EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 249 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 249 (2021) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 249, 2021
4th International Conference on Sustainability Science (CSS2020)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Sustainability, Community, Indigenous Knowledge and Gender
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124901008
Published online 07 April 2021
  1. A. C. S. Silva, C. O. Galvão, and G. N. S. Silva, “Droughts and governance impacts on water scarcity: An analysis in the Brazilian semi-arid,” IAHS-AISH Proc. Reports, vol. 369, no. 2004, pp. 129–134, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. F. Van Loon et al., “Drought in a humanmodified world: Reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches,” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 3631–3650, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. L. P. Crevier and L. Parrott, “Synergy between adaptive management and participatory modelling: The two processes as interconnected spirals,” Ecol. Inform., vol. 53, no. May, p. 100982, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Hein, L. Condon, and R. Maxwell, “Evaluating the relative importance of precipitation, temperature and land-cover change in the hydrologic response to extreme meteorological drought conditions over the North American High Plains,” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., pp. 1–30, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. IPCC, “Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,” (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. L. S. Sifundza, P. van der Zaag, and I. Masih, “Evaluation of the responses of institutions and actors to the 2015/2016 el niño drought in the komati catchment in Southern Africa: Lessons to support future drought management,” Water SA, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 547–559, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Zeng, W. Wu, Z. Li, Y. Zhou, and Y. Guo, “Agricultural Drought Risk Assessment in,” no. 22 May 2019, pp. 1–20, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Yoshida, M. Srisutham, S. Sritumboon, D. Suanburi, and N. Janjirauttikul, “Weather-induced economic damage to upland crops and the impact in Thailand.pdf,” no. 30 March 2019, pp. 341–349, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Harsono, D. A. A. Elisabeth, S. Muzaiyanah, and S. A. Rianto, “Soybean-maize intercropping feasibility under drought-prone area in East Java, Indonesia,” Biodiversitas, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3744–3754, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Zhang, H. Qu, X. Yang, M. Wang, N. Qin, and Y. Zou, “Cropping system optimization for drought prevention and disaster reduction with a risk assessment model in Sichuan Province,” Glob. Ecol. Conserv., vol. 23, p. e01095, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Makaya et al., “Water governance challenges in rural South Africa: Exploring institutional coordination in drought management,” Water Policy, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 519–540, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  12. W. S. Júnior et al., “Water: Drought, crisis and governance in australia and brazil,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1–21, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Graversgaard, B. H. Jacobsen, C. Kjeldsen, and T. Dalgaard, “Stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-creation in water planning: Can public participation increase cost-effectiveness?,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–29, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Mellinger and D. Floriani, “Democratic participation in the management of common natural resources and the native populations in the Southern Coast of Paraná,” Ambient. e Soc., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–22, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Baker and F. S. Chapin, “Going beyond ‘it depends:’ the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 23, no. 1, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Graversgaard, M. H. Thorsøe, C. Kjeldsen, and T. Dalgaard, “Evaluating public participation in Denmark’s water councils: How policy design and boundary judgements affect water governance!,” Outlook Agric., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 225–230, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Jiménez et al., “The enabling environment for participation in water and sanitation: A conceptual framework,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–21, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. B. Guaraldo Choguill, “A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries,” Habitat Int., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 431–444, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Kotus and T. Sowada, “Behavioural model of collaborative urban management: extending the concept of Arnstein’s ladder,” Cities, vol. 65, pp. 78–86, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Q. Grafton, D. Garrick, A. Manero, and T. N. Do, “The water governance reform framework: Overview and applications to Australia, Mexico, Tanzania, U.S.A and Vietnam,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 1, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Basco-Carrera, A. Warren, E. van Beek, A. Jonoski, and A. Giardino, “Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 91, pp. 95–110, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Krywkow, “A Methodological Framework for Participatory Processes in Water Resources Management,” University of Twente, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. van Buuren, I. van Meerkerk, and C. Tortajada, “Understanding emergent participation practices in water governance,” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 367–382, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Macura, L. Secco, E. Pisani, A. S. Pullin, and V. Reyes-García, “All that glitters is not gold: the effect of top-down participation on conservation knowledge, attitudes and institutional trust in a Central Indian tiger reserve,” Reg. Environ. Chang, vol. 16, pp. 125–140, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Hassenforder, D. Clavreul, A. Akhmouch, and N. Ferrand, “What’s the middle ground? Institutionalized vs. emerging water-related stakeholder engagement processes,” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 525–542, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Jingling, L. Yun, S. Liya, C. Zhiguo, and Z. Baoqiang, “Public participation in water resources management of Haihe river basin, China: The analysis and evaluation of status quo,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1750–1758, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. U. Stein, G. Özerol, J. Tröltzsch, R. Landgrebe, A. Szendrenyi, and R. Vidaurre, “European Drought and Water Scarcity Policies,” in Governance for Drought Resilience, H. Bressers, B. Nanny, and C. Larrue, Eds. Springer, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  28. UNESCO, “The United Nations World Water Development Report 2020 executive summary: Water and climate change,” Perugia, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Ouyang, K. Zhang, B. Wen, and Y. Lu, “Topdown and bottom-up approaches to environmental governance in China: Evidence from the river chief system (RCS),” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 19, pp. 1–23, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  30. I. Ardiansah, R. B. N. Wargadibrata, C. Asdak, D. M. Rahmah, and S. H. Putri, “Partisipasi Petani Terhadap Pengelolaan Air Irigasi Di Kecamatan Rancaekek, Kabupaten Bandung, Provinsi Jawa Barat,” J. Sains dan Teknol. Ind., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 7, (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.