Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 255, 2021
International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2021)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 03 May 2021
  1. Bae, H. S. (2017). The effect of environmental capabilities on environmental strategy and environmental performance of Korean exporters for the green supply chain management. The Asian journal of shipping and logistics, 33(3), 167–176. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rehman, S. U., Kraus, S., Shah, S. A., Khanin, D., & Mahto, R. V. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120481. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, S., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2019). Effects of proactive environmental strategy on environmental performance: Mediation and moderation analyses. Journal of cleaner production, 235, 1438–1449. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Y. J., Wu, Y. J., & Wu, T. (2015). Moderating effect of environmental supply chain collaboration: evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 45(9–10), 959–978. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zailani, S. H. M., Eltayeb, T. K., Hsu, C. C., & Tan, K. C. (2012). The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance. International journal of operations & production management [Google Scholar]
  6. Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146–165. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y. S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of business ethics, 77(3), 271–286. [Google Scholar]
  8. Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 297–306. [Google Scholar]
  9. Derchi, G.B., Burkert, M., Oyon, D., 2015. Environmental management accounting systems: a review of the evidence and propositions for future research. In: Epstein, M., Farrell, A.M. (Eds.), Accounting and Control for Sustainability. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK, pp. 197e229. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hart, S.L., Dowell, G., 2011. A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J. Manag. 37 (5), 1464e1479. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120262. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan, F., Lian, H., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2021). Can environmental regulation promote urban green innovation Efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125060. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2018). How resource alignment moderates the relationship between environmental innovation strategy and green innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cao, H., & Chen, Z. (2019). The driving effect of internal and external environment on green innovation strategy-The moderating role of top management’s environmental awareness. Nankai Business Review International. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rehman, S. U., Kraus, S., Shah, S. A., Khanin, D., & Mahto, R. V. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120481. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tu, Y., & Wu, W. (2021). How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 504–516. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Boulianne, E. (2013). Stakeholders’ influence on environmental strategy and performance indicators: A managerial perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 301–316. [Google Scholar]
  18. Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Rajiani, I., Rustiarini, N. W., Supartha, W. G., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2020). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation culture into SMEs’ sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (in press).–2020–0192 [Google Scholar]
  19. Singleton, R., & Strait, B. (2010). Straits. Approaches to Social Research. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cohen, P. N. (1998). Black concentration effects on black-white and gender inequality: Multilevel analysis for US metropolitan areas. Social Forces, 77(1), 207–229. [Google Scholar]
  23. Arsawan, I., Wirga, I. W., Rajiani, I., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2020). Harnessing knowledge sharing practice to enhance innovative work behavior: the paradox of social exchange theory. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O., & Tamošiūnienė, R. (2021). Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Central European Business Review, 10(1), 99–113. [Google Scholar]
  25. Koval, V., Mikhno, I., Trokhymets, O., Kustrich, L., Vdovenko, N. (2020). Modeling the interaction between environment and the economy considering the impact on ecosystem. E3S Web Conferences, 166, 13002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., & Tan, K. C. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.