Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2021
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2021)
Article Number 07076
Number of page(s) 12
Section Psychology of Environmentally Responsible Behavior
Published online 20 May 2021
  1. A. G. Zvezdina, A. Grishina, E. Zvezdina, E. Dyakova, University students’ attitude to distance learning in situation of uncertainty, E3S Web of Conferences, 210, 18017 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Alqabbani, A. Almuwais, N. Benajiba, F. Almoayad, Readiness towards emergency shifting to remote learning during COVID-19 pandemic among university instructors, E-Learning and Digital Media 2042753020981651 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. J.F. Clabaugh, L.J. Duque, Fields, Academic Stress and Emotional Well-Being in United States College Students Following Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 628787 (2021) doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628787 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Denisova, P. Ermakov, I. Skirtach, V. Korkhova, Subjective discomfort and personality traits of university teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic, E3S Web of Conferences, 210, 19021 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.V. Grishina, I.V. Abakumova, Informational Behavior in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Psychological Predictors, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8, 59–67 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Penado Abilleira, M-L. Rodicio-García, M.P. Ríos-de Deus, M.J. Mosquera-González, Technostress in Spanish University Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 617650 (2021) doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617650 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Tzivinikou, G. Charitaki, D. Kagkara, Distance Education Attitudes (DEAS) During Covid-19 Crisis: Factor Structure, Reliability and Construct Validity of the Brief DEA Scale in Greek-Speaking SEND. Teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–19 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. Expert committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation: Survey (2020) (last accessed: 2021/03/18) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Borokhovski, D. Pickup, R. Tamim, “Emergency education” model: How normal could the projected new normal be? E3S Web of Conferences – in the current issue (2021) [Google Scholar]
  10. L.A. Dikaya, G.A. Avanesyan, I.S. Dikiy, V.A. Kirik, V.A. Egorova, How Personality Traits are Related to the Attitudes Toward Forced Remote Learning During COVID-19: Predictive Analysis Using Generalized Additive Modelling. Frontiers in Education (2021) doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.629213 [Google Scholar]
  11. A.V. Grigoryev, The risks of digitalization of school education (based on an Astrakhan teachers survey). Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Henderson, N. Selwyn, R. Aston, What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 8(42), 1567–1579 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, A. Bond, The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review, 27, 1–15 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. I.S. Kochetkova, L.A. Terskaia, Experience in using the e-learning system (Moodle) in general scientific and special disciplines. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 4(21), 93–97 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  15. N.A. Mullagaliev, N.V. Urazlina, On the attitude of students to the introduction of distance learning e lements in a university. Innovative science, 1(1), 188–191 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. M.G. Sorokova, The digital educational environment of the university: Who is more comfortable studying in it?. Psychological Science and Education, 2(25), 44–58 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. E.A. Bryzgalin, A.E. Vojskunskij, S.A. Kozlovskij, Psychological analysis of practical experience in developing the online encyclopedia “Wikipedia”. Siberian psychological journal, 73, 17–39 (2019). DOI: 10.17223/17267080/73/2. [Google Scholar]
  18. A.E Vojskunskij, Cyberpsychologist perspectives for the study of group forms of creative activity. Creativity in the modern world: human, society, technology, 22–23. Institute of psychology of RAS, Moscow (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.E. Vojskunskij, T.D. Yermolova, S.R. Yagolkovskij, V.M. Khromova, Creativity in online gaming: individual and dyadic performance in Minecraft. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 4(10), 144–161 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Biwer, W. Wiradhany, M.G.A. oude Egbrink, H. Hospers, S. Wasenitz, W. Jansen, A.B.H. De Bruin, Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology (2021) doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642593 [Google Scholar]
  21. Z. Ismail, N. Halias, R. Md Saad, M.F. Mohamed, Motivation as the Mediator in Relationship between Non-verbal Communication of Arabic Language Teachers and Student Learning Outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 700–708 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  22. I.A. Poluekhtova, O. Yu. Vikhrova, E. L. Vartanova, Effectiveness of Online Education for the Professional Training of Journalists: Students’ Distance Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 4(13), 26–37 (2020) DOI: 10.11621/pir.2020.0402 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Rashid, S. S. Yadav, Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on higher education and research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 2(14), 340–343 (2020) DOI: 10.1177/0973703020946700 [Google Scholar]
  24. R.M. Bernard, P.C. Abrami, E. Borokhovski, R. Tamim A. Wade, M. Surkes, E. Bethel, A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 3(79), 1243–1289 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Borokhovski, R. M. Bernard, R. M. Tamim, R. F. Schmid, A. Sokolovskaya, Technology-supported student interaction in post-secondary education: A meta-analysis of designed versus contextual treatments. Computers & Education, 96, 15–28 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  26. V. P. Zinchenko, B. G. Meshcheryakov, Psychological dictionary (Astrel, AST, Transitkniga, Moscow, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  27. V. V. Zhovtonozhko, A historical analysis of the term of socio-psychological climate in Russian science. Vlast’ 3, 163–167 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. S. V. Alexandrovа, The analysis of the psychological microclimate of the student group. Science and education: experience, problems, development prospects, 170–173 (Krasnoyarsk State agricultural university, Krasnoyarsk 2019). [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Konold, D. Cornell, K. Shukla, F. Huang, Racial/ethnic differences in perceptions of school climate and its association with student engagement and peer aggression. Journal of youth and adolescence, 6(46), 1289–1303 (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0576-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. G. G. Bear, C. Yang, D. Chen, X. He, J. S. Xie, X. Huang, Differences in school climate and student engagement in China and the United States. School Psychology Quarterly 2(33), 323–335 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  31. A. I. Dontsov, D. A. Dontsov, Methodological and diagnostic foundations of practical research of children, adolescents and youth groups and teams. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 1, 77–88 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  32. A. O. Prokhorov, Methods for diagnosing and measuring mental states of the individual. (PER SE, Moscow, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  33. V.M. Zavyalova, Assessment of the microclimate of a student group. Socio-psychological diagnostics of the development of personality and small groups, 141–142 (Publishing house of the Institute of Psychotherapy, Moscow, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  34. L. N. Sobchik, Methods of psychological diagnostics. Issue 3. Diagnostics of interpersonal relations. Modified version of T. Leary’s interpersonal diagnostics. (Method Guide. Moscow, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. V. Batarshev, I. Yu.,Alekseeva, E. V. Mayorova, Diagnostics of professionally important qualities. (Peter, Moscow, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  36. E. V. Ermolaeva, L. A. Pavlova, Favorable social and psychological climate in the team as a condition for effective work. New science: theoretical and practical view, 3, 50–52 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  37. A. V. Sidorenkov, N. Yu. Ulyanova, O. Yu. Shipitko, Modern foreign researches in psychology of conflicts in small groups. Psychological Journal, 6(38), 30–41 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.