Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
2021 International Conference on Tourism, Economy and Environmental Sustainability (TEES 2021)
Article Number 01060
Number of page(s) 9
Section Analysis of Energy Industry Economy and Consumption Structure Model
Published online 15 April 2021
  1. X. Shang, L. Wang. Agricultural industrialized consortia: Re-organizational dual dimension, transaction cost saving and market power reshaping. Chinese farmers’ cooperatives, 1 17–19 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Zhou. Research on the innovative development of agricultural industrialized consortia under the strategy of rural revitalization--operational characteristics, development dilemmas and path analysis. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 47 32–35 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Wu, W. Cai. Research on the impact of knowledge spillover on the upgrading of advanced manufacturing clusters - based on the mediating role of enterprise cooperation and government support. East China Economic Management, 33 58–65 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Chen, K. Xu. Factors influencing the risk of “middle-income trap” in industrial transfer out of the country - based on the stakeholder perspective. East China Economic Management, 31 93–99 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. Q. Guo Qiang, S. Yin, Y. Liu, F. Yan, H. Jiang. A study on the influence of initial resources and social capital on the growth of tourism small enterprises--a case study of Hongcun. Journal of Tourism, 34 6–47 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Yang, F. Wang, Y. Zhou. Research on the choice of R&D cooperation mode of high-tech enterprises--an empirical analysis based on 38 high-tech enterprises in Beijing. China Soft Science, 6 172–177 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Sun, Y. Liu, S. Zheng. Research on the relationship between alliance social capital, knowledge management and innovation performance--a conceptual framework based on technology innovation alliance. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), 32 43–49 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. F. Helliwell, R. D. Putnam. Economic Growth and Social Capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Miao. A study on the cooperative participation behavior of farmers in small-scale water facilities from the perspective of multidimensional heterogeneity of social capital. China Population-Resources and Environment, 24 46–54 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Uphoff, C. M. Wijayaratna. Demonstrated benefits from social capital: the productivity of farmer organizations in Gal Oya, Sri World Development, 28 1875–1890 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. S. Adler, H. Van Buren. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27 17–40 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  12. D. J. McAllister. Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Wang. A study on the influence path of urban residents’ waste sorting behavior-differential willingness and action. China Environmental Science, 40 495–3505 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Lv, L. Wu, X. Zhang. A theoretical framework for the adaptation environment of formal and informal network interactions of enterprises from the perspective of CAS. Science and Technology Management, 37 31–42 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. W. M. Cohen, D. Levinthal. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. A. Zahra, G. George. Absorptive capacity: A review reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27 185–203 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Dai, G. Zhu. A study of social capital and innovation performance with absorptive capacity as a moderating variable--an empirical analysis based on Guangdong firms. Soft Science, 25 80–84+90 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Wu. Study on the impact of inter-supply chain relationship quality on knowledge absorptive capacity and cooperative innovation performance of enterprises. Statistics and Information Forum, 27 99–105 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Yu, Y. Dai. Research on the influencing factors of regional science and technology innovation competition based on fuzzy QFD and fuzzy TOPSIS--the Yangtze River Delta region as an example. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 30 41–46 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. General Office of the State Council, PRC. Opinions on accelerating the construction of policy system to foster new agricultural business subjects. China cooperative economy, 11 5–7 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Wei. Research on the measurement of enterprise social capital. Science Research, 3 518–522 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Chang, Y. Yang. Innovation network practices, network location and knowledge sharing. Research and Development Management, 28 89–96 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. X. Dang, Y. Sun, J. Song. The impact of dual innovation on network practices under different trust scenarios. Management Science, 26 25–34 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Uzzi. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Wei. Corporate social capital and technological innovation: an empirical study based on absorptive capacity. China Industrial Economics, 9 119–127 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  26. J. J. P. Jansen, F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, H. W. Volberda. Managing Potential and Realized absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter?. The Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  27. W. Xue, J. Lei, and N. Yi. An empirical study on the relationship between relational capital, organizational learning and R&D alliance performance. China Industrial Economics, 4 89–99 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Deng Jiaojiao. Research on the integration of contractual and relational governance of public projects and its governance mechanism. Tianjin University, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. X. Dang, L. Li, W. Zhang. Research on the influence of inter-firm dependence and cooperation motives on firms’ cooperation behavior in technology innovation networks. Forecasting, 29 37–41+47 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Fielding, N. and J. Fielding, 1986, Linking Data:the Ar ticulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Re search, Beverly Hills, London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Pezeshkan, A. Smith, S. Fainshmidt, et al. A neo-configurational institutional analysis of international venture capital attractiveness and performance: insights for Asia-Pacific. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Yi, K. Zhang. Structure, mechanism and function:A three-dimensional analysis of network-based collaborative environmental governance in China--the case of Zero Alliance. Administrative Forum, 26 129–137. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Gächter, C. Thöni. SOCIAL LEARNING AND VOLUNTARY COOPERATION AMONG LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Li, H. Hu. The impact of incubation network governance mechanisms on network performance:The moderating role of environmental dynamics. Management Review, 28 100–112 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Schulze, Martin Hoegl. Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: a behavioral approach. Research Policy, 37 (10) (2008). [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Wang, Y. Du. Research on business incubation network evolution, risk and governance mechanism. Technology Economics and Management Research, 10 52–56 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Zhang, F. Li. The connotation expansion and reconceptualization of enterprise absorptive capacity. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 31 80–85 (2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.