Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 241, 2021
2020 8th International Conference on Environment Pollution and Prevention (ICEPP 2020)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Wastewater Treatment and Water Pollution Evaluation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124101003 | |
| Published online | 10 March 2021 | |
- J. G. Arnold, D. N. Moriasi, P. W. Gassman et al., “SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation”, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1491–1508, (2012) [Google Scholar]
- M. W. van Liew, J. G. Arnold, and D. D. Bosch, “Problems and potential of autocalibrating a hydrologic model”, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1025–1040, (2005) [Google Scholar]
- Burgess C., Complete Valid analytical methods and procedures, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 32-43; (2000) [Google Scholar]
- Tang W., Fore A., Yueh S., Validating SMAP SSS with in situ measurements, Remote Sensing of Environment, Volume 200, Pages 326-340 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- http://www.european-accreditation.org-EA Guidelines of expression of uncertainty in quantitative testing, (2004) [Google Scholar]
- Andrew J., Measurement validation via expected uncertainty, Measurement, Volume 30, Issue 3, October (2001) [Google Scholar]
- * * * SR EN ISO/CEI 17025: 2018 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories [Google Scholar]
- Eurachem Guide – the Fitness of Purpose of Analytical Methods (Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics), ISBN: 978-91-87461-59-0, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- Defra/Environment Agency, “Protocols for minimum standards in modelling–flood warning management system phase 2a”, Report prepared for Defra/Environment Agency FCERM management R&D Programme, Tech. Rep. W5C-021/2areport. View at Google Scholar (2005) [Google Scholar]
- A. Lefebvre and A. P. Lyons, “Quantification of roughness for seabed characterization”, J. Coast. Res., Spec. Issue 57, 781-785, (2011) [Google Scholar]
- H. V. Gupta, K. J. Beven, and T. Wagener, “Model calibration and uncertainty estimation”, in Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, USA, (2005) [Google Scholar]
- L. Cea and J. R. French, “Bathymetric error estimation for the calibration and validation of estuarine hydrodynamic models”, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 100, pp. 124–132, (2012) [Google Scholar]
- N. Huybrechts, H. Smaoui, A. Ouahsine et al., “Prediction of the bed friction coefficient using either high resolution bathymetric data or granulometry samples”, 109, October (2013) [Google Scholar]
- N. G. Plant, K. T. Holland, and J. A. Puleo, “Analysis of the scale of errors in nearshore bathymetric data”, Marine Geology, vol. 191, no. 1-2, pp. 71–86, (2002) [Google Scholar]
- Toth L., Calamar A., Irimia A., Simion S., Simion A., Research on aquatic pollution level of Maleia river by simulation in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Environmental engineering and management journal 18(4):935-944 (2019) [Google Scholar]
- D. P. Dee, “A pragmatic approach to model validation”, in Quantitative Skill Assessment for Coastal Ocean Models, vol. 47, Coastal and Estuarine Studies, pp. 1–13, (1995) [Google Scholar]
- R. H. van Waveren, S. Groot, H. Scholten et al., Good Modelling Practice Handbook, STOWA Report 9905, RWS-RIZA, Utrecht, Netherlands, (1999), http://waterland.net/riza/aquest [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.