EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 238 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 238 (2021) 07003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 238, 2021
100RES 2020 – Applied Energy Symposium (ICAE), 100% RENEWABLE: Strategies, Technologies and Challenges for a Fossil Free Future
Article Number 07003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Social, Economic and Policy Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123807003
Published online 16 February 2021
  1. IEA, “Global EV Outlook 2019, ” Paris, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. RSE, “Auto elettrica e de-carbonizzazione: facciamo chiarezza, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Wolinetz, J. Axsen, J. Peters, and C. Crawford, “Simulating the value of electric-vehicle–grid integration using a behaviourally realistic model, ” Nat. Energy, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 132–139, 2018, DOI: 10.1038/s41560-017-0077-9. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Quirós-Tortós, L. F. Ochoa, and B. Lees, “A statistical analysis of EV charging behavior in the UK, ” in 2015 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LATAM), Oct. 2015, pp. 445–449, DOI: 10.1109/ISGTLA.2015.7381196. [Google Scholar]
  5. T&E, “Recharge EU, ” Brussels, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. R. Helmus, J. C. Spoelstra, N. Refa, M. Lees, and R. van den Hoed, “Assessment of public charging infrastructure push and pull rollout strategies: The case of the Netherlands, ” Energy Policy, Vol. 121, pp. 35–47, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.011. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Z. Lévay, Y. Drossinos, and C. Thiel, “The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership, ” Energy Policy, Vol. 105, pp. 524–533, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054. [Google Scholar]
  8. ARERA, “Documento per la consultazione 318/2019/R/eel, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. ARERA, “Delibera 23 dicembre 2015 654/2015/R/eel, ” Milan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. F. Bossmann, Tobias, Paul Barberi, “Effect of high shares of renewables on power systems, ” METIS Stud., 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. MISE and MATTM, “Strategia elettrica nazionale, ” Rome, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. MATTM, MISE, MIT, and RSE, “Elementi per una roadmap della mobilità sostenibile, ” Milan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Terna and Snam, “Documento di Descrizione degli Scenari, ” Rome, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ambrosetti and Enel, “E-mobility revolution, ” Rome. [Google Scholar]
  15. Energy & Strategy Group, “Smart Mobility Report 2019, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Plötz, S. Funke, and P. Jochem, “Real-world fuel economy and CO2 emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, ” Karlsruhe, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Sioshansi, R. Fagiani, and V. Marano, “Cost and emissions impacts of plug-in hybrid vehicles on the Ohio power system, ” Energy Policy, Vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 6703–6712, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.040. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Loisel, G. Pasaoglu, and C. Thiel, “Large-scale deployment of electric vehicles in Germany by 2030: An analysis of grid-to-vehicle and vehicle-togrid concepts, ” Energy Policy, Vol. 65, pp. 432–443, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.029. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Pareek, “Performance & Efficiency Improvement of Electric Vehicle Power Train, ” in NuGen Summit, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-282483. [Google Scholar]
  20. UnipolSai, “Osservatorio UnipolSai sulle abitudini di guida in Italia, ” Bologna, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Weiller, “Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle impacts on hourly electricity demand in the United States, ” Energy Policy, Vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3766–3778, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.005. [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Gnann, A.-L. Klingler, and M. Kühnbach, “The load shift potential of plug-in electric vehicles with different amounts of charging infrastructure, ” J. Power Sources, Vol. 390, pp. 20–29, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.029. [Google Scholar]
  23. T&E, “Roll-out of public EV charging infrastructure in the EU, ” Brussels, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Element Energy Limited, “Electric Vehicle Charging Behaviour Study, ” Cambridge, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. Northern Powergrid, “CLNR Customer Trials A guide to the load & generation profile datasets, ” Newcastle upon Tyne, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Z. Yi and D. Scoffield, “A Data-Driven Framework for Residential Electric Vehicle Charging Load Profile Generation, ” in 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Jun. 2018, pp. 519–524, DOI: 10.1109/ITEC.2018.8450228. [Google Scholar]
  27. “Google, ” 2020. https://www.google.com/ (accessed May 26, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  28. M. S. Islam and N. Mithulananthan, “Daily EV load profile of an EV charging station at business premises, ” in 2016 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Asia (ISGT-Asia), Nov. 2016, pp. 787–792, DOI: 10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2016.7796485. [Google Scholar]
  29. R. R. Desai, R. B. Chen, and W. Armington, “A Pattern Analysis of Daily Electric Vehicle Charging Profiles: Operational Efficiency and Environmental Impacts, ” J. Adv. Transp., Vol. 2018, p. 6930932, 2018, DOI: 10.1155/2018/6930932. [Google Scholar]
  30. ARERA, “Scheda tecnica Prezzi dei servizi di ricarica per veicoli elettrici e sistema tariffario dell’energia elettrica, ” Milan, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Torriti, “The Risk of Residential Peak Electricity Demand: A Comparison of Five European Countries, ” Energies, Vol. 10, no. 3, 2017, DOI: 10.3390/en10030385. [Google Scholar]
  32. ARERA, “Relazione annuale 2019, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. ARERA, “Deliberazione 9 aprile 2019 126/2019/R/eel, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Wolbertus, R. van den Hoed, and S. Maase, “Benchmarking Charging Infrastructure Utilization, ” World Electr. Veh. J., Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 754–771, Dec. 2016, DOI: 10.3390/wevj8040754. [Google Scholar]
  35. ARERA, “Andamento del prezzo dell’energia elettrica per il consumatore domestico tipo in maggior tutela, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. ARERA, “Prezzi finali dell’energia elettrica per i consumatori industriali UE e area Euro, ” Milan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. A. Alhazmi and M. M. A. Salama, “A Statistical Approach to Estimate the Correlation between Charging Station Availability and Plug – In Electric Vehicle Sales in Canada, ” in Proceedings of the 2015International Conference on Operations Excellence and Service Engineering, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Hardman et al., “A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure, ” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., Vol. 62, pp. 508–523, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002. [Google Scholar]
  39. G. Harrison and C. Thiel, “An exploratory policy analysis of electric vehicle sales competition and sensitivity to infrastructure in Europe, ” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, Vol. 114, pp. 165–178, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.007. [Google Scholar]
  40. C. Silva, P. Faria, and Z. Vale, “Rating the Participation in Demand Response Programs for a More Accurate Aggregated Schedule of Consumers after Enrolment Period, ” Electronics, Vol. 9, no. 2, p. 349, Feb. 2020, DOI: 10.3390/electronics9020349. [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Torstensson and F. Wallin, “Potential and Barriers for Demand Response at Household Customers, ” Energy Procedia, Vol. 75, pp. 1189–1196, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.570. [Google Scholar]
  42. BCG, “Who Will Drive Electric Cars to the Tipping Point?, ” Boston, 2020. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.