Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 249, 2021
4th International Conference on Sustainability Science (CSS2020)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 9
Section Sustainability, Community, Indigenous Knowledge and Gender
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124901009
Published online 07 April 2021
  1. UN, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  2. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making And Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Geneva: UNECE, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., no. July, p. 102211, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. F. Persada, S. Lin, R. Nadlifatin, and M. Razif, “A lean based analysis on the Indonesian citizens ’ participation in environmental impact assessment (EIA): a potential improvement through web based system and SMS-gateway,” Open Access J. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–6, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://is.its.ac.id/pubs/oajis/index.php. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. R. Pflughoeft and I. E. Schneider, “Social media as E-participation: Can a multiple hierarchy stratification perspective predict public interest?,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101422. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Roque de Oliveira and M. Partidário, “You see what I mean? – A review of visual tools for inclusive public participation in EIA decision-making processes,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 83, no. May, p. 106413, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106413. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Hanzl, “Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials,” Des. Stud., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 289–307, (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.003. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Glasson, R. Therivel, and A. Chadwick, Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Taylor & Francis, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Bishop Bruce, “Communication in The Planning Process,” in Public Involvement Techniques, J. L. Creighton, J. D. Priscoli, and C. M. Dunning, Eds. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Water Resources, (1998), pp. 85–104. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Brenneis, “An evaluation of public participation in the British Columbia Ministry of Forests,” (1990). [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer, “Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–29, (2000), doi: 10.1177/016224390002500101. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Beierle and J. Cayford, Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  13. EPA(US), Public Participation in Programs under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Clean Water Act. EPA (US), (1979). [Google Scholar]
  14. European Institute for Public Participation (EIPP), “Public Participation in Europe An international perspective,” no. June, pp. 1–49, (2009), [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitapa.gov.it/nc/risorse/pubblicazioni/?eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=1873. [Google Scholar]
  15. N. R. Council, Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Lang, “Public participation in environmental decision-making in China: Toward an Ecosystem approach,” University of Groningen, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Purnama, “Reform of the EIA process in Indonesia: Improving the role of public involvement,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 415–439, (2003), doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00046-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. K. Morgan, Environmental impact assessment: a methodological perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  19. M. W. Boyco, “Public Participation: EIA in Northern Canada and South Africa,” (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. C. O’Faircheallaigh, “Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 19–27, (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001. [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Coenen, “Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions: Introduction,” in Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions, no. 1, Enschede: Springer, (2009), pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Beitsch, “Environmental Review of Major Projects,” (2020). https://thehill.com/policy/energyenvironment/501258-trump-signs-orderremoving-environmental-review-for-majorprojects (accessed Nov. 01, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Swain and S. Hausler, “Australia: The environmental impacts of COVID-19 recovery,” (2020). https://www.mondaq.com/australia/environme nt/951028/the-environmental-impacts-ofcovid-19-recovery (accessed Nov. 01, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  24. UNECE, “Executive Secretary,” (2020). https://www.unece.org/info/media/executive-secretary-blog/2020/environmentaldemocracy-in-times-of-covid-19/doc.html (accessed Nov. 01, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Hartley and C. Wood, “Public participation in environmental impact assessment Implementing the Aarhus Convention,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 319–340, (2005), doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.002. [Google Scholar]
  26. gov.uk., “Consultation and pre-decision matters,” (2020). https://www.gov.uk/guidance/consultation- and-pre-decision-matters#eia (accessed Nov. 01, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. J. L. Moorman and Z. Ge, “Promoting and Strengthening Public Participation in China ’ s Environmental Impact Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : A SSESSMENT P ROCESS : C OMPARING,” vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 281–335, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  28. Statistics Indonesia, “Proportion of Individuals Who Use the Internet by Province (Percent), 2017-2019,” (2020). https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/27/1225/1/pro porsi-individu-yang-menggunakan-internetmenurut-provinsi.html (accessed Nov. 19, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Roser, H. Ritchie, and E. Ortiz-Ospina, “Internet,” (2019). https://ourworldindata.org/internet (accessed Nov. 01, 2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.