EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 266 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 266 (2021) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2021
Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources 2021
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 15
Section New Sustainable Approaches to the Challenges of the Oil and Gas Sector
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126601008
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. D.S. Bratskikh, K.D. Parfenchik, E.I. Krapivsky, Transportation of Arctic Gas GHGs to Central Europe, St. Petersburg Mining University (SPB), 1–4 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. V.S. Litvinenko, P.S. Tsvetkov, M.V. Dvoinikov, G.V. Buslaev, Obstacles to hydrogen initiatives in the context of sustainable global energy development, Journal of Mining Institute, 244, 428–438 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A.S. Khodyreva, E.B. Gridina, Industrial and labor safety during the extraction and transportation of natural gas on the Arctic shelf, St. Petersburg University of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, 1–10 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. Joo Yong Lee. Review on the Gas Hydrate Development and Production as a New Energy Resource, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (2011). [Google Scholar]
  5. A.K. Fernandez, Formation of gas hydrates in Artic, SPMU, 1–8 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.V. Ilinykh, M.N. Nazarova, E.V. Akimova, A.G. Palaev, Assessment of the technical condition of underwater crossings of trunk pipelines in real terms, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 194 (7) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Bychkova, A. Khrulenko, F. Domanyuk et al., Challenges and solutions for the development of arctic petroleum resources, Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas, University of Stavanger, 22–27 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  8. Set of Regulations 369.1325800.2017. Stationary offshore platforms. DesignRegulations, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. Set of Regulations. Offshore pipelines. Design and Construction Regulations. (Moscow, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  10. E.G. Katysheva, The role of the Northern Sea Route in Russian LNG Project Development, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 180(1), 012008 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. I.V. Stepanov et al. Environmental and economic assessment of offshore transportation of compressed gas. (M., 2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. V.I. Bogoyavlensky, T.A. Budagova, A.V. Bezhentsev, Termobaric conditions of the Barents-Kara Region, IPG RAS (Moscow), Geotrace (Tyumen): 1–12. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. T.O. Gazprom 2-3.5-051-2006 Standards for technological design of trunk gas pipelines, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  14. V.I. Bogoyavlensky, Oil and gas production in the World Ocean and the potential of the Russian shelf. FEC development strategy, 6, 44–52 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. V.I. Nochvai, Efficiency of Russian LNG and CNG transportation to Asia via the Northern Sea Route, SPMU, 1–23 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. SNiP 412-81, Recommendations for the design and construction of underwater oil and gas pipelines, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  17. A.M. Kirilov, Offshore pipelaying in the Arctic. Digitalization and new ways of its development, SPMU, 1–6 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  18. A.G. Aksyutin, V.A. Ishkov, Grachev, environmental and economic assessment of marine transportation of compressed gas, Gas Industry, 4(767) , 114–122 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. E.A. Gushchina, Comparison of transportation costs for LNG and CNG from the Barents Sea fields to Central Europe, SPMU, 1–18. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. D.S. Bratskikh, K.D. Parfenchik, A.V. Menshenina, D.A. Kalashnikova, F.V. Meryashev, V.A. Negrova, The construction of offshore gas pipeline systems in the Arctic zone: 54 p. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. A.F. Chanysheva, A.A. Ilinova, V.M. Solovyova, A.E. Cherepovitsyn, Long-term forecasts of oil and gas shelf development in the Arctic: the existing methodical approaches and assessment of the possibility of their application, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 302(1), 012068, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. A.T. Bakesheva, V.G. Fetisov, V.V. Pshenin, Refined algorithm for localization of leaks in gas pipelines with the determination of quantitative parameters International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 12(12), 2867–2869 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. N.I. Braghnikov, Innovative technologies for the development of offshore gas hydrate deposits, SPSBU, 1–13 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Bulakh, A.B. Zolotukhin, O.T. Gudmestad Fedyn, Arch as a promising zone for HC reserves in the Barents Sea. An agreement between Russia and Norway, SPE paper (2011) [Google Scholar]
  25. Y.N. Grigorenko, E.A. Margulis, Y.N. Novikov, V.S. Sobolev, Russia’s offshore hydrocarbon base and prospects for its development, Oil and Gas Geology. Theory and Practice. 5–7 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Minikeyeva, Parametric Study of Multiphase Flow in the Fedyn Arch Pipelines of the Barents Sea (University of Stavanger-Norway, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Wettengel, Gas pipeline Nord Stream 2 links Germany to Russia, but splits Europe, Clean Energy Wire, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Babyr, A. Karpikov, R. Aliev. An analysis of the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing at YS1 of the Northern field IOP Conference Series: M.S.E 952 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  29. V. Fetisov et al. Evaluation of Pollutant Emissions into the Atmosphere during the Loading of Hydrocarbons in Marine Oil Tankers in the Arctic Region J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 917 (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.