52–64. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meyer L, Tsatsaronis G, Buchgeister J, Schebek L. Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems. Energy, 34, (2009), 52–64, 75–89. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.