Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
2021 International Conference on Tourism, Economy and Environmental Sustainability (TEES 2021)
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 5
Section Analysis of Energy Industry Economy and Consumption Structure Model
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125101020
Published online 15 April 2021
  1. Parker S. K., Wang Y., Liao J. When Is Proactivity Wise? A Review of Factors That Influence the Individual Outcomes of Proactive Behavior [J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2019, 6 (1): 221–248. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu W., Tangirala S., Lee C., et al. New directions for exploring the consequences of proactive behaviors: Introduction to the special issue [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2019, 40 (1): 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffin M. A., Neal A., Parker S. K. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fuller J. B., Marler L. E., Hester K. Bridge building within the province of proactivity [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33 (8): 1053–1070. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anita Starzyk S. S. When do low-initiative employees feel responsible for change and speak up to managers? [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2019, 115: 103342. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu C., Parker S. K., Wu L., et al. When and Why People Engage in Different Forms of Proactive Behavior: Interactive Effects of Self-construals and Work Characteristics [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61 (1): 293–323. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li N., Chiaburu D. S., Kirkman B. L. Cross- Level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior [J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43 (4): 1076–1102. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ouyang K., Lam W., Wang W. Roles of gender and identification on abusive supervision and proactive behavior [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2015, 32 (3): 671–691. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin C., Kao Y., Chen Y., et al. Fostering changeoriented behaviors: A broaden-and-build model [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2016, 31 (3): 399–414. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tian X., Zhai X. Employee involvement in decision-making: the more the better? [J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2019, 40 (4): 768–782. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Y., Wang M., Van Jaarsveld D. D., et al. From Employee-experienced High-involvement Work System to Innovation: An Emergence-based Human Resource Management Framework [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61 (5): 2000–2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang Y. High-involvement human resource practices, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors [J]. The Service Industries Journal, 2012, 32 (8): 1209–1227. [Google Scholar]
  13. Paré G., Tremblay M., Montréal H. The Influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on Information technology professionals ’ turnover intentions [J]. Group & Organization Management, 2007, 32 (3): 326–357. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawler E. E. III The ultimate advantage:Creating the high-involvement organization [M]. Jossey-Bass, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  15. Parker S. K., Bindl U. K., Strauss K. Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation [J]. Journal of Management, 2010, 36 (4): 827–856. [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith M. B., Wallace J. C., Vandenberg R. J., et al. Employee involvement climate, task and citizenship performance, and instability as a moderator [J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2018, 29 (4): 615–636. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bodla A. A., Ningyu T. Transformative HR practices and employee task performance in hightech firms [J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2017, 30 (5): 710–724. [Google Scholar]
  18. Noor A. N. M., Khalid S. A., Nor M. N. M., et al. Relationship Between High-Involvement Human Resource Practices and Innovative Work Behavior [J]. Advanced Science Letters, 2017, 23 (8): 7505–7507. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gretchen Spreitzer K. S. J. D. A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work [J]. Organization Science, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being [J]. Am Psychol, 2000, 55 (1): 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cornelia Niessen I. M. C. S. Thriving when exhausted: The role of perceived transformational leadership [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains [J]. Canadian Psychology, 2008, 49 (1): 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carmeli A., Spreitzer G. M. Trust, Connectivity, and Thriving: Implications for Innovative Behaviors at Work [J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2009, 43 (3): 169–191. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fredrickson B. L. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden and build theory of positive emotions [J]. American Psychologist, 2001, 56 (3): 218–226. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fredrickson B. L. Positive Emotions Broaden and Build[M]// Elsevier Science & Technology, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  26. Porath C., Spreitzer G., Gibson C., et al. Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33 (2): 250–275. [Google Scholar]
  27. Baron R.M., Da K. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1986, 51 (6): 1173–1182. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.